Trolling??? Grow up, it has too much DNR and is too sharpened for my liking, it's my opinion based on my preference and is no less valid than yours.
You like that the ball is still missing, and once again the colours have been changed? You like that detail is missing and is over sharp?
It's the same bad snakewater Universal have been selling since Jaws.
Just like the Thing, as it is a little better than the old disc, does not make it good.
Breakfast Club and Jaws had issues people overlooked as they didn't look like their old discs.
This is the same thing, and a film that...
This is the Mike and Dave review, I was mentioning that movie.
I had not realised everything has focused on the 2001 part of your review.
You imply that there is more detail on disc then seen theatrically, this is wrong in this case.
It's not a photochemical dupe
Universal are clueless, people went nuts for Jaws and seeing that on the big screen before the disc hit showed the smearing and trails.
It's a shame that since universal screwed the original releases this and the Thing are given a pass as they are "better"
Sad really, it's like when people...
So my fair lady is not ok for HDR but Sony going all revionist on the audio and video is fine?
And the audio is placed where it should be?
Yeah everyone in the 80s loved that object based roof array sound
Do as I say don't do as I do?
IF TFE is really from the OCN why is the framing so close to the last master? It looks like the scan was from an Anamorphic IP at least a gen away.
Also why is it shapened?
The Gaumont has more detail and no sharpening, sure the contrast is a mess and the highlights blown but there is no way...