Recent content by Albert_M

For me, having real ghosts etc is worse than Scrappy. It totally changes the dynamic of the show.

Bond movies tend to have some reflection of their time, whether it be 60s cold war, the various and obvious genres that 70s Bond films went into.... 80s Miami Vice, 90s Micheal Bey cartoons and post 9/11 darker stuff. It will be interesting to see one though next that's not a set up or biography...

That statement explains a lot. Basically Bond movies have sucked because time moved on and it's not the 60s anymore is a brief way of explaining it. It's too bad that some want the same tired formula.

I picked up the set from DeepDiscount a few weeks ago for under $90. Not sure what it is now, but worth comparing.

judging by the awful, awful reviews of the new Die Hard, I'm not sure a newer "complete" collection will be all that desirable....

Skyfall and probably will grab one or two old Bonds that I haven't picked up yet for BB's $7.99 price.

Oh Jesus. :rolleyes:

Seriously a DVD is unacceptable??

I would love Hold that Ghost.

It's not reasonable. I stated my views on that matter. Read it again until you can grasp them.

I didn't say that I didn't like 3D. I said as you quoted I'll be happy to see the gimmick end. My comment is relevant to the over use of it. The sour grapes comments don't even make any sense. Neither does the DVD analogy.

Wow, a lot of strawmen here.

That's true. It wasn't.

:confused: :confused: Well that's some hyperbole and it's also a response to something else, as it's not a response to what I wrote.

Seriously, opening it up that everything - all films are gimmicks? Come on. I don't think that's a great argument. I don't really think it's that hard to digest - some people don't want to wear glasses to see something fly at them for 2 hours, let alone pay more than the already high cost to see...