Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

The Hobbit (merged thread)


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
1638 replies to this topic

#1621 of 1639 ONLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul



  • 22,318 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted September 05 2013 - 03:59 AM

That's nice, but it says nothing about how audiences in general reacted.

I hated the 48 fps because it made the movie look like a video game cut scene (especially the shots that were all CG) but when I was leaving the theater I heard a couple of guys saying how much they "liked the new movie process that they used". Obviously, that's not a scientific sampling but even online, I've seen far more positive reaction than negative. I'm sure that 48 fps will eventually become the standard so my hope is that Jim Cameron figures out how to do it right and not have everything appear as a PlayStation 4 game.


  • SamT likes this

#1622 of 1639 OFFLINE   Carlo Medina

Carlo Medina

    Lead Actor



  • 9,753 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 31 1997

Posted September 05 2013 - 06:18 AM

I think one of the things that contributes to the "video game cut scene" feel (which I totally agree with) is that 48fps adds a hyper-real look to things. 24fps can sort of mask things, making CGI blend more seamlessly into real footage. I think 48fps tends to reveal CGI for what it is more than 24fps. And Hobbit being very CGI heavy (and I'm going to guess Avatar 2-3 will as well) that explains the video game look that it was given.

 

At home, when I enable my LED TV's 120hz capability (which I normally keep off) yes it makes the live-action footage of a baseball game, TV show, etc. look hyper-real (for lack of a better word) but it doesn't look as video game like as The Hobbit did in theaters.

 

Perhaps if more films that are less reliant on CGI are shot in 48fps it will ease the visual transition of moviegoers into the format?


XBox Live: TheL1brarian (let's play Destiny on XB1)


#1623 of 1639 OFFLINE   Emanuel1

Emanuel1

    Agent



  • 34 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 21 2013
  • Real Name:Dessel Martro

Posted September 13 2013 - 04:43 AM

In The Hobbit, why do you think Bilbo was chosen to go with the dwarves to recover the treasure?



#1624 of 1639 OFFLINE   Neil Middlemiss

Neil Middlemiss

    Screenwriter



  • 2,770 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2001
  • Real Name:Neil Middlemiss

Posted September 13 2013 - 05:12 AM

In The Hobbit, why do you think Bilbo was chosen to go with the dwarves to recover the treasure?


It seems like you have a school or college assignment (given this question and the other a page or two back) based in the book and are looking for help in this thread, right?
  • cafink likes this
"Equipped with his five senses, man explores the universe around him and calls the adventure Science" – Edwin Hubble
My DVD Collection

#1625 of 1639 OFFLINE   Aaron Silverman

Aaron Silverman

    Lead Actor



  • 9,575 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 22 1999
  • Real Name:Aaron Silverman
  • LocationFlorida

Posted September 13 2013 - 10:35 AM

Because the Oracle prophesied that Morpheus would find him.


"How wonderful it will be to have a leader unburdened by the twin horrors of knowledge and experience." -- Mr. Wick

#1626 of 1639 OFFLINE   Mike Frezon

Mike Frezon

    Studio Mogul



  • 30,189 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 09 2001
  • LocationRensselaer, NY

Posted September 13 2013 - 11:31 AM

*
POPULAR

In The Hobbit, why do you think Bilbo was chosen to go with the dwarves to recover the treasure?

 

Maybe because he was the greatest little hobbit of them all.

 


  • Sean Bryan, Tino, Radioman970 and 1 other like this

There's Jessie the yodeling cowgirl. Bullseye, he's Woody's horse. Pete the old prospector. And, Woody, the man himself.Of course, it's time for Woody's RoundUp. He's the very best! He's the rootinest, tootinest cowboy in the wild, wild west!


HTF Rules | HTF Mission Statement | Father of the Bride

Dieting with my Dog & Heart to Heart/Hand in Paw by Peggy Frezon


#1627 of 1639 OFFLINE   Sean Bryan

Sean Bryan

    Sean Bryan



  • 2,732 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969
  • Real Name:Sean

Posted September 22 2013 - 08:38 AM

Happy Birthday, Bilbo and Frodo!
I don't believe in transcending the genre, I believe IN the genre - Joss Whedon

#1628 of 1639 OFFLINE   DavidJ

DavidJ

    Screenwriter



  • 2,612 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 23 2001
  • Real Name:David

Posted October 04 2013 - 09:30 PM

We saw the 3D trailer before Gravity last night and I'm hopeful that it will be good. They seem to be going a little overboard with the 3D and I did notice that 3D wasn't quite as effective as it was at 48fps. Even so, I preferred the first one in non-HFR. Our visual systems expect motion blur-it's there in real life too-and when it's minimized too much it looks artificial.

#1629 of 1639 OFFLINE   Wayne_j

Wayne_j

    Supporting Actor



  • 635 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 07 2006
  • Real Name:Wayne

Posted October 23 2013 - 08:21 PM

The extended cut is now out on iTunes.



#1630 of 1639 OFFLINE   SamT

SamT

    Supporting Actor



  • 823 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 21 2010
  • Real Name:Sam

Posted November 01 2013 - 11:38 AM

Any detailed list of the changes?


Here since 1999!

trakt is a fun way to see what we watch and rate. Add me if you are in this thread!

 
 

 

 


#1631 of 1639 OFFLINE   Wayne_j

Wayne_j

    Supporting Actor



  • 635 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 07 2006
  • Real Name:Wayne

Posted November 01 2013 - 06:16 PM

Here is a page with a detailed list of changes.

 

http://www.theonerin...on-scene-guide/

 

The bonus features are worth the price of the download/Blu-ray itself.



#1632 of 1639 OFFLINE   SamT

SamT

    Supporting Actor



  • 823 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 21 2010
  • Real Name:Sam

Posted November 02 2013 - 10:53 AM

Thanks. The beginning of the movie was perfect by not showing Smaug. They shouldn't add more of him especially a shot showing his full body.

 

image3-300x195.jpg


Edited by SamT, November 02 2013 - 10:54 AM.

Here since 1999!

trakt is a fun way to see what we watch and rate. Add me if you are in this thread!

 
 

 

 


#1633 of 1639 OFFLINE   Brandon Conway

Brandon Conway

    captveg



  • 7,305 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 30 2002
  • Real Name:Brandon Conway
  • LocationNorth Hollywood, CA

Posted November 06 2013 - 09:37 PM

EXTENDED EDITION - The 13 additional minutes are there for serious fans only and simply allow for more experiences on this visit to Middle-Earth. I suspect anyone with misgivings about Jackson's indulgences of the like in the theatrical cut will continue to have them here. As for me, this still remains a wondrous picture. 10/10

"And now the reprimand, from an American critic. He reproaches me for using film as a sacred & lasting medium, like a painting or a book. He does not believe that filmmaking is an inferior art, but he believes, and quite rightly, that a reel goes quickly, that the public are looking above all for relaxation, that film is fragile and that it is pretentious to express the power of one's soul by such ephemeral and delicate means, that Charlie Chaplin's or Buster Keaton's first films can only be seen on very rare and badly spoiled prints. I add that the cinema is making daily progress and that eventually films that we consider marvelous today will soon be forgotten because of new dimensions & colour. This is true. But for 4 weeks this film [The Blood of a Poet] has been shown to audiences that have been so attentive, so eager & so warm, that I wonder after all there is not an anonymous public who are looking for more than relaxation in the cinema." - Jean Cocteau, 1932


#1634 of 1639 OFFLINE   Virgoan

Virgoan

    Second Unit



  • 321 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 14 2007
  • Real Name:Ron Pulliam
  • LocationOakland CA

Posted November 07 2013 - 03:44 PM

As was true of all the extended cuts of the LOTR trilogy, the extended edition of "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" is more satisfying than the theatrical cut.  The scenes added actually "add" relevant information and atmosphere to the film.


  • SamT likes this

#1635 of 1639 OFFLINE   Virgoan

Virgoan

    Second Unit



  • 321 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 14 2007
  • Real Name:Ron Pulliam
  • LocationOakland CA

Posted November 07 2013 - 03:46 PM

In The Hobbit, why do you think Bilbo was chosen to go with the dwarves to recover the treasure?

Gandalf answered that question when Lady Galadriel asked why the halfling was part of the company.  Gandalf explained that Saruman believes that evil can be fought by powerful people (wizards, elves and men).  But Gandalf confesses he has always felt it is the gentle folk in the world who can endure and stave off evil by the simple process of love.  Hobbits love simple things and they are extremely devoted to their companions.



#1636 of 1639 OFFLINE   SamT

SamT

    Supporting Actor



  • 823 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 21 2010
  • Real Name:Sam

Posted November 10 2013 - 05:45 AM

As was true of all the extended cuts of the LOTR trilogy, the extended edition of "The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey" is more satisfying than the theatrical cut.  The scenes added actually "add" relevant information and atmosphere to the film.

 

Not seen it yet but I can believe that. I remember FOTR EE actually felt shorter to me and the original cut felt too long.


Here since 1999!

trakt is a fun way to see what we watch and rate. Add me if you are in this thread!

 
 

 

 


#1637 of 1639 OFFLINE   Jeff Cooper

Jeff Cooper

    Screenwriter



  • 1,268 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2000

Posted November 10 2013 - 08:37 AM

Thanks. The beginning of the movie was perfect by not showing Smaug. They shouldn't add more of him especially a shot showing his full body.

 

image3-300x195.jpg

 

I just watched the EE last night.  This shot you mention lasts less than a second, and you can only see the full body really by freeze framing as the screenshot above is.

 

Seems like the most minor of nitpicks to point out.


-Jeff Cooper

"Curse you inspector Dim! You are too clever for us naughty people."

#1638 of 1639 OFFLINE   Sean Bryan

Sean Bryan

    Sean Bryan



  • 2,732 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969
  • Real Name:Sean

Posted December 07 2013 - 03:16 PM

I'm happy to hear that The Desolation of Smaug seems to be getting lots of good reviews.

Here's a very positive sampling (all spoiler free)

http://www.comicbook...s/news/?a=91155

While An Unexpected Journey had plenty of bucolic charm, it did, for a Middle-earth film, feel oddly inconsequential. The Desolation Of Smaug remedies that. Moody, urgent and, for want of a better word, Ringsier, it’s a much more satisfying film. If anything, it dispenses with early events with something approaching impatience: Beorn (Mikael Persbrandt), the aforementioned bear-man, is left behind before we’ve really had a chance to savour his peculiar brand of beastly intensity (though no doubt he’ll be back to claw up baddies in the Battle Of Five Armies), and the same goes for Mirkwood’s hallucinatory boughs, which have the company tripping balls in a variety of amusing ways. Middle-earth's got its mojo back. A huge improvement on the previous instalment, this takes our adventurers into uncharted territory and delivers spectacle by the ton. And in case you were wondering, yes, someone manages to say the title as dialogue.


SOURCE: Empire

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is a rollicking piece of epic entertainment, superior to its predecessor technically and dramatically. It atones for the rather lackluster first film, and generates excitement for next year's concluding chapter of the trilogy, The Hobbit: There And Back Again. If you were disappointed with The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey then The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is the film you've been waiting for. It's a breathlessly told, action-packed crowd-pleaser that restores the luster of the saga for those underwhelmed by its predecessor and leaves you excited for the final chapter in the trilogy.


SOURCE: IGN

The Desolation of Smaug is a cheerfully entertaining and exhilarating adventure tale, a supercharged Saturday morning picture: it's mysterious and strange and yet Jackson also effortlessly conjures up that genial quality that distinguishes The Hobbit from the more solemn Rings stories. The absurdity is winning: you're laughing with, not laughing at. For me, it never sagged once in its mighty two hour 40 minutes running time and the high-frame-rate projection for this film somehow looks richer and denser than it did the last time around. Maybe I'm just getting used to it. Jackson has shown that he is an expert in big-league popular movie-making to rival Lucas and Spielberg. His Smaug, with its fight scenes, chase spectaculars, creepy creatures and secret stone doors opening with a grinding noise, is something to set alongside the Indiana Jones films.


SOURCE: The Guardian


Nearly everything about "The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug" represents an improvement over the first installment of Peter Jackson's three-part adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien's beloved creation. Beginning with the blessing of not being stuck with a bunch of hungry and thirsty dwarves in Bilbo Baggins' hut for a half-hour at the outset, nearly everything about The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug represents an improvement over the first installment of Peter Jackson's three-part adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkien's beloved creation. The “unexpected journey” launched in last Christmas' box-office behemoth becomes the heart of the matter this time around, making for plenty of peril, warfare, theme-park-ride-style escapes and little-guy courage. For Jackson and Warner Bros., it's another movie, another billion.


SOURCE: The Hollywood Reporter

The tone is one hundred percent Jackson – a kind of thundering gloominess, cut with the occasional glint of Discworld mischief. Jackson and his co-writers, Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens, have decapitated bodies twitching on the ground, and a captured dwarf leering at a female elf: “Aren’t you going to search me? I could have anything down my trousers.” Maybe this really is what a lot of people want to see from a film version of The Hobbit, but let’s at least accept that Tolkien would probably not have been among them.


SOURCE: The Telegraph

Clearer and more engaging than its predecessor, this second installation in the “Hobbit” trilogy deftly brings out the human side of dwarves and elves while upping the action quotient. If “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey” was a single-serving tribute to the fans of the J.R.R. Tolkien book that inspired it, its follow up, “The Desolation of Smaug,” offers a nod to the uninitiated moviegoing audiences that made a prequel trilogy possible. Eschewing the kitchen-sink THE HOBBIT: THE DESOLATION OF SMAUGminutiae of the first installment (or maybe just having used all of it up) Peter Jackson creates a rousing, immersive sequel that offers the same sort of sweeping action — and more crucially, emotional engagement — that helped the “Rings” films become a cultural phenomenon, regardless whether or not you were familiar with the source material.


SOURCE: The Wrap

Fans of the book will be awaiting several key episodes that serve as highlights: a brief stop-off for breakfast with skin-changing bear-man Beorn, a run-in with the spiders of Mirkwood, the rollercoaster barrel escape (which was originally intended to close the first act). Jackson’s eye for inventive action is undiminished, and when he gets a set-piece in full flow, there are few who can match him for breathless originality. Despite suffering from middle-act wobbles, The Desolation Of Smaug nevertheless delivers rousing action, incredible visuals and one stupendous dragon.


SOURCE: Total Film

If “An Unexpected Journey” felt like nearly three hours’ worth of throat clearing and beard stroking, the saga gets fully under way at last in “The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug,” the similarly massive but far more purposeful second chapter in Peter Jackson’s latest Tolkien enterprise. Actually shorter than the first film by nine minutes, this robust, action-packed adventure benefits from a headier sense of forward momentum and a steady stream of 3D-enhanced thrills — culminating in a lengthy confrontation with a fire-breathing, scenery-chewing dragon — even as our heroes’ quest splits into three strands that are left dangling in classic middle-film fashion. Jackson’s gargantuan undertaking can still feel like completist overkill at times, but that won’t keep the Middle-earth enthusiasts who pushed the first “Hobbit” film past the $1 billion mark worldwide from doing the same with this Dec. 13 release, which should see Warners’ and MGM’s coffers overflow like

Edited by Sean Bryan, December 07 2013 - 03:17 PM.

I don't believe in transcending the genre, I believe IN the genre - Joss Whedon

#1639 of 1639 OFFLINE   Emanuel1

Emanuel1

    Agent



  • 34 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 21 2013
  • Real Name:Dessel Martro

Posted January 13 2014 - 04:13 AM

What are references mentioned in the first Lord of the Ring from The Hobbit book?






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users