2001 Special Edition coming?

Discussion in 'DVD' started by Aaron Cohen, Jun 11, 2003.

  1. Aaron Cohen

    Aaron Cohen Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2002
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    With the current deal running at Best Buy (2 dvd's for 20 dollars, many of them Kubrick titles) I was thinking of picking up "The Shining" and "2001".

    I was wondering though, will there be a Two-Disc Special Edition version of "2001"? I recall there was a bit of noise about the theatrical re-release of the film in 2001. How is the transfer on the current disc?

    I suppose it really doesn't matter if a special edition is coming out or not with the 10 dollar price tag...

    Thanks for any help!
     
  2. Patrick McCart

    Patrick McCart Lead Actor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    7,591
    Likes Received:
    241
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Georgia (the state)
    Real Name:
    Patrick McCart
    The transfer on the 16x9 remaster is excellent, along with the 5.1 mix. Only a short trailer is included as an extra, but the overall quality of the a/v presentation makes up for it.
     
  3. Bryan Tuck

    Bryan Tuck Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2002
    Messages:
    1,729
    Likes Received:
    251
    Trophy Points:
    1,610
    Real Name:
    Bryan Tuck
    I believe the transfer on the "Digitally Restored and Remastered" version of 2001 (the one with the space station on the cover, not the photo of Dave) was made from the restored 70mm version used for the theatrical semi-rerelease in 2001-2002.

    It looks great. I've heard rumors about a new edition of the whole Kubrick collection, but they're just Internet rumors; make sure to include the grain of salt.

    For $10, I'd say go for it. The remastered version of The Shining is great, too. In fact, I think it looks better than Eyes Wide Shut.
     
  4. Jack Briggs

    Jack Briggs Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 1999
    Messages:
    16,738
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The film was not "restored"; the original elements have been meticulously maintained all these years. Only the audio was remastered. And the newer DVD transfer more accurately reproduces the film's glorious photography, and it's 16:9-encoded as opposed to the earlier MGM disc's 4:3 letterbox transfer.

    No plans have been announced for any sort of Special Edition, and given how lukewarm Warner's "promotion" of the 70mm theatrical reissue was I wouldn't expect one. But no film more richly deserves an all-out SE treatment than this one.
     
  5. Ian Such

    Ian Such Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 1998
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  6. Dave Molinarolo

    Dave Molinarolo Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    While we're on it, how's the 2010 disc in A/V quality?
     
  7. Jack Briggs

    Jack Briggs Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 1999
    Messages:
    16,738
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But why, Dave?
     
  8. ShaunS

    ShaunS Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2002
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I've seen the Kubrick Collection version of 2001, and this other one in a silver box. I think it includes a couple things (soundtrack perhaps?). Are the two the same in terms of quality?

    ShaunS
     
  9. Dave Molinarolo

    Dave Molinarolo Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  10. Kevin M

    Kevin M Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2000
    Messages:
    5,172
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well to answer your question.......
     
  11. Patrick McCart

    Patrick McCart Lead Actor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    7,591
    Likes Received:
    241
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Georgia (the state)
    Real Name:
    Patrick McCart
    The DVD uses the same transfer that is shown on TCM.

    It's OK, but it's your standard cheapie Metrocolor processing of the 1980s.

    The quality of the DVD is the least of the problems.
     
  12. Ricardo C

    Ricardo C Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    5,059
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The 2010 DVD looks ok, but it's a non-anamorphic transfer [​IMG] Too bad, because, say what you will about the film, if there's one thing it doesn't lack, it's eye candy. Personally, I enjoy the movie, but if you're expecting a film that feels like a companion piece to 2001, this isn't it. It's pretty good in its own right, but it hardly feels like a continuation of the original.
     
  13. Dave Mack

    Dave Mack Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,668
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually, the remastered 2001 has LOADS of EE. Check out the scenes in the beginning, THE DAWN OF MAN, and The scene on the space station.
    Could have looked MUCH better.


    D
     
  14. Patrick McCart

    Patrick McCart Lead Actor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    7,591
    Likes Received:
    241
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Location:
    Georgia (the state)
    Real Name:
    Patrick McCart
     
  15. Dave H

    Dave H Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2000
    Messages:
    5,579
    Likes Received:
    208
    Trophy Points:
    9,110
    Yes, the only problem with 2001 is the EE. Everything else looks great.
     
  16. Jack Briggs

    Jack Briggs Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 1999
    Messages:
    16,738
    Likes Received:
    129
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But, then, EE plagues most discs coming our way, some more so than others.
     
  17. Dave Mack

    Dave Mack Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,668
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    VERY true, Jack. Which is why it's SO refreshing to get the rare disc that doesn't have any. Titanic, for example, which if would have been 16x9 annie enhanced would have been the ref. standard for quite some time.
    As it is, I wish they would stop doing it. But still, 2001 does have ALOT of EE. Very distracting on my settup, especially after getting spoiled by something like "Training Day".

    [​IMG] D
     
  18. Joshua_Y

    Joshua_Y Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,241
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I prefer for there to not be a SE of 2001...its a film that needs to be mysterious and I dont an SE is necessary at all!
     
  19. Aaron Cohen

    Aaron Cohen Second Unit

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2002
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joshua, I was only bringing up the possibility of a SE in case the video quality needed serious revamping as I had never heard about the transfre quality. I wasn't suggesting anything in the way of extras, though to be honest I probably wouldn't mind. If they did any new edition, I would assume it would be under Warner's 2-Disc Special Edition line where Casablanca, The Color Purple, The Right Stuff, etc. are.
     
  20. Kevin M

    Kevin M Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2000
    Messages:
    5,172
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
     

Share This Page