3 Stars

Let me count the ways I love this movie. The script is absolutely wonderful. It was Nicholas Meyer’s first film as director and it shows – he’s awkward, frequently has no clue what to do with a shot or where to put the camera, the effects are cheesy as can be, and yet I don’t care – I love it from start to finish. And one of the main reasons is that he gives us characters to love and to hate, but even the villain here has real depth. The leading players are all fantastic – some of the supporting players are not but again I don’t care.

The transfer on the Warner Archive Blu-ray is better than the DVD but it’s not going to win any awards, I’m afraid. It’s downright blurry at times, too soft, and lacking in detail. It’s not the production photography, which was very good and NOT soft. Still, the movie’s the thing and I’m really happy to have it.

Post Disclaimer

Some of our content may contain marketing links, which means we will receive a commission for purchases made via those links. In our editorial content, these affiliate links appear automatically, and our editorial teams are not influenced by our affiliate partnerships. We work with several providers (currently Skimlinks and Amazon) to manage our affiliate relationships. You can find out more about their services by visiting their sites.

Published by

Kevin Collins

administrator

GlennF

Supporting Actor
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
500
Location
Toronto, Canada
Real Name
Glenn Frost
It's interesting that the master they use on TCM HD has the same "out of focus/blurry" thing happening -particularly around the edges of the picture.
 

TonyD

Who do we think I am?
Premium
Ambassador
Joined
Dec 1, 1999
Messages
21,414
Location
Gulf Coast
Real Name
Tony D.
I watched it on TCM the other day and didn't notice the fuzzy edges or whatever it was that was fuzzy.

Was a fan of this when I was younger but now it doesn't hold up for me.
Watched it and after I just felt nothing.
I love time travel stories but too many questions now that I didn't notice before.
 

Keith Cobby

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
2,926
Location
Kent "The Garden of England", UK
Real Name
Keith Cobby
Watched this today for the first time for many years. The blu-ray presentation is OK but the film was not as good as I remembered. The two male leads were unconvincing time travellers although Mary Steenburgen was wonderful as always.
 

Stephen_J_H

All Things Film Junkie
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
6,550
Location
North of the 49th
Real Name
Stephen J. Hill
I have the DVD, which looks fine, but I was looking at screencaps [let the pillorying begin....]. and what I see there is what looks like it could be one of three things: vignetting at the edges [which I assume it is not], that the IP used for the release was curling up on the sides [which should have been caught at the scanning phase], or an improperly made IP with the focus issues baked in. I'm leaning towards #3. Even the estimable WB is not infallible.
 

bigshot

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Messages
2,926
Real Name
Stephen
It was a little fuzzy in theaters too. I think they were trying to hide actors' wrinkles or something.
 

Douglas R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2000
Messages
2,496
Location
London, United Kingdom
Real Name
Doug
The film has great memories for me because I saw during my first visit to New York in October 1979 and the audience clearly loved it. I don't remember it looking at all "fuzzy".
 

Tino

Premium
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 19, 1999
Messages
19,453
Location
Metro NYC
Real Name
Valentino
Yeah. I saw it multiple times in the theaters during its original run and it definitely wasn’t “fuzzy”.
 

haineshisway

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
5,018
Location
Los Angeles
Real Name
Bruce
It wasn't fuzzy in theaters at all - there were some filters used on some close-ups but that's it - what's at play in this transfer is simply out of focus, not fuzzy.
 

Rick Thompson

Screenwriter
Joined
Jul 1, 2008
Messages
1,742
I really enjoyed it. Time travel movies are not to be taken seriously -- Time Machine (which takes itself v-e-r-y seriously) to the contrary. This one is fun. The only time travel flix I enjoyed more are the original Back to the Future, Star Trek IV and Timeline. (And why isn't that on blu? Oops, I forgot -- it's Paramount!)
 
Last edited:

Keith Cobby

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
2,926
Location
Kent "The Garden of England", UK
Real Name
Keith Cobby
I really enjoyed it. Time travel movies are not to be taken seriously -- Time Machine (which takes itself v-e-r-y seriously) to the contrary. This one is fun. The only time travel flix I enjoyed more are the original Back to the Future, Star Trek IV and Timeline. (And why isn't that on blu? Oops, I forgot -- it's Paramount!)

Another entertaining time travel film is Timestalkers (TV 1987)..
 

Johnny Angell

Played With Dinosaurs Member
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 13, 1998
Messages
13,517
Location
Central Arkansas
Real Name
Johnny Angell
Let me count the ways I love this movie. The script is absolutely wonderful. It was Nicholas Meyer's first film as director and it shows - he's awkward, frequently has no clue what to do with a shot or where to put the camera, the effects are cheesy as can be, and yet I don't care - I love it from start to finish. And one of the main reasons is that he gives us characters to love and to hate, but even the villain here has real depth. The leading players are all fantastic - some of the supporting players are not but again I don't care.

The transfer on the Warner Archive Blu-ray is better than the DVD but it's not going to win any awards, I'm afraid. It's downright blurry at times, too soft, and lacking in detail. It's not the production photography, which was very good and NOT soft. Still, the movie's the thing and I'm really happy to have it.
I agree totally with your evaluation of the story and characters. Malcom McDowel, David Warner, and Mary Steenburgen are all very good. Hard to believe that Warner also played Bob Cratchet in my favorit Christmas Carol (the TV production with George C. Scott.) I liked that the disbelieving police were portrayed sympathetically.
I really enjoyed it. Time travel movies are not to be taken seriously -- Time Machine (which takes itself v-e-r-y seriously) to the contrary. This one is fun. The only time travel flix I enjoyed more are the original Back to the Future, Star Trek IV and Timeline. (And why isn't that on blu? Oops, I forgot -- it's Paramount!)
Time Machine is very effective. If it takes itself seriously, I don’t mind.