Search results

Thanks. I just always thought that 35mm film was supposed to have more 'resolution' than could even be resolved with a 2k (1080p) scan/encoding. And that a 4K scan is required to really capture ALL of the detail present in the original 35mm photography. The review just reminded me of my...

What do you mean that the film "was never 4k to begin with"? If it was shot on 35mm FILM then it should have the analog equivalent of 3840x2160 lines of digital resolution? And wasn't this 4K disc produced from a new 4K scan of the original 35mm film, meaning that it essentially came form a...