4 Stars

Dead of Night is an English omnibus production from Ealing Studios, probably best known to cinephiles as the home of the Alec Guinness comedies.

It’s finally arrived on Blu-ray, courtesy of Kino Lorber.

Producing many comedies and dramas, under the control of Michael Balcon, beginning in the late 1930s, and then war films, the subject of these words, Dead of Night (1945), is almost a prelude to what would come in the ’50s from Hammer. But for Ealing, it was an initial answer to what films to make after the war.

Interestingly, horror films were (after the German silent era) mostly an American thing, especially at Universal. Even many of the numerous horror productions taking place in the UK, were American productions.

Dead of Night is a little black & white film, with a tiny cast, directed by four gentlemen, who bring together four different tales of terror and the supernatural, wrapped around a central device.

That device involves an architect visiting a potential job site, and meeting people who have been in his dreams. What does it all mean? How does it come together?

That’s the fun of viewing the film.

The filmmakers and their sequences are:

Alberto Cavalcanti (billed as Cavalcanti), directing The Christmas Story and The Ventriloquist’s Dummy (used thereafter in other films);

Charles Crichton, the Golfing ghost story;

Basil Deardon, the linking narrative along with the Hearse Driver;

and

Robert Hamer, The Haunted Mirror.

Shot by Stan Pavey, and Douglas Slocombe – best to look up Mr. Slocombe, but a sampling of his films are:

The Captive Heart
Sarabandd
Whisky Galore
Kind Hearts and Coronets
The Lavender Hill Mob
The Man in the White Suit
The Titfield Thunderbot
The L-Shaped Room
The Servant
The Fearless Vampire Killers
The Lion in Winter
The Music Lovers
The Great Gatsby…

and then a few on this side of the pond:

Raiders of the Lost Ark
Never Say Never Again
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

A gentleman with a story.

Dead of Night is an interesting film. A good film. But not a great film.

In some ways it serves as a turning point in British cinema history.

Many in the cast are faces you’ll recognize from other British productions. The most recognizable to most viewers will be Michael Redgrave, and a very young Sally Ann Howes, probably best known as one Miss Truly Scrumptious, in that film about the flying car.

The film has been reported restored in 4k, but there are still numerous problems, inclusive of some lovely cut-through scratches, so apparently surviving original elements have seen better days.

There are no problems which impede the enjoyment of the film.

They simply are.

The track is less than stellar, and not always vibrant, but again, it is what it is, and it works.

Image – 3.25

Audio – 3.25

Pass / Fail – Pass

Upgrade from DVD – Definitely

Recommended

RAH

Published by

Robert Harris

editor,member

ahollis

Lead Actor
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
7,772
Reaction score
3,387
Points
9,110
Location
New Orleans
Real Name
Allen
I love this film and went region free DVD just for this film and Ghost Train. I think the Blu-Ray is great upgrade from the DVD.
 

atcolomb

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 19, 2009
Messages
1,782
Reaction score
1,568
Points
1,610
Location
Chicago Area
Real Name
Angelo
I went region free Blu-Ray years ago for a bunch of Ealing films like my favorite The Titfield Thunderbolt and The Man in the White Suit. Good news is that some will be released by Kino soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMF and ahollis

haineshisway

Producer
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
4,584
Reaction score
5,368
Points
4,110
Location
Los Angeles
Real Name
Bruce
I always have to laugh at this 4K malarky. Because you can transfer 8mm in 4K. It solely depends on WHAT the element is and that they're keeping mum on. From everything I've heard, this is not much of a step-up from the DVD.
 

Nick*Z

Screenwriter
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Messages
1,149
Reaction score
1,679
Points
1,610
Age
49
Location
Canada
Website
nixpixdvdmoviereviewsandmore.blogspot.ca
Real Name
NICK
Frankly, I was disappointed by the transfer; garbled sound, a lot of background hiss, and some edge enhancement effects that were VERY distracting. Overall, not a winner, in my opinion. The movie itself is a work of genius, sooooo deserving of better!
 

Robert Crawford

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 9, 1998
Messages
47,451
Reaction score
23,497
Points
9,110
Location
Michigan
Real Name
Robert
Frankly, I was disappointed by the transfer; garbled sound, a lot of background hiss, and some edge enhancement effects that were VERY distracting. Overall, not a winner, in my opinion. The movie itself is a work of genius, sooooo deserving of better!
At least, it's out on Blu-ray which isn't the case for many classic films. If you want more classics out on Blu-ray then there are going to be some BD titles that will come up a little short PQ-wise due to various circumstances including associated costs and film elements condition.
 
Last edited:

Thomas T

Producer
Joined
Sep 30, 2001
Messages
4,486
Reaction score
4,300
Points
4,110
There are no problems which impede the enjoyment of the film. They simply are ..... but again, it is what it is, and it works.

Upgrade from DVD - Definitely

Recommended

RAH
Sounds good enough for me, Mr. Harris! Your realistic attitude toward these problematic transfers is greatly appreciated.
 

Andrew Budgell

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 12, 2002
Messages
1,878
Reaction score
1,737
Points
1,610
Location
Ontario, Canada
Real Name
Andy Budgell
I'd never heard of this film prior to the Blu-ray annoucement. Sounds interesting... I'm going to pick it up this autumn.
 

Nick*Z

Screenwriter
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Messages
1,149
Reaction score
1,679
Points
1,610
Age
49
Location
Canada
Website
nixpixdvdmoviereviewsandmore.blogspot.ca
Real Name
NICK
At least, it's out on Blu-ray which isn't the case for many classic films. If you want more classics out on Blu-ray then there are going to be some BD titles that will come up a little short PQ-wise due to various circumstances including associated costs and film elements condition.
Dear Robert: I don't mind images that have been afforded less than total restoration. Light speckling is acceptable, as is minor dirt and scratches and the occasional gate weave or wobble. But the edge effects I mentioned have been 'added' in the 'remastering process'. Unacceptable, if you ask me. Don't artificially sharpen the image. It only creates distracting halos and other anomalies, easily avoided. I mean, come on. They spent money to have someone sharpen the image, but couldn't spend any to massage the strident and occasionally inaudible audio?!? Where do you think the money would have been better spent?
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
12,777
Reaction score
16,378
Points
9,110
Real Name
Robert Harris
I always have to laugh at this 4K malarky. Because you can transfer 8mm in 4K. It solely depends on WHAT the element is and that they're keeping mum on. From everything I've heard, this is not much of a step-up from the DVD.
The concept, and I’m in agreement, is that if no OCN survives, scan the best surviving in 4k. Doesn’t matter what resolution it may be
 

Dick

Lead Actor
Premium
Joined
May 22, 1999
Messages
8,420
Reaction score
5,132
Points
9,110
Real Name
Rick
Elsewhere I read that trying to eliminate long-running vertical scratches is extremely difficult and time-consuming (i.e. expensive), so the two that show up on this transfer would have resulted in unacceptable digital costs for Kino or whoever would have paid the price. I like this edition, and I owned the import, which does not have those scratches but also doesn't have the detail or contrast., imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thomas T and Jack K

Nick*Z

Screenwriter
Joined
Apr 30, 2003
Messages
1,149
Reaction score
1,679
Points
1,610
Age
49
Location
Canada
Website
nixpixdvdmoviereviewsandmore.blogspot.ca
Real Name
NICK
What's with the cover art for this movie - featuring a very predominant bat and skeleton - neither actually appearing in the movie. I understand producer, Michael Balcon was not interested in having Dead of Night perceived as a 'horror' movie because it would have faced strenuous censorship from the Brit censors. He was going for the supernatural/psycho-thriller aspects.