Search results

The webmaster of the site I mentioned (Justin Kerswell) e-mailed me and is excited that we're getting things started on this film again. Here's what he e-mailed me after reading my post here: I did hold out some hope that the director may have an uncut 35mm master of the film but, according to...

Agreed, Christina. MGM has the best solution to this problem. Dressed to Kill was released with both versions. Paramount could and should do the same for its horror titles. They wouldn't even have to advertise "CONTAINS ORIGINAL UNCUT VERSION" on the front of the box. Just in the small...

And, for anyone interested. Here are four pictures from the Director's Cut print that I found at that same website... Link Removed Link Removed Link Removed Link Removed Very, very interesting indeed.

I started thinking about this title again last night and I was wondering if Mr. Blythe could give us some kind of update (not on a release date) but on the current situation involving the film's original Director's Cut print and restoration for DVD transfer. How is the condition of the print...

It'd be nice to see My Bloody Valentine in Feb. around Valentine's Day, but if waiting on an uncut release means waiting till October around Halloween, I'll gladly wait. This is the first good horror DVD news I've heard all month long. Three cheers for Paramount...as long as they're Director's...

Why not release this as a test to see how well Uncut/Director's Cut movies sell for Paramount? Release this in Feb. around Valentine's Day, follow it up with an April release of April Fool's Day, and then go ahead with Director's cut releases of Friday the 13th Part VII and VII in the Fall...