Recent content by Zachary Cohen

Funny, as I have been wanting to purchase this for awhile and actually checked DeepDiscountDVD to see if they had it for cheaper than the absolutely absurd price it is selling every where else. It wasn't listed. I also got the e-mail, and once again it's not listed. When I go to the page it...

Didn't we have admins deleting posts and threatening to ban members of the forum in the "Fahrenheit 9/11" and "Outfoxed" DVD threads when people started criticizing the films and their makers?

Thanks. I'll be picking it up in that case.

I own the first three seasons of Oz but there was a question I had about the fourth season, but I couldn't find any reviews anywhere. Anyway, the first three seasons were 8 hours a piece and were on three discs. The fourth season is twice the length (16 hours), but, as far as I can tell, is...

I was JUST about to type that. Heh.

double post. sorry.

It is two DVDs plus the soundtrack CD.

Oh well, of course, because all TV-DVDs cost the same to produce and are priced the same. Right?

Yes, quite a struggle Moore had to release the picture. By 'struggle', I assume you mean "1. The instance in which a huge corporation gives someone $6 million to produce a film, then tells them a year before the release date that they will need to find a new distributor, which said filmmaker does."

This REALLY pisses me off. I got screwed on "Meaning of Life" because I didnt read the reviews but I read the reviews on all the major sites and NO ONE MENTIONED IT! Do DVD reviewers even pay attention to what they are watching? I am really irritated.

I wrote above that I had no problem with DigitalBits doing this, as they need to pay their bandwidth bills and whatnot. This, however, is a whole different story:

The only thing that really ticks me off about these ads is getting ones for products that I've already bought. IMDB has been waging a full out assault on my computer letting me know that Clerks 10th Anniversary, which I have already purchased, is now on DVD.

So it's not a digipack? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

What you dont mention is that TvShowsOnDvd also says that it was shot for 1.37:1.

I'm sorry, I did not mean to say that the widescreen version was cropped but that it simply was not the correct aspect ratio. It probably does have more information on the sides which means that although it was shot in widescreen it was intended for 1.37:1, similar to how 1.85 films will be shot...