- Joined
- Jul 3, 1997
- Messages
- 66,705
- Real Name
- Ronald Epstein
The link below will take you directly to the product on Amazon. If you are using an adblocker you will not see link.
Last edited by a moderator:
Just throwing this out there: why isn't Warner doing a quadruple feature with The Firm? They could do a 5-film pack with The Rainmaker, if they really wanted to.
Ernest
Supporting Actor
- Joined
- Dec 21, 1998
- Messages
- 849
Rainmaker is Paramount they should have included Runaway Jury.
Vegas 1
Supporting Actor
If I didn't already have these individual titles I would pick this up, a space saver!
And Warner is currently distributing some of Paramount's library, which is why I also suggested The Firm. Runaway Jury is Fox.Ernest said:
Drat! Already have two of the three in this list on Blu-ray.
hypnotoad8128
Grip
Because studio accountants - previously known as studio bosses - only want to cater to the under twenty, attention deficient demographic. Which means any film with what we would call a "plot" is cast aside for more idiotic fare that has explosions every twenty seconds.albert_m2 said:
Jason_V
Senior HTF Member
The Pelican Brief (1993): $195.2 millionalbert_m2 said:
The Client (1994): $117.6 million
The Chamber (1996, includes int'l): $22.5 million
A Time to Kill (1996): $152.2 million
The Rainmaker (1997, no int'l available): $45.9 million
The Runaway Jury (2003): $80.1 million
Per Box Office Mojo and worldwide grosses (when available). While Roger has his own ideas, I think the pattern is fairly clear. Runaway Jury, for instance, had a production budget of $60 million. Assume half of that for marketing and the movie did not break even in its original theatrical run. It never hit #1 in it's 19 weeks in the theater.
