Jump to content

* - - - - 3 votes

which do you prefer? Original Soundtrack Version or Soundalike/Replaced version?

  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#21 of 22 OFFLINE   Ron1973


    Beverly Hillbilles nut extraordinaire

  • 1,133 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 26 2012
  • Real Name:Ron Reagan (not that one!)
  • LocationSE Missouri

Posted April 25 2014 - 05:50 AM

those "recorded by the original artists" never sound as good


cuz the artist does not have the same singing talent as he did when he was younger


i thought we were talking about the original recording, re-mastered


i still dont know what studios mean by "re-mastered"


i always just thought it was a sales gimick ?


but perhaps there was some noise/hisses that were removed, to make it sound better ?

I've always leaned towards marketing gimmick. Mercury Nashville did a re-release of a Hank Williams gospel album with the line "original recordings remastered." All of the songs were from another release a few years back. I asked the question on Amazon were they not remastered already? Lol

Find me on Facebook


My blog


Jethro, how come there's no ice in Californy? ~ Uncle Jed


Don't look at me, I didn't take it! ~ Jethro

#22 of 22 OFFLINE   Neil Brock

Neil Brock


  • 2,098 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 29 2009

Posted April 25 2014 - 07:01 AM


This choice reminds me of an old commercial for a wine cooler in the 80s where they asked if people would rather have their wine cooler or a tax audit!

I was thinking of the commercial where they taste test soda, with a drink in one can and tennis balls in the other.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users