Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo

Shatner is denied director's cut for "Star Trek V" DVD


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
150 replies to this topic

#1 of 151 OFFLINE   Michael Allred

Michael Allred

    Screenwriter



  • 1,718 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2000
  • Real Name:Michael
  • LocationMI

Posted October 24 2002 - 08:00 AM

Taken from;

http://aint-it-cool-...ay.cgi?id=13642

If Shatner were allowed to re-cut the film and Paramount spent some moolah for new FX, "Star Trek V" could easily be a better film than it is now (how much better, I dunno.) Certainly such a project would elevate sales far beyond what a simple 2 disc special edition would cuz the movie would still be the same, which might be the most disliked film in the franchise.

I hope Paramount does indeed make a go of this and at least give Shatner the opportunity to make the film how he originally wanted to.

#2 of 151 OFFLINE   Paul McElligott

Paul McElligott

    Screenwriter



  • 2,598 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 02 2002

Posted October 24 2002 - 08:02 AM

It would be hard to make it worse. The question is how many of the missing scenses could be redone without reshooting.
R.I.P. DVDSpot

#3 of 151 OFFLINE   Jeremy Conrad

Jeremy Conrad

    Supporting Actor



  • 530 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 27 2000

Posted October 24 2002 - 08:21 AM

Glen used to work with us at IGN after he left AICN, and his info is always spot on.

He sent me the same email, but this was at the end of it:

"please don't use my name in association with it."

Nice to know AICN is so considerate Posted Image

#4 of 151 OFFLINE   Will K

Will K

    Screenwriter



  • 1,016 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 06 2001

Posted October 24 2002 - 08:24 AM

I would be shocked if Paramount were to actually pony-up the dough for a redux. If anything, bring in ILM to replace those gawd-awful Bran Ferran effects and at least make it look like it belongs among the other films. I don't know what footage would be restored or re-edited to really make it better, but I'd deepsix the Klingon belching at the very least.
My Blu-ray collection so far:Casino Royale, The Fifth Element, 300, Unforgiven, T2, The Descent, The Road Warrior, The Untouchables, Purple Rain, Deliverance

#5 of 151 OFFLINE   Jack Briggs

Jack Briggs

    Executive Producer



  • 16,727 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 03 1999

Posted October 24 2002 - 09:30 AM

"Row, row your boat ..." Posted Image

#6 of 151 OFFLINE   Michael Reuben

Michael Reuben

    Studio Mogul



  • 21,769 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 12 1998

Posted October 24 2002 - 09:37 AM

How about a CGI Sybok? Anything would be an improvement over Laurence Luckinbill. M.
COMPLETE list of my disc reviews.       HTF Rules / 200920102011 Film Lists

#7 of 151 OFFLINE   Steve Tannehill

Steve Tannehill

    Producer



  • 5,550 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 06 1997
  • Real Name:Steve Tannehill
  • LocationDFW

Posted October 24 2002 - 09:44 AM

If they removed the Uhura strip-tease, I might consider watching the movie again. - Steve

#8 of 151 OFFLINE   Brian Lawrence

Brian Lawrence

    Producer



  • 3,634 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 28 1998
  • Real Name:Brian

Posted October 24 2002 - 09:48 AM

I very much doubt that there is a gem of a film buried in this pile of garbage. Of course shortening the film in any way would be an improvement. Posted Image

#9 of 151 OFFLINE   Britton

Britton

    Supporting Actor



  • 904 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 03 2001

Posted October 24 2002 - 09:51 AM

Here's a starting list of what I would fix: 1) Replace and redo the god-awful space effects. 2) Cut the scene where Scotty hits his head on the bulkhead. 3) Use computers to change the deck numbers in the turbolift shaft when Kirk, Spock, and McCoy are being taken up via the rocket boots. The Enterprise-A wouldn't have that many decks. 4) Pull a Spielberg (as in the terrorist line in E.T.) and redub any mention taking the Enterprise into the center of the galaxy, which would take too long to get to via warp drive. Maybe replace it with the barrier at the edge of the galaxy, which was seen in 2 TOS episodes.

#10 of 151 OFFLINE   Kevin M

Kevin M

    Producer



  • 5,172 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 23 2000

Posted October 24 2002 - 09:52 AM

[quote] How about a CGI Sybok? Anything would be an improvement over Laurence Luckinbill. [quote] I rather liked Laurence Luckinbill, but the effects definitely have to be re-done for any redux to be even slightly successful.
-Kevin M.

There's a human tendency to resent anyone who disagrees with our pleasures.  The less mature interpret that as a personal attack on themselves.
- Roger Ebert
 

#11 of 151 OFFLINE   Jeremy Conrad

Jeremy Conrad

    Supporting Actor



  • 530 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 27 2000

Posted October 24 2002 - 09:54 AM

[quote] "Row, row your boat ..." [quote]

"I am preparing to roast...a marsh melon"

#12 of 151 OFFLINE   Joe McKeown

Joe McKeown

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 139 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999

Posted October 24 2002 - 10:15 AM

William Shatner's artistic vision. Mwaaaaa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! I'm sure Paramount will fund this once all the honest politicians tell them how cool it would be....
-- When someone asks you if you're a god, you say "YES"

my collection

#13 of 151 OFFLINE   Seth_S

Seth_S

    Second Unit



  • 335 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 12 2001

Posted October 24 2002 - 11:11 AM

Here's an idea: not do a SE of Trek V and skip to Trek IV.

#14 of 151 OFFLINE   Dave Mack

Dave Mack

    Producer



  • 4,665 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 28 2002

Posted October 24 2002 - 11:13 AM

Hey, they spent the dough to redo TMP: and I believe that Shatner has made Paramount enough money over the years. At least let him try.

Posted Image

#15 of 151 OFFLINE   Ric Easton

Ric Easton

    Screenwriter



  • 2,814 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 06 2001

Posted October 24 2002 - 11:43 AM

As much as I would want ST:V to be a good film, I'm afraid that I'm in agreement with some of the rest of you. It's just not possible. There are too many cringe inducing moments. Row your Boat Uhura stripping Chekov and Sulu lost in the woods Scotty bumps his head Too many decks...Same numbers go by... Numbers run the wrong way... Top deck (the Bridge) should be deck 1... But they went one deck above that! Yeah, what's with getting to the center of the Galazy so quickly? Voyager sure could have used their warp drive. Go climb a rock T shirt. Harve Bennet saying "We need Jim Kirk!" and Shatner's humble "Aw go on.." response. The fact that Spock had a brother at all. You would think after knowing the character for 25 years... we would have heard about this. And on and on and on... I think the least offensive thing in the whole movie were the sub-par special effects... And that's probably the only thing they could fix. Ric

#16 of 151 OFFLINE   Steve Christou

Steve Christou

    Long Member



  • 14,644 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 25 2000
  • Real Name:Steve Christou
  • LocationLondon, England

Posted October 24 2002 - 11:59 AM

I say don't touch it, Trek V makes the other Treks seem twice as good, every franchise has a duff title, its meant to be, such as Batman & Robin or Alien3, you know.. titles that make us spit when mentioned, actually Trek V wasn't THAT bad, it had its moments, Kirk questioning 'God' was spot on, and Jerry Goldsmith's music was typically superb.

Dave hören... auf, wille stoppen sie Dave... stoppen sie Dave... Mein gehirn geht... Ich bin gefühl es... Ich bin gefühl es... Ich bin ängstlich Dave... Guter Nachmittag. Ich bin ein HAL 9000 computer. Ich wurde funktionsfähig am HAL-Betrieb in Urbana, Illinois auf January 12 1992.


My DVD and Blu-ray Blog


#17 of 151 OFFLINE   RobertCharlotte

RobertCharlotte

    Supporting Actor



  • 661 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 21 2002

Posted October 24 2002 - 12:37 PM

I agree with Steve. Spend some money, do some great storyboards and use seamless branching to let Shatner show us what his vision was (hey, I kept a straight face). But there's just no point in putting makeup on this sow. Star Trek V: The Contractual Obligation is a movie best forgotten about.
Blücher!

#18 of 151 OFFLINE   DeanR

DeanR

    Second Unit



  • 312 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 2002
  • Real Name:Dean

Posted October 24 2002 - 02:44 PM

This movie was a turd of the highest degree. I would give it another shot if Shatner were allowed to revisit it. Shatner has earned the right to be given some of Paramounts money to create a director's edition. If not just skip the movie and go on to ST6-SE.

#19 of 151 OFFLINE   Steve_Tk

Steve_Tk

    Screenwriter



  • 2,833 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 30 2002

Posted October 24 2002 - 02:59 PM

is V the Undiscovered Country, that one was pretty good, or the one with the whales?

#20 of 151 OFFLINE   Andrew Walsh

Andrew Walsh

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 95 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2001

Posted October 24 2002 - 03:10 PM

IV - The Voyage Home, is the one with the whales. V - The Final Frontier is the one Shatner directed, with the central plot being about finding God. *cough* VI - The Undiscovered Country is about negotiating a peace treaty with the Klingons, and is the second best of the series. I think we all know which one is the best.
"I'd trade it all for a little more." - C. Montgomery Burns




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users