Originally Posted by TerryRL
I think the Pirates movies benefited from the massive popularity of Jack Sparrow. I agree that the all the movies are mediocre (the first being the best). The Fast & the Furious series has always been a head-scratcher for me in terms of its popularity. The shocker with that franchise is that the last two films have been the biggest hits (films 4 and 5). "Fast Five" is already the biggest hit of the series and has tallied more than $500 million worldwide thus far, "Fast & Furious" (film 4), which had been the biggest hit, topped out at just over $363 million globally.
Of the 27 franchises I listed, I can name only 7 that yielded more than one truly great movie (IMO), while the rest ranged from decent, mediocre, or god-awful.
Batman, Harry Potter, Indiana Jones, James Bond, The Lord of the Rings, Star Trek, and Star Wars. Again, just my opinion.
Originally Posted by Brandon Conway
I'm pretty shocked at the low turnout for Kung Fu Panda 2. Maybe it'll make a notable jump for Sat-Mon once kids are out of school, but making the same over 5 days as the first one did can't be seen as what DreamWorks wanted, especially when the first one was well liked and this one got really good reviews overall. And it's not like the audience is the same necessarily for The Hangover Part II.
Originally Posted by Jose Martinez
So if figures are correct, Kung Fu Panda 2 made 55% of its box office from the 2D presentations. When are producers going to wake up and smell the coffee?
Originally Posted by TerryRL
Of the 3,925 theaters KF2 opened in 2,707 of them are showing it in 3D.
When it stops making them money. Since they made an extra $3 or $4 for 45% of every ticket that was sold, it isn't that time yet. Clearly, you hate 3-D but do you really think companies would turn down 'free' money?Jose Martinez said:So if figures are correct, Kung Fu Panda 2 made 55% of its box office from the 2D presentations. When are producers going to wake up and smell the coffee?
I don't hate 3D. I loved Avatar because James Cameron knew what 3D could give the audience. The 3D movies coming out now were decided by money hungry producers who want to make that "extra" buck knowing that audiences might be suckered into paying the extra service charge for 3D that really isn't there. There is a difference when a filmmaker decides to make it in 3D to give the audience something to enjoy and from those who just do it for money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR
When it stops making them money. Since they made an extra $3 or $4 for 45% of every ticket that was sold, it isn't that time yet. Clearly, you hate 3-D but do you really think companies would turn down 'free' money?
Originally Posted by TravisR
So if figures are correct, Kung Fu Panda 2 made 55% of its box office from the 2D presentations. When are producers going to wake up and smell the coffee?