Search results

I have reviewed this title and have found this thread to be interesting. In short, I found the picture to be superb and the audio almost as good. It is amazing how good 1953 sound elements can be mixed to multichannel. As far as the color, I was not even born in 1953 so needless to say, I have...

I agree with the review almost entirely although I would say it should be more like a 2 or 2.5 as a film not 3. The film has a superb audio presentation, simply superb. The video, other than the dumb teal tint, is very good although a bit soft in spots. The editing is terrible, with a ton of...

Too much too soon. In a phase, that sums up the whole issue for me. As with 3D, it is too early for yet another new format. In a span of just a handful of years, we will have Blu-ray, 3D Blu-ray and then 4K? HD sets, 3D sets and then 4K? A year or 2 after 4K sets are out, the CE companies will...

I am no fan of 3D but it seems to me that for it to be a big success, it will have to be glasses free. At that point, it will be just like watching TV. I will not sit around for hours watching TV with glasses over my glasses. I have NO interest in 3D with glasses, active or otherwise. As for...

This release looks and sounds superb. I really couldn't be happier with the look and sound here. I can't for the life of me see what all the fuss is about.

I have quite a collection of films on BD as a reviewer and enjoy the Blu-ray experience immensely. However, I agree that the future of all content distribution, both audio and video is via downloads. The quality of audio downloads via lossless is now superior to that of CD's. It didn't take that...