Why do you say "Temple of Doom SUPPOSEDLY happened first in the chronology"? There is no supposedly about it. Raiders clearly says onscreen 1936 and Temple of Doom clearly says onscreen 1935. No, Temple of Doom definitely happened first in the chronology, and since Indy knew Short Round in 1935...
My guess, as happens with most divorces, is that Marion is living in the idyllic Jones residence and the husband is renting a small apartment close to the university.
It's already happened. Peter Cushing in "Rogue One." Carrie Fisher in "Rogue One" and "The Rise of Skywalker." Those are movies that had those actors in them after they were gone.
Yes, I wanted to see a happy-go-lucky Indy surrounded with his antiques, loving life after the death of his son and the end of his marriage. Or are those not allowed to be plot points either?
Not when you've essentially given up. And seeing Sallah like what???
I also really doubt anyone sobbed at poor Indy's plight. And no, not every movie is purely an escape. Thank God some movies are actually about something.
Saw it tonight. Disagree a great deal with the negative reviews. I thought it was a great time at the movies. Harrison Ford WAS Indy through and through. Unlike some others, I thought the action scenes were great, though they did tend to go on a bit long. I loved the payoff and I really loved...