Recent content by Todd J Moore

Interesting thread idea. There are movies I didn't particularly like such as Citizen Kane and Avatar that I've at least kicked around the idea of watching again. But as to films that I'm just done with, well: Joker--yeah, it's technically a good movie but I never need to see it again and I'm...

I'm a bit snobbish now and don't do anaglyph anymore. I looked at a minute or two in anaglyph just for kicks before settling down and watching the whole thing in digital 3D. I watched it on a 100-inch screen roughly 12 feet away from it. It looked quite beautiful and sharp to me.

Did not notice any such issues. Looked beautiful on my projector.

Got this 3D Blu Ray and watched it last night. What a terrific restoration! This looks much better than it did at the World 3D Film Expos I saw it at. Very good depth, especially in the outdoor scenes and no misalignment. The out of the screen effects are fun, too, especially the scene with the...

The great irony of the Serial Squadron is that the owner spent years lecturing the members of the message boards about bootleg videos and loudly claiming VCI and Alpha were dirty pirates. This, of course, is because Alpha and VCI were competition to him. Actually, anyone who had any involvement...

Mr. Harris, I can tell you the problems people in that other thread had. First, by your own admission, 3D is not your area of expertise. You also seemed to suggest that misalignment should not be corrected. I can tell you from personal experience that misalignment in 3D causes massive headaches...

40 years ago when I first saw a 3D movie (Revenge of the Creature on local channel 48), if you had told me that not only would I see almost all of the 1950s 3D films in 3D like they were meant to be seen, but that I would own a bunch of them that way, I never would have believed you. But here we...

I finally got to see this today. I was too busy earlier in the summer and got really sick late in the summer, but my local AMC had it as a $5 Fan Fave, so I decided to check it out. Earlier this summer I watched the original for the first time in 30 years and got a kick out of it. Yes, the...

And you would be wrong. There was no fit throwing, no vitriol, and no shenanigans. RAH stated that he felt DW was practically 2D. I stated that I felt that statement was wrong since I had seen it twice at the Egyptian. I felt the film was as three dimensional as any other film from that time...

As much as I want more 3D titles from WAC, I think I want more classic animation more. If they could finish off the Popeye series and put out more Looney Tunes, I'd be delighted.

A couple of things to bear in mind: Avatar was the first really wide 3D release of that decade outside of the two anaglyphic features so it was the first time mass audiences really got to see polarized 3D since the 80s. All the others had a limited 3D release. Chicken Little opened in 85...

Three major reasons: 1)Every 3D movie from 1966-1997 sucked. 2)Many of them were poorly shot. 3)Despite the belief that single strip systems would solve the misprojection problems dual strip 3D movies had, they absolutely did not. I know people are going to give me a thumbs down for the first...

Mercifully for 3D fans, Universal, Paramount and MGM saw it differently. I've seen Gog before the 3DFA restoration and I saw it after. Their restoration of that film alone--which makes it look like it was released yesterday--is reason enough for Warners to let the 3DFA have a crack at their titles.

My 3D TV is 10 years old so I decided to futureproof it by getting a 3D projector. I'll probably get a second projector to have on hand. No way I'm losing my ability to watch my 3D movies.

I don't necessarily think anyone is suggesting WB allow the 3DFA and/or KIno to release 3D blu rays of their titles. However, farming out the restoration of the 3D titles to 3DFA so the WA could release it might be the way to go since the 3DFA can do marvelous things on lower budgets. The other...