T r o y
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Jun 7, 1999
- Messages
- 649
Now that we have our Grease on DVD, I'd like to know your thoughts on the video and the 5.1 audio, especially when the songs kick in.
Bring it on!
Bring it on!
but damn, the packaging SUCKS! What's the point? An amaray style would have been much better than a thin cardboard thing... icky.
Same thing that was just used on Panic Room by Columbia, and will be used by Paramount on Saturday Night Fever. I betcha this is just the tip of the iceberg. As Warner figured out long ago, cardboard is cheaper than plastic. :frowning:
Personally (though I never thought I'd say something as horrifying as this!), I prefer a snapper over these. I can't friggin' get the digipak out of the ultra-thin slipcase. Too air-tight. :rolleyes
apart from some annoying (but thankfully nowhere near constant) EEI agree; the picture quality was definitely inconsistent. Check out the "Beauty School Dropout" sequence. The video looked like it had been pieced together from multiple sources of varying quality (or possibly one source done using different methods?). I don't know; it was pretty weird, though.
Overall, I'm very happy to have the movie on DVD, but I'm more than a little perturbed at Paramount for spending a zillion dollars promoting a disc that was obviously authored years ago.
Link Removed
that was obviously authored years agoIf nothing else, though, they stuck their new logo onto the front end, right? The "stars as meteors" version for the 90th anniversary? Or am I just nuts?
(well, I'm always nuts, but I meant as pertains to THIS!)
It is definitely a rehash of the 1998 mastering efforts, both in sound and video quality. Not impressive in the least.Watching the dvd of Grease, the first thing I noticed was the new Paramount logo when the disc spins up before the main menu. Now, I don't believe the new Paramount logo is 4 years old. This indicates that the current Grease dvds are a recent pressing. Of course, it may be a 4 year-old film transfer, but methinks the compression, authoring and pressing was done in the last year or so.
While the dvd is certainly lackluster, it is still a drastic improvement over the LD (especially on a 90+ inch 16X9 screen). Furthermore, I know this film VERY well, and saw the 1998 re-release in the theater. The dvd looks better than the print I saw in the theater (which is depressing and another issue altogether).
What this film needs is a full restoration, not a special edition. Paramount should spend the next few years a la Warner Bros. and restore this gem. Keep the current dvd on the shelves to hold us over, but restore the damn thing properly.
I look forward to enjoying the current dvd for a while. I will, however, be very upset to see a SE of Grease in 2004 using the same transfer (or new transfer of the same troublesome elements).
Felix Martinez
Visit the CineFlexx
http://members.aol.com/beautymarkstudio/Home.html