-

Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo

Firefly Episode 2: NO WIDESCREEN!


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
44 replies to this topic

#1 of 45 Jeff Kleist

Jeff Kleist

    Executive Producer

  • 11,286 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 04 1999

Posted September 27 2002 - 12:50 PM

Please call your Fox affiliate to complain, and show them that we want it wide! The first episode was widescreen, I thought that battle was solved already, obviously I was wrong

#2 of 45 Adam Lenhardt

Adam Lenhardt

    Executive Producer

  • 14,087 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 16 2001
  • LocationAlbany, NY

Posted September 27 2002 - 02:14 PM

They probably blamed the widescreen format for the low ratings.Posted Image

#3 of 45 Robert Ringwald

Robert Ringwald

    Screenwriter

  • 2,641 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001

Posted September 27 2002 - 02:42 PM

Of course, it wasn't their crappy ass marketing that did that... it was the widescreen presentation.

My brother doesn't care about widescreen, even he watched it, and actually thought it was okay (he hates Buffy. Posted Image)

I'm angry.

#4 of 45 Robert Ringwald

Robert Ringwald

    Screenwriter

  • 2,641 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001

Posted September 27 2002 - 03:23 PM

1.01 - The Train Job
*** (****)

1.02 - Bushwacked
*** (****)

Oh my, was this a good episode. I actually found this one to be a tad better than THE TRAIN JOB, as it didn't have to double as a "pilot" as well as a stand-alone episode. It was fast pased, the jokes hit the mark, and the suspense was good enough. I'll be tuning in next week, can't wait for it. I have a feeling that the ratings are going to continue how they have. The lack of widescreen annoyed me a lot. Sadly, if it helps the ratings, I actually don't care, just because I figure if the show is successful, we'll probably get a DVD release, and that'll hopefully be in widescreen. But FOX really should change it back, it makes the show much more cinematic.

#5 of 45 Jeff Kleist

Jeff Kleist

    Executive Producer

  • 11,286 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 04 1999

Posted September 27 2002 - 04:05 PM

I did very much enjoy this ep

Actually, Firefly kicked ass last week inthe ratings in Fox's book. They were VERY pleased. Friday night ratings are always going to be low

#6 of 45 Mark Turetsky

Mark Turetsky

    Supporting Actor

  • 832 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 07 1998

Posted September 27 2002 - 04:29 PM

I was glad to see a more direct contact with Reavers after being teased in Serenity with tales of how they "rape you to death, eat your flesh, and sew your skins into their clothing," for those of you who weren't fortunate enough to have seen the first pilot. Looks like they're doing a slow reveal of them, much like they did with the mayor in seasons 2 and 3 of Buffy. That one survivor at the end of the episode who had cut himself looked so freaky, I can't wait to see what the Reavers themselves will look like. I'm very pleased with this series so far.

#7 of 45 DaveF

DaveF

    Executive Producer

  • 13,352 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 04 2001
  • Real Name:David Fischer
  • LocationOne Loudoun, Ashburn, VA

Posted September 27 2002 - 05:19 PM

Quote:
Please call your Fox affiliate to complain, and show them that we want it wide!
Why? Is it supposed to widescreen? Otherwise I'd rather see 4:3 images on my 4:3 set (since DTV is not available here).

I forgot about the show and only caught the last half of it. Still, the part I saw was better than the first episode. Hopefully this is the trend: an interesting plot development show by show.

#8 of 45 Martin Rendall

Martin Rendall

    Screenwriter

  • 1,047 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 05 2000

Posted September 27 2002 - 06:09 PM

At least they're still showing the widescreen presentation on the, er, HDTV channel. I don't care if it's not real high def - it still looks way better, and is OAR.

I liked the episode. What looked like it was going to be a very derivative sci-fi plot quickly diverged into something very unexpected. I think they were just playing with us. Posted Image

Martin.
Hopelessly out of date DVD Collection Listing

#9 of 45 Phil Florian

Phil Florian

    Screenwriter

  • 1,190 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 10 2001

Posted September 28 2002 - 12:37 AM

Martin, I agree! The previews last week looked like another typical "contagion" or "Alien" type episode but turned into something very interesting. I love some of the character development, too. Jayne is turning out to be a fave but mostly because of the way the rest of the cast treats him. "You're scaring the women" was a hoot. Some good and creepy stuff was going on with the Reaver thing. I am happy they are doing the slow intro to them.

I was upset also at the lack of widescreen. It wouldn't bother me as much if it wasn't shot in that way, but it is obvious it was when watching it cropped. I mean, 4:3 is fine when shot for it (like Buffy) but sheesh. Even "Enterprise" is still showing in widescreen. C'mon, Fox! (**note to administrators: This post was not intended to make evil towards a network company...I love Fox. Fox is good.**)

Jeff, thanks for the note about Fox being happy. We just want them to be happy with the show so it stays on for a while. I always wonder how numbers relate to happiness. Like Buffy, it's numbers are lower than most shows out there yet is considered "a hit" because of the time it is on and the group it targets. Very odd.

Thanks!

Phil

#10 of 45 CaptDS9E

CaptDS9E

    Screenwriter

  • 2,171 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 18 1999

Posted September 28 2002 - 12:49 AM

I had read before hand it wasnt going to be widescreen so i was ready for it. Ill tell ya fox really has a good 1-2 punch on Friday nights. Firefly and John Doe both are excellent shows i am now hooked on. Cant wait till next weeks episodes

capt

#11 of 45 Mike Monti

Mike Monti

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 62 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 2001

Posted September 28 2002 - 01:40 AM

You think the loss of widescreen is bad, check out the last five minutes again. There's sound for the ships in space in the preview for next weeks episode.

Here's hoping it was just put in for the ad and won't really be there. Sadly, I can imagine some network tool(soon to be patented as SMT, because of it's disturbing usefulness in conversations such as this one)saying, "What's the point of having explosions if our viewers can't hear them?"

#12 of 45 Mark Turetsky

Mark Turetsky

    Supporting Actor

  • 832 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 07 1998

Posted September 28 2002 - 01:48 AM

I like how the thread title implies that the name of the episode is "No Widescreen." I mean, with an episode titled like that, you'd think Whedon and Greenwalt wanted it in P&S. Posted Image

#13 of 45 Jeff Kleist

Jeff Kleist

    Executive Producer

  • 11,286 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 04 1999

Posted September 28 2002 - 02:01 AM

Funny Mark Posted Image

The pilot was widescreen, no reason to change! They're obviously framing for 16:9 as well, given how cramped last night's ep was.

In any case, call your local Fox affiliate and complain on Monday please. There are people all over the country planning to do this, and if the bitching is loud enough, we'll get what we want

Oh, and don't email Fox either. I'm STILL stuck on their "play fantasy football" list after I complained about Football running over and offered them my solutions to solve the problem (Tell the NFL to learn how to count to 60, put the game ina PIP window etc etc)

#14 of 45 BrianW

BrianW

    Screenwriter

  • 2,552 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 30 1999

Posted September 28 2002 - 02:24 AM

Quote:
There's sound for the ships in space in the preview for next weeks episode.
I thought I was the only one to notice that there's no sound in space in this show. (I haven't read the other thread completely, so if anyone else mentioned it, I wouldn't have seen it there.) This aspect of the show is very cool. I also think it's interesting how the outer space POV shots look like they're being viewed through a joystick-controlled security camera with constant pan and zoom speeds and slow auto-focus.

This was a good episode. As for widescreen, I missed it and want it back.
-Brian
Come, Rubidia. Let's blow this epoch.

#15 of 45 Robert Ringwald

Robert Ringwald

    Screenwriter

  • 2,641 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001

Posted September 28 2002 - 07:10 AM

Last nigth scored even lower...

Firefly 1.02
3.6/7

John Doe 1.02
4.4/8

I think the prevues for John Doe look very good, and I might tune in next week, but missing the first 2 episodes might scare me into catching this one during sweeps, or summer re-runs...

I hope Fox is still pleased with the numbers, this show is growing on me.

#16 of 45 Garrett Adams

Garrett Adams

    Supporting Actor

  • 931 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 27 2000

Posted September 28 2002 - 09:14 AM

The Sacramento Fox HD feed was in 16:9. I agree with a previous poster that while not true HD it was impressive, even better than last weeks widescreen on the SD digital feed. I wasn't even aware that my Fox affiliate had upgraded to HD sometime between Firefly 1 and 2.

#17 of 45 Robert Ringwald

Robert Ringwald

    Screenwriter

  • 2,641 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001

Posted September 28 2002 - 09:49 AM

FIREFLY - SERENITY

I found this to be a much better pilot, and actually grabbed me more than the first 2 episodes aired. I'm definitely going to be tuning in againg and again.

The characters all had more time to shine, and the tone was right on the mark. FOX better not cancel this show, it's got the chance to be a cult hit.

#18 of 45 Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul

  • 37,665 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted September 28 2002 - 05:42 PM

I dunno. None of the characters really do much for me yet.

I'm so over the River chick. Can we jettison out of an airlock, please?

Am I the only one that remembers Doug Savant from his Melrose Place days?

I hate the camerawork in Firefly, sure, maybe it's intentional, but I get a bit sick from all of the "steady"cam footage. It's like watching someone play a FPS game, and those make me nauseous as well.

I'm sticking with the show for a half season, but if it doesn't get any better, I'll just be recording John Doe, a far more fast-moving show that's growing on me.
"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#19 of 45 Phil Florian

Phil Florian

    Screenwriter

  • 1,190 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 10 2001

Posted September 29 2002 - 02:35 AM

Just caught the Pilot episode "Serenity" as well. Or at least half of it. It was vastly superior to what they had to do for the "new" pilot. The relationships make a LOT more sense when the pilot is in place. I am not sure what Fox was smoking when they said it was "too slow." Sure, the pacing wasn't a Star Wars movie (wait, that's slow now too) but it was very engrossing. Moral dilemmas, close calls, guns, sex and nudity (well, she IS a prostitute) and some great dialogue. Damn...gotta wait half a year to see this? Hopefully the show will last until then. Fox, you listenting! Posted Image


Phil

#20 of 45 Joel Mack

Joel Mack

    Screenwriter

  • 2,321 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 29 1999

Posted September 29 2002 - 02:39 AM

Quote:
Am I the only one that remembers Doug Savant from his Melrose Place days?


Nope. When I saw his name in the credits, I said "Matt!" Posted Image





Forum Nav Content I Follow