Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo

What's your worst A-List Movie Anamorphic transfer?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
69 replies to this topic

#1 of 70 OFFLINE   Frank@N

Frank@N

    Screenwriter



  • 1,718 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 12 2002

Posted September 12 2002 - 10:01 AM

Since I watch movies on a 27" WEGA, it isn't often that I can 'see' a really bad transfer. Even old transfers from 1997-98 can be flattered by a smaller display. My vote goes to.....'Rob Roy'. Even on my small display, the level of video noise in this transfer is excessive. Frank

#2 of 70 OFFLINE   Josh Lowe

Josh Lowe

    Screenwriter



  • 1,063 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 19 2002

Posted September 12 2002 - 10:47 AM

Definitely Star Wars: The Phantom Menace.

#3 of 70 OFFLINE   Patrick McCart

Patrick McCart

    Lead Actor



  • 7,493 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001
  • Real Name:Patrick McCart
  • LocationAlpharetta, GA, USA

Posted September 12 2002 - 11:22 AM

Blazing Saddles. It's not bad, but it really is pixelated. I don't get why Episode 1 looks so bad to a lot of people...it looks great despite a few scenes with some ringing. The color and definition is beautiful...very film-like as well.

#4 of 70 OFFLINE   Carlo Medina

Carlo Medina

    Executive Producer



  • 10,172 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 31 1997

Posted September 12 2002 - 11:35 AM

Rob Roy is definitely bad, but for me (IMO) not an A-list title (which I take to mean a stellar movie). That award for me would go to Unforgiven.

Thankfully to be rectified in about...1.5 weeks! Posted Image

XBox Live: TheL1brarian (let's play Destiny on XB1)


#5 of 70 OFFLINE   DeepakJR

DeepakJR

    Second Unit



  • 255 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 10 2002

Posted September 12 2002 - 11:40 AM

The only wrong thing i find with TPM trasnfer that prohibits it from being "film-like" in the EE. If they were to reduce it, i know for sure it would look stellar. Im hoping its true that AOTC wont have the EE. l8rz, Deepak Jr.
Never Die!

#6 of 70 OFFLINE   Declan

Declan

    Second Unit



  • 410 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 22 2002

Posted September 12 2002 - 12:32 PM

it's surprising actually. But PM Meanace looks worse (IMHO) on R2 Pal DVD than the R1. I've found alot in the last few years that PAL is just tooooooo sharp with some titles. PM being the worst in this regard. Due to the already excessive EE (Lcasfilm/THX what were you on when you approved it)..the sharpness of the Pal picture only enhances it even more and has alot more shimmering and stairstepping than the r1. It is'nt a bad transfer. Yes alot of scenes look filmic. But for a high (very high) profile release like this one. THX and Lucas should have transfered it without enhancement at all. If people want EE then just use the sharpness level on their TV or DVD player. I hope that AOTC has eradicated these problems and Lucas and the team at THX looked at the reviews of the picture quality when it was released and did something about it. It looks impressive on a big screen. Another few that were bad anamorphic that I thought were: Die Hard with a vengence SpEd, Army Of Darkness Dir Cut (so bad this one, top of the list I think). One non-anamorphic title that should be redone has to be Born n the Fourth of July. At the start I did'nt think this could get worse looking until it went to the veitnam sequence. The soilders looked like angels walking bercause of the halo around them. thats really all I can think of at the minute. And thats a good thing as it shows that (personally) there is'nt that many as the companies are putting out top notch transfers and listening to what consumers want. But please (Lucas especially) no EE, period.
"So, Jeff Beck pops his head 'round the door, and mentions there's a little sweets shop on the edge of town. So - we go. And - it's closed"

#7 of 70 OFFLINE   Brian W.

Brian W.

    Screenwriter



  • 1,958 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 29 1999
  • Real Name:Brian
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted September 12 2002 - 12:43 PM

Without a doubt, "The Sound of Music." Grainy, horrific, edge-enhanced garbage.

#8 of 70 OFFLINE   Scott_MacD

Scott_MacD

    Supporting Actor



  • 760 posts
  • Join Date: May 13 2001

Posted September 12 2002 - 01:17 PM

Declan:

I'm surprised at your findings.. An excellent analysis of TPM's EE (including R1 and R2 findings) is to be found here. http://home.t-online....TPM/TPM_01.htm - from one of the members of this forum, kudos and credit due.

I personally sold my copy of the R1 Disc One and R2 Disc Two, since I didn't want a cut version of the documentary, and I wanted to reduce those nasty halos.

And to add to this discussion :

Die Hard with a Vengeance R1 SE - now *that's* some scary EE.. Posted Image

#9 of 70 OFFLINE   Dave H

Dave H

    Producer



  • 5,340 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2000

Posted September 12 2002 - 01:29 PM

Phantom Menace - the worst anamorphic transfer? Come on! I can't believe how critical people are of this DVD just because it's not 100% perfect. It still looks good - and there are FAR many more worse anamorphic transfers out there. Trust me.

#10 of 70 OFFLINE   Josh Lowe

Josh Lowe

    Screenwriter



  • 1,063 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 19 2002

Posted September 12 2002 - 01:46 PM

It's the worst anamorphic transfer of an "A-List" budget movie that I've seen. That's what the question was.

#11 of 70 OFFLINE   Adam_WM

Adam_WM

    Screenwriter



  • 1,626 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 25 2001

Posted September 12 2002 - 02:09 PM

Harry Potter is pretty garbage.
.

 


#12 of 70 OFFLINE   Sean Patrick

Sean Patrick

    Supporting Actor



  • 743 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 22 1999

Posted September 12 2002 - 02:11 PM

I've gotta agree about people being too hard on TPM - trust me, i was one of the ones harping on the sometimes excessive EE on this dvd (and it DOES seem to vary from scene to scene), but it's not the worst EE ever put on a dvd and the DVD still looks pretty darn good and filmlike in 90% of the dvd. i think the worst A-list 16:9 title is : Reservoir Dogs.

#13 of 70 OFFLINE   Terrell

Terrell

    Producer



  • 3,217 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 11 2001

Posted September 12 2002 - 02:47 PM

[quote] It still looks good - and there are FAR many more worse anamorphic transfers out there. [quote]
I agree. In fact, there are many A-list titles out there that have transfers far, far worse than TPM. Aside from the EE and a bit of grain in the Tatooine scenes, I think it looks pretty good. Certainly not reference, but not nearly as terrible as many think it is.

Well, you can buy it again in the box set, and see how it turns out then.

Probably worse than TPM is Tombstone. Not a terrible transfer, but not nearly as good as I'd hoped. This transfer has even worse EE than TPM, and severe grain in many scenes.

#14 of 70 OFFLINE   Brian Lawrence

Brian Lawrence

    Producer



  • 3,634 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 28 1998
  • Real Name:Brian

Posted September 12 2002 - 02:56 PM

I don't know if it's considered A-List but one of the worst is, Heathers because I fails to look as good as the older non-anamorphic transfer. It's been DVNR'd to death and robbed of much visual detail Posted Image

I agree on Rob Roy, which like many older MGM dvds looks like they just took an old LD transfer and somehow stretched the image for a pseudo anamorphic transfer. Plus it's a 140 minute film all cramped onto one layer.

#15 of 70 OFFLINE   Sean Patrick

Sean Patrick

    Supporting Actor



  • 743 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 22 1999

Posted September 12 2002 - 03:05 PM

i take back my nomination for Reservoir Dogs and replace it with HEAT. Looks like garbage most of the time on my 38" set - very noisy. One thing Reservoir Dogs isn't is unnecessarily NOISY.

#16 of 70 OFFLINE   Allan Mack

Allan Mack

    Supporting Actor



  • 622 posts
  • Join Date: May 26 2001

Posted September 12 2002 - 09:19 PM

Well, The Phantom Menace is certainly the worst A-list anamorphic transfer in my collection...

#17 of 70 OFFLINE   Gordon McMurphy

Gordon McMurphy

    Producer



  • 3,530 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 03 2002

Posted September 12 2002 - 09:34 PM

What are the transfers like on Dog Day Afternoon and Bonnie & Clyde? Gordy

#18 of 70 OFFLINE   Mitch Stevens

Mitch Stevens

    Supporting Actor



  • 581 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 27 2002

Posted September 12 2002 - 09:51 PM

I have to agree with the person who mentioned Heathers! It truely looks awful in Anamorphic! (I can't believe I just said that). Everything lacks visual detail. The picture is way too soft, and out of focus. If there was ever a title that needs to be re-done, it's this one.

#19 of 70 OFFLINE   Josh Lowe

Josh Lowe

    Screenwriter



  • 1,063 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 19 2002

Posted September 12 2002 - 11:40 PM

Heathers is not an A-List movie. It was not a major Hollywood release. Neither was Resevoir Dogs. It now receives "A-List" treatment but its original release was far from major. It was an indy production and release. Was Tombstone a big release? I had never even heard of it until I saw it on VHS, but maybe I just overlooked it.

#20 of 70 OFFLINE   Ryan Spaight

Ryan Spaight

    Supporting Actor



  • 676 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969

Posted September 13 2002 - 03:06 AM

[quote] Was Tombstone a big release? [quote]

It wanted to be.

Ryan




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users