Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

A few words about...™ Harry Potter - Hogwarts Collection -- in Blu-ray

Blu-ray 3D Blu-ray Warner A Few Words About

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 of 18 Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist

  • 7,321 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted June 26 2014 - 12:22 PM

With shelving filled with various incarnations of Special Editions, 3-D Editions, Special Features et al, I'm finally totally pleased with a Harry Potter product from WB.

 

Totally.

 

Produced without wands, bats, newt eyes are other interesting paraphernalia, Warners has finally cut to the chase, with the best product so far for those who desire to own these great films, along with all of the special features.

 

The discs are the same as earlier releases, but are now packaged in a gorgeous book, discs sliding into the requisite spots.  And this book is solid, and fits into another very solid protective case.

 

A total of 31 discs, inclusive of DVD versions, and now with the final two features offered in 3-D as well as 2.

 

Currently on sale at Amazon at a 48% discount -- $130 for the set, and worth every penny.  Works out to about $16 per multi-disc set.

 

Image - 5

 

Audio - 5

 

Highly Recommended.

 

RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#2 of 18 Josh Steinberg

Josh Steinberg

    Screenwriter

  • 2,199 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 10 2003
  • Real Name:Josh Steinberg

Posted June 26 2014 - 12:35 PM

I just sold my Wizards collection megabox and used some of the proceeds towards the purchase of this Hogwarts set (same exact discs, none of the toys), and I'm really happy.  All of the great content, but less than 50 pounds and smaller than a small refrigerator at last.  I had no idea the Wizards box was as giant sized as it turned out to be when I ordered it, and had been regretting it ever since it showed up at my house -- but I wanted the disc-based content so I was kinda stuck.  Finally happy here too.



#3 of 18 Jari K

Jari K

    Producer

  • 3,166 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2007

Posted June 26 2014 - 01:29 PM

"...and had been regretting it ever since it showed up at my house"

I haven't, since it's pretty unique. But it was obviously only a matter of time when they re-release it without the "stuff".
  • Josh Steinberg likes this

#4 of 18 Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist

  • 7,321 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted June 26 2014 - 02:05 PM

"...and had been regretting it ever since it showed up at my house"
I haven't, since it's pretty unique. But it was obviously only a matter of time when they re-release it without the "stuff".


In fairness to WB, it appears that this set was announced for a later release at the same time as the big box. Nothing hidden here.

RAH

"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#5 of 18 Josh Steinberg

Josh Steinberg

    Screenwriter

  • 2,199 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 10 2003
  • Real Name:Josh Steinberg

Posted June 26 2014 - 02:07 PM

I haven't, since it's pretty unique. But it was obviously only a matter of time when they re-release it without the "stuff".

 

To each his own, no judgment from me!  I just didn't have the room -- the problem with apartment/city living (which I otherwise love) is that there's only a finite amount of space.  The Harry Potter set didn't fit on a shelf or even in the same room with the rest of my movies.. so it was always relegated to being on a floor somewhere. 

 

But compared to a few of the other Warner box sets I've gotten, I appreciated that it was pretty nicely designed.  Everyone I showed the Harry Potter Wizards set had the same two reactions: first, "wow, this is beautiful" and then second, "This thing is huge, I'd have no place to put it."  At least two friends had been thinking about buying it until they saw my copy and saw how big it was.  But it was at least the best designed/nicest looking of their big sets that I've bought or almost bought.  I got the "Dark Knight Trilogy" ultimate box for the bonus disc, and it includes three cheap plastic toys, a slim hardcover of readily available stills I had already seen countless times before, and mini 8x10 villain posters that weren't representative of any previously released theatrical artwork, so basically nothing I wanted but the bonus disc.  So, that three movie (six disc) set, takes up more room on my shelf than this new Harry Potter 31 disc set, or the Bond 22 movie set.  That stuff drives me a little nuts.  When the Blade Runner final cut came out, I was still DVD only, and the only way to get the workprint on DVD was to buy the edition with the box of plastic toys.  I couldn't just not see the workprint after all that time, so the box set it was... but when I got a Blu-ray player, I was happy to be able to get the Blu-ray set with the workprint but without the toys.  I'd prefer the option of getting all the disc-based content without the padding.

 

With very few exceptions, I like the minimal amount of packaging possible, while still keeping close to the standard Blu-ray case size.  I just bought a copy of Criterion's "Hard Day's Night" Blu-ray as a gift for my little brother, and I was surprised at how huge that is -- it takes up the space of two or three individual titles.  Or in terms of shelf space, two copies of Hard Day's Night is about equal to this 31 disc set.

 

But back to Potter -- I'd watched maybe half of the bonus discs from the Wizards version of the set and really enjoyed everything, so I'm looking forward to finishing those discs on the Hogwarts edition.


  • cafink likes this

#6 of 18 Josh Steinberg

Josh Steinberg

    Screenwriter

  • 2,199 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 10 2003
  • Real Name:Josh Steinberg

Posted June 26 2014 - 02:11 PM

In fairness to WB, it appears that this set was announced for a later release at the same time as the big box. Nothing hidden here.

RAH

 

If that's the case, I missed the announcement - the Wizards set came out in Sept. 2012, and this Hogwarts set came out in 2014.  (First as an Amazon exclusive, I believe, then wider release more recently.)  Either way, I got the larger Wizards set onsale for about what the Hogwarts set goes for, so swapping one from the other wasn't a giant financial hit.  I do appreciate that Warner made that kind of multi-release advanced warning for their "Lord of the Rings" titles.


  • cafink likes this

#7 of 18 Jari K

Jari K

    Producer

  • 3,166 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2007

Posted June 26 2014 - 02:15 PM

"Nothing hidden here."

Perhaps the first time for you ( ;) ), but I believe you're wrong with this one. I don't think that they announced these at the same time. Wizard set is actually kinda old now. Perhaps it still feels new.

#8 of 18 JohnMor

JohnMor

    Producer

  • 3,114 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2004
  • Real Name:John Moreland
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted June 26 2014 - 04:06 PM

Personally, I love my Wizard's Collection (especially since it only cost me $149 at Costco).  But I totally understand how the average fan would just want all the discs alone in an easy-in, easy-out format.   


  • Josh Steinberg likes this

#9 of 18 Josh Steinberg

Josh Steinberg

    Screenwriter

  • 2,199 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 10 2003
  • Real Name:Josh Steinberg

Posted June 26 2014 - 04:13 PM

Personally, I love my Wizard's Collection (especially since it only cost me $149 at Costco).  But I totally understand how the average fan would just want all the discs alone in an easy-in, easy-out format.   

 

If the box came in the "bigger on the inside" magical bag that Hermoine has in Deathly Hallows Part 1, then I would have enjoyed it a lot more :)


  • JohnMor likes this

#10 of 18 Wayne_j

Wayne_j

    Second Unit

  • 421 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 07 2006
  • Real Name:Wayne

Posted June 26 2014 - 07:19 PM

I have all the individual UCE releases, all the same disc content as this set.



#11 of 18 Michel_Hafner

Michel_Hafner

    Supporting Actor

  • 716 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 28 2002

Posted June 27 2014 - 01:31 AM

Same poor bit rates on the early films (15 Mbit/s VC1) and mediocre ones on the later films? If so, no thanks. I'll wait for the 4K editions.



#12 of 18 Joe Caps

Joe Caps

    Screenwriter

  • 1,931 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 10 2000

Posted June 27 2014 - 04:44 AM

Please do not flame me for this.

 

I love the films, but at least half of them are tough to watch on vid.

 

Azkaban was tough even in the theater.     The picture is very plugged up ,even in bright daylight scenes.  No detail in even mildy dark areas..

 

Half  blood Prince and deathly hollows part one are the worst.

Not only is the look darker  and darker, but now also very dim, as iif J.K.Rowling relocated the series on a planet whose sun is dying and almost burt out.

How I wish they would remaster these.

I think Warner Vid took  Deathly Hollows Two into their own hands and brightened the picture.


  • ThadK likes this

#13 of 18 CraigF

CraigF

    Screenwriter

  • 2,311 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 2002
  • Real Name:Craig
  • LocationToronto area, Canada

Posted June 27 2014 - 12:31 PM

Yeah, with the continual repackagings/re-imaginings of these titles, and the very low prices that seem to still be getting lower, I'd like to think it means some better re-masterings of these titles is imminent (the first 3 especially). Christmas next year? Is there anybody who doesn't have these already, they're almost as worthless used as Bonds (which I guess is the intention of saturation)? I will certainly buy again in 4K...or maybe this is it, and they will never be sold as physical media beyond 1080p...



#14 of 18 JohnMor

JohnMor

    Producer

  • 3,114 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2004
  • Real Name:John Moreland
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted June 27 2014 - 01:10 PM

The first three look quite fine to me.



#15 of 18 CraigF

CraigF

    Screenwriter

  • 2,311 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 2002
  • Real Name:Craig
  • LocationToronto area, Canada

Posted June 27 2014 - 03:00 PM

^ So do the DVDs of them. I don't mind the DVDs, not everybody has a BDP, but just about everybody doesn't mind these movies so they're a safe "bring" for a wide range of ages (compared to what I'd really prefer to watch). :) The BDs could be a lot better, you can see the improvement starting at the fourth, it's the HD transfers that are lacking. IMO of course. Are the first three "scrunched" on 25GB discs? I forget.



#16 of 18 Ethan Riley

Ethan Riley

    Producer

  • 3,335 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 12 2005

Posted June 27 2014 - 03:22 PM

Why does movie #7 skip around all the time?


 

 


#17 of 18 Darby67

Darby67

    Second Unit

  • 260 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 04 2009

Posted June 27 2014 - 03:25 PM

I really wish WB would consider releasing a DVD-only version of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Parts 1 and 2 Ultimate Edition.  I have faithfully purchased all of the previous Ultimate Editions on DVD and was eagerly looking forward to completing my collection.  What a disappointment it was to find that they only released a Blu-ray combo version that has DVDs of the movies but no DVDs of the bonus features (including the final installments, parts 7 and 8, of the wonderful Creating the World of Harry Potter documentary).  This is truly a disservice to those of us who have supported the DVD releases of the Ultimate Edition line.

 

Darby


  • JohnMor and TravisR like this

#18 of 18 JoeDoakes

JoeDoakes

    Screenwriter

  • 1,750 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 01 2009
  • Real Name:Ray

Posted June 27 2014 - 09:43 PM

If this set had come with a set of Hogwarts coasters or an ash tray, it would easily be worth another $150.







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Blu-ray, 3D Blu-ray, Warner, A Few Words About

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users