3 Stars

818I8jtgglL._SY679_.

The price link below will take you directly to the product on Amazon. If you are using an adblocker you will not see link.

Published by

Ronald Epstein

administrator

Worth

Cinematographer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2009
Messages
3,647
Real Name
Nick Dobbs
Is this 4:3 or 16:9? I've seen HD broadcasts that were 16:9.
 
Last edited:

Ron Lee Green

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 24, 2004
Messages
1,004
Is this 4:3 or 16:9? I've see no HD broadcasts that were 16:9.
The product page says Aspect Ratio: Fullscreen (1.33:1) (which is 4:3).
https://www.millcreekent.com/charlies-angels-complete.html

BTW, there is a youtube video of the opening theme on their product page, but it is an old fan-made video that's been around for a couple years and should not be a representation of what the Blu Ray picture quality will look like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Osato

dstrong

Agent
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
37
Real Name
Damon
The pre-order price on the Canadian Amazon site is only $134.08 Canadian, which in American dollars is approximately $100 American. I just might pre-order it at that price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Osato

Ron1973

Beverly Hillbilles nut extraordinaire
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
2,513
Location
SE Missouri
Real Name
Ron Reagan (not that one!)
The week of launch it will most likely be $70 at Amazon, with a price of under $50 a few months after.
I might consider biting for that price, under $50, and give my son the complete set of DVD's I have. He's been watching it on Me-TV some. I figure he'd like that.
 

Radioman970

Lead Actor
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
7,884
Location
Could be anywhere
Real Name
James Perry
I'm slow moving on my dvds. they don't look half bad so I probably won't go with blu ray unless I get a skipper. LOTS of show I don't have. come on mill creek!!
 

DaveHof3

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Feb 28, 2016
Messages
158
Real Name
David Hofstede
I'm guessing there's no chance that they'll do the complete "Angels in Paradise," "Angels on Ice," "Angels in Vegas," etc. instead of the syndicated part 1 & 2 like in the previous sets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Osato

Ron1973

Beverly Hillbilles nut extraordinaire
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
2,513
Location
SE Missouri
Real Name
Ron Reagan (not that one!)
I would like them to digitally remove Shelley Hack and then I’ll buy it.
She grew on me about halfway through the 4th season. I dreaded watching S4 because of her as I "seemed to remember" how bad she was from watching reruns. Let's look at it this way: she replaced a fan favorite in Kate Jackson. Replacements are hardly ever looked upon as good. When Coy and Vance replaced Bo and Luke, yeah, nobody was thrilled with that. Had Shelley been there originally, people might feel different. If she had been given another season to develop her character, she might be looked at more favorably. Tanya Roberts, for me, was the weak spot. She was easy on the eyes, but her acting left much to be desired, plus the plots were getting thin by S5.
 

sjbradford

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
114
Real Name
sjbradford
I will agree that Tanya was worse than Shelley (though I thought Tanya was great in That 70s Show). Part of the problem with Shelley was that the producers started doing episodes that season that focused on a single Angel, rather than the three of them working a case together. So Shelley didn’t have as much of a chance to develop chemistry with the others. I still thought she was an odd choice, though.