Search results for query: *

I have seen some posts over the internet from people who have received their sets, and the general consensus is that it is great even though a handful of cartoons have redone titles. That said, the sales of this set are perhaps being hampered by the number of people either waiting for a...

The strange and ironic thing is that I bet that there are some funko enthusiasts out there thinking, "Why must I pay extra for those worthless discs when all I want is the funko. I wish I could just buy the funko by itself at an appropriately reduced price." C'est la vie. I would like to take a...

I tend to agree. My "line in sand" is fifty dollars, and I've based that on what I've paid for WAC's three Popeye discs (actually, that would be a few dollars less, but I'm trying to be reasonable). Anything above that is inflation caused by the Funko as far as I am concerned, and I'm not paying...

Again, I'm not interested in playing Pawn Stars. All WB has to do is just sell me the discs for their market value alone. They can keep their valuable psedo-Beanie Baby and do with it as they please. This isn't rocket science. I'm only asking for the SOP that has been in play for a few decades...

At a certain point, you just have to be stubborn. Fifty dollars is my line in the sand. There are so many other releases right now that I can get without the nuisance and hassle that I'm just not inclined to deal with Warner's non-sense. So it looks like I'll be spending my Christmas with Tex...

I'm not rooting for this set to fail, but if that happens, the hopeful silver lining would be that Warner will finally pass on the entire Looney Tunes catalog to WAC. Then we can get decent releases that aren't attached to figurines that look like they're going through narcotics withdrawal...

The minute I can buy a non-junk box version at a price comparable to what I would pay for the three WAC Popeye blu-rays I'll be happy to add this set to my collection. Until then, that ugly funko can go pound sand.