Search results

I viewed it projected 8.5 feet wide, sitting 16 feet back, and grain, while not invisible, seldom if ever called attention to itself or took me out of the film. In that sense, it wasn't an issue at all.

That provided screenshot was so grossly, absurdly bad that it's astonishing to me that it could seriously be taken as an accurate representation of a release by a reputable company - something that could have been easily determined by a brief perusal of posts in this very thread.