Search results

Maybe for you it is. For others maybe not. Although I highly doubt you are spending 10 grand on a JVC just for its film qualities, considering how much you are into high end gaming.

The only thing I could find was the write up here by Martin Dew. I re-read it. It looks like it would be a good projector if one.primarily watches movies. It would a non-starter for anyone who wants to game at 4K with refresh rates above 60Hz. It doesn't look like it supports gaming at 1080p...

I'm wondering how the Optoma UHZ50 would stack up compared to the Epson and JVC models. 4K Laser DLP around a SMRP of 3000US. I believe it has optional 3D jut I don't know how it would stack up in the gaming department I'd one was a gamer. The JVC would be ideal, but the price of even the...

14000 Canadian + 1680 sales.taxes. 15680 not including the extra cost for the transmitter and a.pair of glasses if the 3D option was wanted. I wish I had 16 grand to spend on something that will be obsolete in a year. It does look impressive though. These JVC units always do. My RS2U looked...

I just don't notice the difference as much as I do with DV treated material. Of course, I also haven't spent a lot of time fiddling with calibrations. I'm reaching the point in my life where I just want to watch the TV, not spend innumerable hours fiddling with settings.

25K American for the top model is approximately 31,800 in Canadian pesos. I could just about purchase an EV for that kind of money. :lol:

Well getting back on topic for these projectors, 3D support is an option, not an included feature. It is another 200+ on top of the projector base price if a person wants 3D.

Sorry. If I created the impression that HDR wasn't needed that wasn't my intent. I just don't notice the effect of an HDR layer on a film or TV show as much as I do with DV. If someone notices a big difference then that is great and if they choose to buy a set based on wanting the HDR feature...

I barely notice a difference between an HDR or non-HDR release on my OLED. DV? That I notice. However, if you notice a difference then that is great. My main point is that HDR is one of the excuses that have been used to justify dropping 3D on TV sets and it is garbage. I'm pretty sure that...

IMO, brightness and contrast is more key to immersive 3D than picture size. The screen in the theatre that I watch 3D films in is massively larger than my original.65" OLED was, but the 3D on my OLED was vastly better to watch, regardless of the picture size, because the image was, bright...

Not sure why people think 4K with HDR is somehow better than 3D. Most films released on disc aren't even 4K. They are upconverts of 2K masters. That being said, the only reason I would want 3D capability on a projector is to be able to watch the 3D films I already purchased. It isn't for new...

Sorry. When you.said 4 Atmos channels, I figured those are the height channels, so four ceiling speakers. Honest mistake.

Really? How else would you interpret a statement where you basically say that people will drop 25K on a projector but use only a receiver rather than separates? And I wasn't baiting. I asked a question that is all .

I'm happy that works for you. I don't have overhead speakers since all of.my gear is in an upstairs living room, where adding overheads is not practical. I'm also running only one sub, but since my space is only 12 X 16 feet the 8 speakers I have already barely fits the space. Separates would...

Is this some sort of PC master race.thing? How is.running separates superior to a receiver in the typical home space? Over time I have spent about 10 grand total on my present speaker set up and it is all run using a Yamahs A3060. It does a more than adequate job in the space I have.

For deep pockets.only.