Search results

In a word: no. The primitive 1989 colorization was carried out in standard definition on a poor quality public domain print. The various DVD editions already display it in all its dubious glory and a transfer to BD would not improve it one iota. Any colorization worth its salt would have to be...

A brief interjection: David, I hope you didn't think anyone was piling on you as it's clear you both bought that Spanish BD-R and posted its details in good faith. I assume you were previously unaware of the myriad issues surrounding many classic film releases, but especially those from Italy...

This BD is a pirate from Llamentol. Much discussed and acknowledged here and elsewhere, they're one of the worst companies for it and don't have a single legit release in their inventory. This isn't just a way to get a cheaper, vanilla version of a legit release, albeit with lower bitrate...

Because they're cheap. It's a public domain copy and isn't costing them anything.

I appreciate the effort you've gone to on this Tony, but your continued combining of specs and faults for all three BDs is making my head hurt trying to figure out which is which! Can you please just simply detail the specs and A/V issues for each release separately, noting what is wrong with...

It's not just you Tony: I was convinced I'd read at least one in-depth thread on the shortcomings of the various ACC BDs on this site, but several searches, using different terms, failed to turn them up for me either.'Tis a great shame that the latest BD still has flawed A/V and looks likely for...

I've yet to pick this up on BD and would be grateful if someone could clarify once and for all the names, exact spec and A/V differences between the (three?) releases. If they can be posted here I'll make sure this comparison gets updated: http://www.dvdcompare.net/comparisons/film.php?fid=19443