On July 3, Criterion is releasing their new Blu-ray set of the six Hollywood (Paramount) productions that came from the talents of Marlene Dietrich, under the direction of Josef von Sternberg.
They had worked previously in Germany, under the UFA banner for the 1930 The Blue Angel, in which she appeared with Emil Jannings.
The six films are:
Morocco – 1930 – Gary Cooper / Adolphe Menjou – Lee Garmes
Dishonored – 1931 – Victor McLaglen / Gustav von Seyffertitz / Warner Oland – Lee Garmes
Shanghai Express – 1932 – Clive Brook / Anna May Wong / Warner Oland / Eugene Pallette – Lee Garmes
Blonde Venus – 1932 – Herbert Marshall / Cary Grant – Bert Glennon
The Scarlet Empress – 1934 – John Lodge / Sam Jaffe / Louise Dressser – Bert Glennon
The Devil is a Woman – 1935 – Lionel Atwill / Edward Everett Horton – von Sternberg
The importance of this release cannot be overstated, for especially for those unaware, these are the films that “cinema” is all about – “The stuff that dreams are made of…”
Universal and Criterion have done a wonderful job in restoring the films, as the selection of elements isn’t exactly wonderful.
The original nitrate negatives to the black & white Paramount library were junked after a second set of safety fine grains were produced, decades ago.
Don’t ask why.
There was an earlier set, produced dry gate, which showed every bit of wear and tear from the elements’ history.
Reportedly, the first set had a superior image quality, short of the printed in damage, while the newer wet-gate set, had less than spectacular image quality.
From a more than cursory examination, the six films look far better than they should. Not spectacular, but still allowing us to see the extraordinary cinematography that still shines through.
I can’t speak to correct density or black levels, although they look fine, as I’d want to do an actual comparison, but anyone who purchased the set, should be thrilled with the final results.
Grain structure is fine, albeit with generations backed in.
Aspect ratios are correct, with the earliest two, being 1.19, Shanghai as 1.33, and the rest of the group at 1.37.
Beautifully cleaned.
The films were produced from a mix of safety fine grains, and nitrate prints – you can get the details in liner notes.
Not to sound like a TV commercial for a blender, but in the old days of 16mm film collecting, you could have paid $1,000 or more for a set of six prints, if you were able to locate them.
Now, you can own all six, along with a free perfect bound book about the films, for the low, low price of only $86.
That’s only $14 a film, for some of the greatest films ever produced.
While many people may be waiting for the release of 2001 in 4k, this offering as just as important, and will be one of the major classic releases of 2018.
Image – 4
Audio – 5
Pass / Fail – Pass
Upgrade from DVD – You’d better believe it!
Very Highly Recommended
RAH
Post Disclaimer
Some of our content may contain marketing links, which means we will receive a commission for purchases made via those links. In our editorial content, these affiliate links appear automatically, and our editorial teams are not influenced by our affiliate partnerships. We work with several providers (currently Skimlinks and Amazon) to manage our affiliate relationships. You can find out more about their services by visiting their sites.
Published by
Danny Burk
Second Unit
ahollis
dana martin
the screen test that launched that stuff that dreams are made of
warnerbro
Supporting Actor
Angelo Colombus
david hare
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2014
- Messages
- 559
- Real Name
- david hare
Peter McM
Screenwriter
Patrick McCart
I've only seen The Scarlet Empress (years ago), but I remember being in awe of the use of lighting.
And I've probably posted this before, but way back in 1959, "Famous Monsters of Filmland" magazine used to offer a 50-foot 8mm silent version of The Phantom of the Opera (and I suspect a pretty poor quality print) for $4.95 (or for $5.95 in 16mm). That works out to about 4 minutes of footage, depending upon the projection speed. That $4.95 in 1959 is $43 today and that $5.95 for the 16mm version is $51 in today's dollars. All for what amounts to a poor quality silent trailer and things you could see on YouTube and elsewhere today for free.
And yet we (including myself) complain about the price of Blu-ray discs. We've gotten very spoiled. It's really quite miraculous.
In addition, the other day was the 70th anniversary of the introduction of the LP by Columbia Records and tomorrow (the 28th) was the day the 1st LP was released. The first 12" LP released listed for $4.85 in 1948, which is $50.63 in today's dollars. But everyone thought the $14 CD was too expensive. It's amazing that the LP became a success at that price.
Danny Burk
Second Unit
I hope that's not correct. I can't imagine that no one was able to find that sequence - it was complete in the 16mm print that I had.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 1999
- Messages
- 13,714
- Real Name
- Robert Harris
What is the sequence?
- Joined
- Feb 8, 1999
- Messages
- 13,714
- Real Name
- Robert Harris
Suggest you check out Fun in a Chinese Laundry.
david hare
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2014
- Messages
- 559
- Real Name
- david hare
- Joined
- Feb 8, 1999
- Messages
- 13,714
- Real Name
- Robert Harris
SE was scanned at Universal from a dupe neg & fine grain.
Checking further.
Interestingly, a transcript of the missing lines can be found in an old discussion on the Criterion Forum.
All of that noted, I’d not have concerns about purchasing the set, as there should be an easy fix, presuming the footage survives in some form.
Danny Burk
Second Unit
It seems unimaginable that my print had the only surviving footage of this sequence, but there's a good chance that I could track it down if need be. I sold most of my 16mm prints to a good friend, and even 30+ years later, he probably still has it if he were indeed the buyer of that one. IIRC, the print was a very nice "original" (but with replaced dupe main titles); I don't remember the edge code but it was probably struck in the 50s or 60s.
warnerbro
Supporting Actor
david hare
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2014
- Messages
- 559
- Real Name
- david hare
Thanks RJH, the discussion over at Criterion was started by myself some years ago (ca. 2005?) when the French DVD versions of the Dietrichs followed suit with the 95 lasterdisc using the print with the cut. Sorry again for quoting PAL time, of course at 24 fps the shot starts at around 40 minutes. As you say the footage obviously exists in some other element but I was hoping this would have been the definitive opporunity for Universal to fix the problem. It's totally minor but I am disappointed.
Similar threads
