A few words about…™ The Curse of Frankenstein – in Blu-ray

The Curse of Frankenstein, release in May of 1957 in the UK, and shortly thereafter in The Colonies, was a WB / Hammer film, and hence filmed in the ubiquitous WarnerColor process, which can be quite good at time, with the exception of dupes, or extremely problematic.

Fortunately, Curse falls into “better.”

The new master for Warner Archive’s Blu-ray is based upon new scans of the separation masters, and the resultant data files seem to accurately reflect the appearance of the original, with just a touch of softness from the generation loss.

It’s the best that I’ve seen the film look since its original release.

As everyone knows there are decisions to be made in releasing a Blu-ray, and occasionally aspects ratios raise their ugly heads. Which to use? Where was it screened under what conditions? Are we losing anything important in the crop from 1.37?

Warner Archive has taken the coward’s way out. Not wishing to rile the populace into taking torches to the streets, the film is offered in a two-disc set.

The first contains the feature selectively in both 1.85, as well as 1.66 aspect ratio, while the second allows viewing in (the also fully restored) 1.37 open matte version.

One top of that, disc two is filled with extras befitting those who might bring a creature to life.

I believe a few folks may have been waiting for this one.

Horror of Dracula, to the dismay of UK censors, arrived two years hence.

Image – 4.25

Audio – 5

Pass / Fail – Pass

Upgrade from DVD – Yes

Highly Recommended

RAH

Robert has been known in the film industry for his unmatched skill and passion in film preservation. Growing up around photography, his first home theater experience began at age ten with 16mm. Years later he was running 35 and 70mm at home.

His restoration projects have breathed new life into classic films like Lawrence of Arabia, Vertigo, My Fair Lady, Spartacus, and The Godfather series. Beyond his restoration work, he has also shared his expertise through publications, contributing to the academic discourse on film restoration. The Academy Film Archive houses the Robert A. Harris Collection, a testament to his significant contributions to film preservation.

Post Disclaimer

Some of our content may contain marketing links, which means we will receive a commission for purchases made via those links. In our editorial content, these affiliate links appear automatically, and our editorial teams are not influenced by our affiliate partnerships. We work with several providers (currently Skimlinks and Amazon) to manage our affiliate relationships. You can find out more about their services by visiting their sites.

Share this post:

View thread (58 replies)

Alan Tully

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2008
Messages
4,645
Location
London
Real Name
Alan
Great! I'll take 4.25 & "It's the best that I've seen the film look since its original release". This was never going to look like it was shot yesterday. I've already pre-ordered it (I think it'll be 1:66 for me).
 

aPhil

Supporting Actor
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
902
Location
North Carolina
Real Name
Phil Smoot
Great news. I’ve pre-ordered 3 copies so far!

As to "Horror of Dracula, to the dismay of UK censors, arrived two years hence.” -- Don’t you mean 1 year hence?
 

JoshZ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
2,291
Location
Boston
Real Name
Joshua Zyber
Warner Archive has taken the coward's way out. Not wishing to rile the populace into taking torches to the streets, the film is offered in a two-disc set.

The first contains the feature selectively in both 1.85, as well as 1.66 aspect ratio, while the second allows viewing in (the also fully restored) 1.37 open matte version.

So, the same thing Criterion did for On the Waterfront.
 

JoshZ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
2,291
Location
Boston
Real Name
Joshua Zyber
Precisely, except Criterion's On the Waterfront is (as I recall) two versions, 1.85 and 1.33(sic).

Curse is 1.37, 1.66 and 1.85.

On the Waterfront had those same three ratios, with 1.66:1 given primacy on the first disc.
 

JoshZ

Senior HTF Member
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
2,291
Location
Boston
Real Name
Joshua Zyber

waterfront.jpg
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,407
Real Name
Robert Harris
Why would they release it in 1.37 when it was NEVER shown that way in any movie theater? To appear some wacko people who saw it on TV? I don't get it.
Because a number of shots appear overly cropped.
 
Last edited:

Josh Steinberg

Premium
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
26,382
Real Name
Josh Steinberg
Why would they release it in 1.37 when it was NEVER shown that way in any movie theater? To appear some wacko people who saw it on TV? I don't get it.

Genre films like this sell disproportionately well compared to catalog sales in general due to the enthusiasm of the horror fan base and that fan base is big on the nostalgia part of the experience - including nostalgia for how they first viewed the film. The inclusion of the open matte version will boost sales, while not including it might have diminished them. Warner is banking on the idea that the extra fifty cents in costs an extra disc adds to the package will be outweighed by horror collectors committing fully to the release. And based on prior sales of horror titles, I don’t think they’re wrong. That passionate fan base (with all of the quirks included within) has real buying power in a rapidly declining market. There’s a reason labels like Vinegar Syndrome are thriving while labels like Twilight Time are folding and it’s because this kind of content can still move thousands or tens of thousands of units while catalog titles in other genres struggle to move hundreds of units.
 

aPhil

Supporting Actor
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
902
Location
North Carolina
Real Name
Phil Smoot
Genre films like this sell disproportionately well compared to catalog sales in general due to the enthusiasm of the horror fan base and that fan base is big on the nostalgia part of the experience - including nostalgia for how they first viewed the film. The inclusion of the open matte version will boost sales, while not including it might have diminished them. Warner is banking on the idea that the extra fifty cents in costs an extra disc adds to the package will be outweighed by horror collectors committing fully to the release. And based on prior sales of horror titles, I don’t think they’re wrong. That passionate fan base (with all of the quirks included within) has real buying power in a rapidly declining market. There’s a reason labels like Vinegar Syndrome are thriving while labels like Twilight Time are folding and it’s because this kind of content can still move thousands or tens of thousands of units while catalog titles in other genres struggle to move hundreds of units.

I agree.

What I don't understand is why anyone should complain with getting 3 aspect ratios on 2 Blu-ray discs --
Especially when the disc that contains only 1 aspect ratio is the disc with the Extras --
as this seems very smart . . .
(as some companies try to cram too much onto a single disc and still never give us the truly most optimal aspect ratio — I might refer to a certain company that will put 1.85 & 1.66 European versions on a single disc filled with Extras but never give the most centrally composed aspect ratio of 1.75).

I am not one to ask for less when more is offered.

I am grateful to Warner for responding to fans and collectors — Keep it coming — Please do more!
(like, do this kind of restoration for "Horror of Dracula" and "The Mummy"
and get rid of that black crush on "Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed" and add "She" (1965 version) and . . .
Okay, I know, I'm crazy and obsessed so . . .
I'm out for now)
 

skylark68

Screenwriter
Joined
Apr 1, 2015
Messages
1,562
Location
Pearland, TX
Real Name
Timothy
Thank you for the excellent review. I will be blind buying this one. For some reason when I was a kid I had a mother who didn’t let me watch these types of films when they came on tv...
 

cadavra

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
783
Real Name
mike schlesinger
Genre films like this sell disproportionately well compared to catalog sales in general due to the enthusiasm of the horror fan base and that fan base is big on the nostalgia part of the experience - including nostalgia for how they first viewed the film. The inclusion of the open matte version will boost sales, while not including it might have diminished them. Warner is banking on the idea that the extra fifty cents in costs an extra disc adds to the package will be outweighed by horror collectors committing fully to the release. And based on prior sales of horror titles, I don’t think they’re wrong. That passionate fan base (with all of the quirks included within) has real buying power in a rapidly declining market. There’s a reason labels like Vinegar Syndrome are thriving while labels like Twilight Time are folding and it’s because this kind of content can still move thousands or tens of thousands of units while catalog titles in other genres struggle to move hundreds of units.

Well, the reason TT folded is because Nick Redman passed away and his widow was not in a position to keep it going.
 

titch

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Messages
2,308
Real Name
Kevin Oppegaard
Precisely, except Criterion's On the Waterfront is (as I recall) two versions, 1.85 and 1.33(sic).

Curse is 1.37, 1.66 and 1.85.
The UK StudioCanal 4K The Ladykillers disc has both 1.37:1 and 1.66:1 versions - I prefer the 1.37. If you want to see an outstanding three strip Technicolor restoration, you need to check that one out.
 
Most Popular