HDR? HDR? We don‘t need no stinking HDR. With all of the element problems, we were thrilled to replicate the look and textures in SDR.
Extremely problematic elements, with 21 minutes derived from b/w.
The 8k version is totally based upon our original scans, as well as color, which is captured and saved.
An interesting halo project, but as noted above, most relevant toward medical and other technical use.
Mr. Previn was extremely helpful and generous with his time toward the MFL restoration, as to how the original recordings were produced.
An extraordinary gentleman, and a great talent.
MFL is glorious in 4k. HDR could potentially cause harm, and not good.
Not all films are ripe to be HDR’d.
Fortunately, we do have the means to HDR an image, akin to waving vermouth over vodka.
The LoC "preserves." They do not restore. Generally, when a film is added to the list, the copyright owner, will donate a quality pre-print element to the Library.
Yes. CBS properly supported their asset, with a new recorded 65mm negative, datasat track, and fully timed answer print.
I don't believe in 70mm projection, except in special circumstances, on proper equipment, and most importantly, with trained projectionists -- reel to reel.
Far too many...
There are two forms of 96k audio.
One is Dolby upsampled from specially created 96 to 48 files, which should read on hardware as 96.
The other is pure 96, which is what you'll find on MFL, replicating in a slightly compressed fashion the original magnetic elements, as harvested and cleaned...
I presume you mean HDR.
The problem with HDR and older films is overall color / density stability, without adding another set of problems. MFL is not what it appears to be. Color took five months. Problems with differential fade, mold on sep masters, and extremely unstable color, both from...
If I'm reading you properly, what you may be hearing in sound 1, is air being pushed from a cushion. I've never noted any anomalies as to S2.
The most interesting transparency of audio that I noted, hearing the new transfer from the original six track, is what appears to possibly be a...
You missed the discussion of my having apparently tested the incorrect film elements. It appears that my comments were based upon a duplicate negative that had been overprinted in the mid-1960s by Ken Films. I had forgotten to consult my film stock gauge.
The original has been examined by a...