Search results

That is how I read it, Gary. Philip was helping to support your post.

You certainly captured the look color-wise of several Fox titles I have (WILL SUCCESS SPOIL ROCK HUNTER, THE KING AND I, THE BLACK SWAN, WILD RIVER, etc.), or at least night scenes therein.

No expletives, chases or explosions, either.

I'm one of the few who doesn't care too much whether the cover art is good or bad, as long as the movie inside looks great. I like good DVD and Blu-ray cover art, but I don't display it in frames on my wall for all to see, the way I sometimes did with vinyl album covers. AFAIC, the upcoming...

One would have stay awfully still while watching -- be like watching an ocean skyline through a porthole during a bad storm, no?

Okay. Got me again! :rolleyes:

I can see how 1.33 would be preferred by many -- so many small details are missing from the widescreen framing. I really think a choice would have been better. Anamorphic improves resolution. I think it can even be used when authoring 1.33 films (?). Still, a choice, please.

PM sent. P.S. Whoops...a little late!

Do they ever? They're not known to speak up in this forum. Perhaps on their own blog and forum.

Could be, Philip. I know that Kubrick had an affinity for the Academy ratio even up to his death, so it isn't beyond possibility. However, we do not have any testimony from either Lean or his biographers that I know about (I have several books about him) to that effect, at least not in print...