Search results

Personally, this looks to me like typical survival of the weakest survivor. Next 3 out: Reynold, Eddie, and Eric.

Stan, you've got a much different perspective than I do. I see Dawn as being completely trustworthy TO HER ALLIANCE. She has thus far only done what I would hope my alliance members would do. Let the rest of the alliance know when members are turning against "us". Granted Corrine and...

I think Phil sticks around because everybody wants to sit next to him at final tribal.

I don't see Phillip as a bully, as much as I see him trying to play a character. The character is his vision of Boston Rob. Brandon wants to be a bully one minute, then he wants to be the victim, then he wants to be a hero, then he wants to be the victim, then he wants to be the mastermind...

Not sure if serious.

At the end you gotta sit next to someone.

While winning certainly is not the only characteristic when I judge which players I enjoy/hate watching, when we start to discuss "greatest" or "best", I feel winning has to be the first consideration.

I consider Amber's win to be part Robs win also. But what makes Rob really great is that he got BETTER, not worse. The more players knew about him, the better he played. Quote: Great quote, Mike. This almost exactly states my thoughts, too.

The object of this game is to win. In order to win, you need to NOT PISS YOUR OWN TEAM OFF. Russell, and apparently, some members of this discussion, have never grasped this fact. The whole point of "Survivor" is to get votes at the end. If you've never won, you are NOT great. IMNSHO...

IMHO, Russell Hantz is a great player only in his own mind, and the minds of those who truly don't understand the game. He has NEVER come close to winning. Being dragged to the final vote by the winner only because EVERYONE HATES YOU was never a good strategy. Please don't try to claim...