Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

Progressive scanning and PAL

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 of 13 OFFLINE   Chris Valder

Chris Valder


  • 6 posts
  • Join Date: May 28 2002

Posted May 28 2002 - 10:39 AM

I am new to this game, but want to buy a DVD player for my projector in the UK. Progressive scanning DVD players seem to offer the best picture. At present is this technology applicable only to NTSC or do PAL videos offer the same facility?
Cheers ChrisPosted Image

#2 of 13 OFFLINE   Allan Jayne

Allan Jayne


  • 2,406 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 01 1998

Posted May 29 2002 - 12:53 AM

Progressive scan technology (and all of the problems in de-interlacing) apply equally to PAL as to NTSC. I am told, unfortunately, that the selection of PAL equipment is much more limited at this time.

The iScan Pro de-interlaces both PAL (to 576p) and NTSC (to 480p).

Video hints:

#3 of 13 OFFLINE   Jonathan Kaye

Jonathan Kaye

    Second Unit

  • 399 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 19 2000

Posted May 29 2002 - 04:37 AM

For a start, you need to check if your projector is capable of accepting a progressively scanned picture in both PAL & NTSC, otherwise you can forget it.

PAL Progressive Scan output is yet to be ratified due to copy protection issues, and won't be for the time being. There are several Progressive Scan players that can have their PAL progressive scan 'turned on' (such as recent players from Denon & Arcam) in much the same way as multi-region handset hacks.

The best solution I've come across is TAG McLaren's DVD32R player, which has a Progressive Scan upgrade that can quite legally do PAL as well (as it is a seperate video processor, albeit within the DVD player's casing). It's based on an updated version of the processor in the iScan Pro, and has the added benefit of being to progressively scan video signals in (ie from satellite, VCR, etc). The downside is that the player & upgrade costs about GBP5400 in total!
"There's no point in being grown-up if you can't be childish sometimes" - The Doctor.

#4 of 13 OFFLINE   Chris Valder

Chris Valder


  • 6 posts
  • Join Date: May 28 2002

Posted June 03 2002 - 08:37 AM

Thanks good people.
I have a Sony VPL VW10HT projector which I believe is Ok for these signals.
I have read good reports of the Denon 2800. I believe it is multiregion and will do progressive scanning on both NTSC and PAL.
What do you think? Also what other competition is there at about £750?
Cheers Chris (Bishops Stortford, Herts)

#5 of 13 OFFLINE   Ian Montgomerie

Ian Montgomerie

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 112 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 02 2002

Posted June 03 2002 - 12:57 PM

Actually, PAL progressive is harder than NTSC progressive for most chips. Sage's motion-adaptive chips have no problem. However, other chips are mostly based on "cadence detection" to differentiate film vs. video. This is looking for the 3/2 cadence found in 24fps film converted to 60fps NTSC. PAL however has a 2/2 cadence, so PAL progressive is inherently annoying for many chipsets to support. At least, without having a manual video/film switch for the user.

#6 of 13 OFFLINE   Don Munsil

Don Munsil

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 102 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 27 2000

Posted June 03 2002 - 01:11 PM

I also have a Sony VW10HT, and I wouldn't recommend the Denon 2800, as it has a pretty visible chroma bug. Since the 10HT can natively handle NTSC and PAL with no problem, you just need a player than can output PAL as PAL and NTSC as NTSC; you don't need transcoding. Given that, your options are considerable. If you can get your hands on a Skyworth or Nintaus player, they are region-free and have good PAL and NTSC progressive output. They are chinese and quirky. There's a thread on them here: nintaus/skyworth thread

You may be able to find a hacked Panasonic RP-56 (or whatever the British equivalent is), which would also be a good choice.

My understanding is that the Philips Q50 (US) can be easily hacked to produce PAL-progressive output, and that's a very nice player.

What I'm running right now is a hacked player that was originally a Panasonic A110 with a progressive board added to it, and it works like a champ for both PAL and NTSC. Sadly, that's hardly an "off the shelf" solution.

You may just want to check with the usual multi-region folks in the UK and tell them that you want a progressive player that can output PAL as PAL and NTSC as NTSC. That's generally an easier bill to fill than one that transcodes. Also, if you do get one that transcodes, make sure that it also will output PAL and NTSC unchanged, as it will look better if it's never transcoded and the projector gets the original format.

Hope this helps,

#7 of 13 OFFLINE   Don Munsil

Don Munsil

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 102 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 27 2000

Posted June 03 2002 - 01:19 PM

Here's another thread, about how to enable PAL progressive on the NTSC Philips Q50:

Philips Q50 PAL hack

Hope that helps.

#8 of 13 OFFLINE   Eujin


    Supporting Actor

  • 551 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 19 2001

Posted June 04 2002 - 05:29 AM

The new Philips 962SA will also output PAL progressive. There's a pretty extensive thread over on AVS Forum where it's covered. Make sure you read up on the hacks because turning PAL on in these Philips players can undo other hacks or seriously mess up the players permanently. It's a long thread, but definitely worth the read if you're in Europe and want PAL progressive output.

#9 of 13 OFFLINE   Chris Valder

Chris Valder


  • 6 posts
  • Join Date: May 28 2002

Posted June 05 2002 - 08:44 AM

Thanks for all the help. Together with more reading there seems to be 2 ways to link to the Sony 10HT assuming a spend of about £1000.
First option. An expensive DVD player that outputs PAL as PAL and NTSC as NTSC both with progressive scanning (good chips)
Second option. Spend about £700 on an Iscan Pro line-doubler and use the residual £300 to buy a non progressive DVD player. This will allow line doubling on other sources such as VCR and satellite TV.
Which option would people go with.
If the second one what cheap (£300) DVD player would fit the bill. Toshiba have good reviews.
Thanks again Chris

#10 of 13 OFFLINE   Don Munsil

Don Munsil

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 102 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 27 2000

Posted June 05 2002 - 09:16 AM

Personally, I'd recommend a Panasonic. They have the best MPEG decoder for interlaced output right now, largely because they don't have the chroma bug. The RP-91 in the US is excellent, but I don't know what the equivalent is in the UK. The RV-32 is a fine unit, not quite as good as the RP-91, but there's nothing wrong with it. They seem to have that in the UK, as I see that MailUK.com has one region free for £189. (Not that I recommend MailUK; I don't know anything about them. I was just looking to see what region-free players were available in the UK.)


#11 of 13 OFFLINE   Chris Valder

Chris Valder


  • 6 posts
  • Join Date: May 28 2002

Posted June 05 2002 - 10:56 AM

Before others reply to my question, what exactly is the chroma bug and how does it manifest itself.
Also by recommending a cheap player do you go along with the notion of using an external line doubler like the iscan.
Cheers Chris

#12 of 13 OFFLINE   Don Munsil

Don Munsil

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 102 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 27 2000

Posted June 05 2002 - 11:34 AM

The chroma bug is an error in the way progressive-flagged material has its chroma channel upsampled in the MPEG decoder.

Here's an article about it (written by me) that covers it in some detail:

Chroma bug article

As to your question, I have an iScan pro, and it's a good solution, and allows you to choose from a wider variety of DVD players. There is some signal degradation going through the iScan, but it's not huge. On test patterns, you can see the loss, but it's very very subtle on real movie material.

Really, the best solution is an iScan Pro *and* a good progressive DVD player, which is what I'm using. But the iScan will get you most of the goodness of a progressive player, and deinterlace your other sources as well.

Another option with the 10HT is nothing at all. The deinterlacer in the 10HT does not have a film mode, but is otherwise very good. A good deinterlacer with a film mode is a nice improvement, but don't expect huge changes. The improvements are good, but not overwhelming. Largely you'll see more detail on moving diagonal edges and moving high-detail areas like patterned wallpaper and faliage. The "nothing at all" approach will not get you the optimal video image, but does have the virtue of being very cheap. Posted Image


#13 of 13 OFFLINE   RobD


    Second Unit

  • 264 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 21 2003

Posted April 07 2003 - 08:43 AM

I too am considering PAL progressive but have the little brother of the VW10HT, the VPLHS1. Does anyone know if this projector supports Pal progressive?

Out of interest can it handle the HD signal from MUSE laserdisks too?

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users