Search results

This is exactly what I'm talking about - the science and algorithms are there, but nobody cares to standardize this process across the digital distribution stack from post-production to streaming distribution then to TVs. It was done for HDR10 and appears to be doable for motion.

it feels like judder/stutter could be solved in software if it was important enough - if you can tone map 2000 nits of brightness into a TV capable of only 700 nits, and things still look natural with an overall HDR effect, I'm sure the $$ millions spent on this could also solve motion artifacts

So are the digital intermediate transfers today all done in 24 or 30p? Given that TVs capable of 120Hz are falling below $1,000, they no longer have to take into account TV limitations and can focus on source image quality.

Don't get me started. That's why there's the 2K intermediate to make sure everybody is on the same resolution, etc.

If Roku is converting 24p to 60, then it's already incorporated the judder into its 60hz signal because 24 is not evenly divisible into 60 - so if you receive this signal from the Roku3 it will be garbage in garbage out. It's best to receive everything as a native 24 and let your TV's latest...

Agreed - my point is that TV processing is not designed to fix this, so i'm in agreement with you - processing is at best hit or miss

The problem is that stutter is still noticeable due to the sample-and-hold plus super fast processing of OLED unrelated to the incoming signal. There will always be a slow pan that pushes the OLED beyond its ability to cope.