Jump to content



Photo

Why didn't "Casino" get the recognition "Goodfellas" did?


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 of 27 Dave H

Dave H

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 5,186 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2000

Posted September 07 2002 - 07:27 PM

Okay, I admit it. Casino was basically a "Goodfellas II" in a sense. But, even so, I thought it was ALMOST as good as Goodfellas. (Goodfellas did flow a bit better and had a little better story.). I liked how Casino focused more around Deniro and Peschi. Their acting speaks for itself. And, what about Stone? That was clearly her best performance ever. Of course, there were other good performances in this movie, as well.

However, Casino seemed to be considered a failure by many and not do nearly as good as Goodfellas. It surprises me a bit.

#2 of 27 Tom-G

Tom-G

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 1,646 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 31 2000

Posted September 07 2002 - 07:42 PM

Quote:
And, what about Stone? That was clearly her best performance ever


Agreed. Martin Scorsese has a way of bringing out the best in his actors/actresses (one of the reasons I can't wait to see how DiCaprio does in Gangs of New York).

Casino is a great film, but the fact that Scorsese made the masterpiece that is GoodFellas only a few years prior, Casino suffers from a "been-there-done-that" for most people. Almost everytime I speak of Casino with someone, he or she will immediatly say "I didn't like it as much as GoodFellas."

#3 of 27 BarryS

BarryS

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 424 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 01 2002

Posted September 07 2002 - 08:57 PM

Call me crazy, but I like Casino better. Not that Casino is the better movie, it's just my favorite of the two. I think it takes what was great about Goodfellas and expands on it. Everything from the soundtrack to the acting to the dialog to the cinematography and editing is top-notch. De Niro and Pesci also get juicier roles than Goodfellas. Their characters were far more interesting than Ray Liotta's and Casino focuses on them rather than relegating them to supporting characters. I'd rather watch De Niro or Pesci than Ray Liotta any day. They achieve some of that wonderful chemistry that they had years earlier in Raging Bull.

This movie turned me on to mob movies. From it, I discovered The Godfather, not to mention the work of Martin Scorsese. Derivative it may be, but I love Casino and I'll still call it one of my favorite films.

#4 of 27 Paul_D

Paul_D

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 2,056 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 28 2001

Posted September 07 2002 - 11:24 PM

I thought what worked in Goodfellas was that the characters of both De Niro and Pesci remain mysterious throughout the film. They're unpredictable because they are supporting characters, and we don't have a running commentary of what's going on in their heads as we do with Liotta's character. Seeing them though Liotta's eyes makes them far more compelling than their respective characters in Casino, whose motivation and thought process is clear, all the time.

Personnally, I thought Casino was very labored. It dragged, and although the 'beginning...good times...bad times...end' structure was well-used before Goodfells it didn't feel anywhere near as cliched as it did in Casino.
[c][/c]
[c]"Where did you take, this girl Jerry?"[/c]

#5 of 27 Steve Christou

Steve Christou

    Long Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 14,086 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 25 2000
  • Real Name:Steve Christou
  • LocationLondon, England

Posted September 08 2002 - 12:41 AM

Stone annoyed the hell out of me in Casino, her character not the actress, I was pissed off with DeNiro's character for not dumping her, he could tell she didn't love him but still wouldn't get rid of her, horrible.

Sharon Stone was great in Casino but I much prefer her in Basic Instinct, as the ultimate femme fatale.

Goodfellas is much better than Casino IMO and prob the best film of the 1990's. Barry Levinson's Bugsy was very good too.

Dave hören... auf, wille stoppen sie Dave... stoppen sie Dave... Mein gehirn geht... Ich bin gefühl es... Ich bin gefühl es... Ich bin ängstlich Dave... Guter Nachmittag. Ich bin ein HAL 9000 computer. Ich wurde funktionsfähig am HAL-Betrieb in Urbana, Illinois auf January 12 1992.


Lord of the Hubs


#6 of 27 Al B. C

Al B. C

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 645 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 25 2002

Posted September 08 2002 - 06:14 AM

I think there is way too much voice over. Otherwise, I like this movie just fine.

#7 of 27 rhett

rhett

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 571 posts
  • Join Date: May 11 2001

Posted September 08 2002 - 08:14 AM

I don't understand why Casino isn't as highly regarded as GoodFellas either. Both are very rich in story and character development, and the editing in both films is fantastic.

Stone's performance was easily her best, and had she been pushed to supporting actress like she should have been, she would have won the Oscar for her role as well.

For me, I prefer knowing the DeNiro and Pesci characters in Casino over their mysterious backgrounds in GoodFellas. I want to watch these characters stubbornly unravel and unseat themselves from success. The personalities of DeNiro's and Pesci's characters in Casino are much more developed than their characters in GoodFellas, and there performances were that much better because of it. When I watched GoodFellas I was frustrated at how underdeveloped DeNiro's character was, it felt more like a glorified cameo.

Overall, it is tough to pick one film over the other, but overall I think I'd go with Casino, because the characters, to me, were more developed and intruiging than those in GoodFellas.
"The Night HE Came Home"

#8 of 27 Steve Russell

Steve Russell

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 132 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 10 1999

Posted September 08 2002 - 12:12 PM

There was a series on the history channel recently about true mob stories that were made into films. They discussed both Casino and Goodfellas. They interviewed both Henry Hill from Goodfellas and the guy that Deniro played in Casino(can't remember his real name). Apparently aside from the usual hollywood dramatizations here and there for a more interesting story they were both amazingly close to their real world counterparts.

#9 of 27 Dick

Dick

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 3,722 posts
  • Join Date: May 22 1999
  • Real Name:Rick

Posted September 08 2002 - 04:07 PM

I loved the opening twenty minutes of CASINO, with its insights into the actual process of gambling, collecting and sorting money. After that, Sharon Stone was certainly impressive. I enjoyed seeing John Bloom (Joe Bob Briggs) and Don Rickles in dramatic roles. But, hey, a little Joe Pesci - fine actor though he is - goes a long way after seeing him in essentially the same role in GOODFELLAS. This is all so subjective because we all have opposing opinions, but for me, GOODFELLAS is the quintessential mob film of all time, while CASINO is a wannabe following too closely on the heels of its predecessor.

#10 of 27 Scott Weinberg

Scott Weinberg

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 7,482 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 03 2000

Posted September 08 2002 - 06:25 PM

Simple answer?

Because Casino came second.

Maybe I'm full of beans here, but maybe it's seen by some as 'sticking with a good thing'. (Scorsese, De Niro, Pesci, Mafia Stuff)

Me? I think both movies are excellent, and only one of 'em has Jimmy Woods in it! Posted Image

#11 of 27 Inspector Hammer!

Inspector Hammer!

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 11,067 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 15 1999
  • Real Name:John Williamson
  • LocationWilmington, Delaware

Posted September 08 2002 - 06:53 PM

I think you nailed it Scott, Casino was just following in the very impressive footsteps of Goodfellas and it robbed it of the originality that it otherwise would have had.

That said though, I really liked Casino, I had the LD but havn't gotten the dvd yet. I sorta had a problem with Joe Pesci in this one though, not a big one, just a little. In that scene at the bar where he stabs the guy with the pen near the beginning of the movie, I thought to myself "O.k., he's trying TOO hard to pull off another Tommy Devito here." He improved though as the film went on.
"That's Jack Bauer!!!!!! He's coming for me!!!!!" - Charles Logan

#12 of 27 Ryan Peter

Ryan Peter

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 1,221 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 15 1999

Posted September 08 2002 - 07:25 PM

The character Pesci plays in Casino is what the character he played in Goodfellas dreamed of being. He has a made man and could do whatever he wanted.
"I don't remember much..... Uhhhh...."

#13 of 27 Eric Bass

Eric Bass

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 308 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 13 2000

Posted September 09 2002 - 02:42 AM

For me I think Goodfellas has the more compelling story. Casino is the story of these high up mobsters running casinos or thug rings. By contrast Goodfellas is primarily the story of an ordinary guy turned mobster, relatively low level, dealing with 'the life' and a family at the same time. Easier to identify with than the characters in Casino who have more in common with rich business owners than myself.

#14 of 27 Shawn C

Shawn C

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 1,434 posts
  • Join Date: May 15 2001

Posted September 09 2002 - 05:01 PM

Quote:
Stone annoyed the hell out of me in Casino, her character not the actress, I was pissed off with DeNiro's character for not dumping her, he could tell she didn't love him but still wouldn't get rid of her, horrible.


Yep, but I think that is exactly how Scorcese WANTED you to feel about those characters. It's good that you got annoyed.

#15 of 27 Steve Christou

Steve Christou

    Long Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 14,086 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 25 2000
  • Real Name:Steve Christou
  • LocationLondon, England

Posted September 10 2002 - 05:08 AM

Quote:
Yep, but I think that is exactly how Scorcese WANTED you to feel about those characters. It's good that you got annoyed.


Hey it wasn't good that I got annoyed, damn that Scorsese, and I was in such a good mood before the film started, I was biting my fist all the way thru the film, I had to watch Scarface afterwards just to recover...

"Why don't joo try stickin' jo head up jour ass -- see if it fits"
"Manolo, shoot dat pis o' chit"


aaah what a flick..Posted Image

ps. Hey whats keeping that Scarface Appreciation Thread?

Dave hören... auf, wille stoppen sie Dave... stoppen sie Dave... Mein gehirn geht... Ich bin gefühl es... Ich bin gefühl es... Ich bin ängstlich Dave... Guter Nachmittag. Ich bin ein HAL 9000 computer. Ich wurde funktionsfähig am HAL-Betrieb in Urbana, Illinois auf January 12 1992.


Lord of the Hubs


#16 of 27 Travis D

Travis D

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 370 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 15 2001

Posted September 10 2002 - 03:11 PM

The "because it came second" answer is the best and truest of all the speculation here. First of all, I saw Casino first since I'm only 17 and enjoyed it exhuberantly. I then rented Goodfellas, and you know what, I found Casino to be the better film. Whatever Goodfellas did, it seemed that Casino did it better. Goodfellas may have had the advantage of being released first, but if you take that variable out, like in my situation, you'll see that Casino built upon what was given in Goodfellas to create something more well-rounded and complete. Not to mention simply awe-inspiring performances from DeNiro, Pesci, and Stone. This movie is what got me to love DeNiro. Just love him.

Of course this is all my opinion, take that as you will.
*Child holds up Fullscreen version*
Child : Lord of the Rings, Lord of the Rings! Daddy, what does it say at the top? I can't read it.
Father : There are few who can. The language is that of Mordor, which I shall not utter here.
Child : Mordor?
Father : In the common tongue, it reads, 'One...

#17 of 27 Dean Kousoulas

Dean Kousoulas

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 332 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 15 2002

Posted September 10 2002 - 03:34 PM

As you can tell, Casino is my favorite movie of all time. Robert Denro, Joe Pesci, Sharon Stone...such great performances by all three. Every time I watch the film, I love it a little more then I did the last time I viewed it.

As for many people calling it a "Goodfellas 2", I never compare 2 movies unless the latter is a sequel. Goodfellas is a great, great film, but I simply think Casino is better.

Dean
"Earnest Hemingway once wrote 'The world is a fine place, and worth fighting for.' I agree with the 2nd part." - Morgan Freeman, Se7en

My DVD Collection

#18 of 27 Rob Tomlin

Rob Tomlin

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 4,507 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 08 2000

Posted September 10 2002 - 04:16 PM

Casino is certainly a fine film. As a very big Scorsese fan, however, I definitely agree with the "been there, done that" statements as to why this film was not received better than it was.

That being said, I still think that Goodfellas is the better movie, and I am 98% sure that I would feel that way even if Casino had come first.

How is that for inconsistent reasoning? Posted Image

For ordinary men, it's a burning, fiery furnace.

#19 of 27 Mike Broadman

Mike Broadman

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 4,956 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 24 2001

Posted September 11 2002 - 01:38 AM

The problem with a director like Scorsese is that his work is so great and unique that people always expect him to one-up himself and constantly do something brilliant and original all the time. IMO, that is unfair. Not everything has to be so radically different.

How many Hitchcock films are similar to each other? Who cares?

Scorsese already has enough varied work to be considered a master: Kundun, Age of Innocence, King of Comedy, and all the gangster movies. It just so happens that his specialty is the gangster stuff. And, yeah, two of them have the Deniro / Pesci stuff. But to me, Casino and Goodfellas are different enough to be looked at seperately, especially with the added dynamic of Sharon Stone.

Goodfellas has a special place in my heart as one of my top (whatever number) movies, but Casino is great, too.

#20 of 27 AndyW

AndyW

    Advanced Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 36 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 27 2001

Posted September 12 2002 - 10:04 AM

I love both films.
Bobby Boucher:I like college and I like football and I'm gonna keep doin' 'em both cause they make me happy! [Slams door,then comes back.] And you're wrong, Mama! Alligators are ornery because of their medulla oblongata! [Slams door,then comes back.] And I like Vickie Vallencourt and she...




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Forum Nav Content I Follow