Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
* * * - - 1 votes

Twilight Time Announces March/April 2014 Releases

Twilight Time

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
141 replies to this topic

#41 of 142 OFFLINE   RolandL

RolandL

    Screenwriter



  • 2,354 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 11 2001
  • LocationCromwell, CT

Posted November 29 2013 - 10:17 AM

Unfortunately, it is a Twilight Time release, so when I purchase Used Cars I'll probably lament about the price - "That's too f**king high!"

 

Just a joke for the handful of people who have seen Used Cars.   :)   Actually very happy to see it getting a release.

 

- Walter.

 

"$50 never killed anybody"


  • Moe Dickstein likes this

Roland Lataille
Cinerama web site

 


#42 of 142 OFFLINE   schan1269

schan1269

    HTF Expert



  • 14,191 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 04 2012
  • Real Name:Sam
  • LocationChicago-ish/NW Indiana

Posted November 29 2013 - 10:44 AM

"$50 never killed anybody"

That's funny...LOL

 

Speaking of Alfredo Garcia(Isela actually)...

 

Maybe this means one day we'll get Drum. We got Mandingo.



#43 of 142 OFFLINE   cineMANIAC

cineMANIAC

    Screenwriter



  • 1,922 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 03 2008
  • Real Name:Luis
  • LocationNew York City

Posted November 29 2013 - 04:07 PM

Watched the Alfredo Garcia trailer and I'm not sure what to make of it - looks like an arthouse political thriller. A $35 blind-buy might be out of the question for me. 


 

 


#44 of 142 OFFLINE   Bob Cashill

Bob Cashill

    Screenwriter



  • 2,205 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 15 2001

Posted December 02 2013 - 08:55 PM

Though intriguing in its own, road to hell way, ALFREDO GARCIA is unclassifiable--not really arthouse, political, or much of a thriller. 


Edited by Bob Cashill, December 02 2013 - 08:58 PM.


#45 of 142 OFFLINE   Mark Edward Heuck

Mark Edward Heuck

    Screenwriter



  • 1,151 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 25 2000

Posted December 03 2013 - 12:59 AM

I'm hoping TT will be able to port the very funny commentary track for USED CARS with Kurt Russell and Robert Zemeckis - it's informative and Russell is a great raconteur.

 

Maybe the trailers too?

Also glad to see FEVER PITCH return via their Film4 deal - a very underrated Nick Hornby story with a fun Colin Firth performance.


"As I looked back over my life, I realized that I enjoyed nothing--not art, not sex--more than going to the movies." -- Gore Vidal

#46 of 142 OFFLINE   Richard V

Richard V

    Screenwriter



  • 1,559 posts
  • Join Date: May 14 2009
  • Real Name:Richard

Posted December 03 2013 - 04:47 AM

Used Cars, All the King's Men, and ESPECIALLY Conrak for me, a film that is SHAMEFULLY long, long, long overdue..  Now if someone at Twilight Time would discover Where the Lillies Bloom I'd have another of my Holy Grails.


See you at the pah-ty, Richter.

#47 of 142 OFFLINE   ROclockCK

ROclockCK

    Screenwriter



  • 1,135 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 13 2013
  • Real Name:Steve
  • LocationHigh Country, Alberta, Canada

Posted December 03 2013 - 09:01 AM

*
POPULAR

For anyone perceiving a shift in Twilight Time's product focus by era, you're not imagining it: 

 

gftp.png

 

This chart includes both Blu-rays and DVDs. In brackets are the (sellouts) during each period. The asterisk indicates 2014 product through April '14, none yet for sale.

 

It's clear that TT's 2011 debut catalogue practically belonged to the 50s & 60s. 2012 saw a spike in 50s titles, however in 2013, that bias shifted almost as dramatically to the 70s. So far in 2014, their mix seems more evenly spread out across the decades, with an edge given to the 60s and 70s, but again continuing retrenchment from the 50s.

 

Anyway, just the kind of stuff you notice when you have a few minutes to spare during a 'snow day'... ;)


Edited by ROclockCK, December 03 2013 - 09:53 AM.

  • Adam Gregorich, Twilight Time and BPullen like this

#48 of 142 OFFLINE   John Hermes

John Hermes

    Supporting Actor



  • 775 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2007
  • Real Name:John Hermes
  • LocationLa Mesa (San Diego) CA

Posted December 03 2013 - 09:37 AM

For anyone perceiving a shift in Twilight Time's product focus by era, you're not imagining it: 

 

1lxo.png

 

This chart includes both Blu-rays and DVDs. In brackets are the (sellouts) during each period. The asterisk indicates 2014 product through April '14, none yet for sale.

 

It's clear that TT's 2011 debut catalogue practically belonged to the 50s & 60s. 2012 saw a spike in 50s titles, however in 2013, that bias shifted almost as dramatically to the 70s. So far in 2014, their mix seems more evenly spread out across the decades, with an edge given to the 60s and 70s, but again continuing retrenchment from the 50s.

 

Anyway, just the kind of stuff you notice when you have a few minutes to spare during a 'snow day'... ;)

I hardly look forward to each month's announcements like I used to.



#49 of 142 OFFLINE   dana martin

dana martin

    Screenwriter



  • 1,929 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 28 2003
  • Real Name:Dana Martin
  • LocationNorfolk, VA

Posted December 03 2013 - 09:53 AM

I hardly look forward to each month's announcements like I used to.

 

I have the opposite approach, clearly they are releasing more titles than they did in the first year,  two  a month was the average, now that is up to three, and while some may complain, I think that they are giving a good mix of more contemporary and classic catalogue titles.

 

All complaints aside, how many of the major studios are doing the same on a monthly basis?    


Playing at the Drive In

Quote:Welles, Kubrick, Hitchcock, Spielberg, Jackson, Wood ?? a true Auteur should be one who follows his artistic vision

#50 of 142 OFFLINE   Moe Dickstein

Moe Dickstein

    Filmmaker



  • 3,149 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2001
  • Real Name:T R Wilkinson
  • LocationSherman Oaks, CA

Posted December 03 2013 - 11:23 AM

Also you have to consider they may have run through the older titles that are "ready to go" and don't have an endless selection of any film they want - the transfer has to be done and of acceptable quality
  • Adam Gregorich likes this
Yes, these strange things happen all the time - PT Anderson, Magnolia

#51 of 142 OFFLINE   Twilight Time

Twilight Time

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 127 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2011

Posted December 03 2013 - 11:46 AM

*
POPULAR

For anyone perceiving a shift in Twilight Time's product focus by era, you're not imagining it: 

 

gftp.png

 

This chart includes both Blu-rays and DVDs. In brackets are the (sellouts) during each period. The asterisk indicates 2014 product through April '14, none yet for sale.

 

It's clear that TT's 2011 debut catalogue practically belonged to the 50s & 60s. 2012 saw a spike in 50s titles, however in 2013, that bias shifted almost as dramatically to the 70s. So far in 2014, their mix seems more evenly spread out across the decades, with an edge given to the 60s and 70s, but again continuing retrenchment from the 50s.

 

Anyway, just the kind of stuff you notice when you have a few minutes to spare during a 'snow day'... ;)

Thanks, Steve, we learn a lot about our business from your dinky charts and graphs…as you can see though, our commitment to the 1960s is rock-solid, and we have, mostly through our new deal with MGM/UA, greater access to classics from the 1970s than we had before (the 70s being a seminal decade in American filmmaking.) However, we have backed away a little bit from the 1950s, which is undoubtedly the most challenging decade sales-wise…we still have quite a few in the hopper but they have to be more strategically placed, meaning grouped with titles that are likely better sellers. In 2013 we released 28 titles, in 2014, we anticipate releasing a minimum of 56. While this may ultimately prove to be a foolhardy step-up in output, by this time next year we will have a real handle on the Blu-ray market, and will tailor our schedule accordingly in 2015...

 

all best,

 

Nick.


  • Adam Gregorich, Moe Dickstein, dana martin and 9 others like this
";s:7:"insider

#52 of 142 OFFLINE   lukejosephchung

lukejosephchung

    Screenwriter



  • 1,230 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 31 2007
  • Real Name:Luke J. Chung
  • LocationSan Francisco, CA., USA

Posted December 03 2013 - 02:39 PM

Thanks, Steve, we learn a lot about our business from your dinky charts and graphs…as you can see though, our commitment to the 1960s is rock-solid, and we have, mostly through our new deal with MGM/UA, greater access to classics from the 1970s than we had before (the 70s being a seminal decade in American filmmaking.) However, we have backed away a little bit from the 1950s, which is undoubtedly the most challenging decade sales-wise…we still have quite a few in the hopper but they have to be more strategically placed, meaning grouped with titles that are likely better sellers. In 2013 we released 28 titles, in 2014, we anticipate releasing a minimum of 56. While this may ultimately prove to be a foolhardy step-up in output, by this time next year we will have a real handle on the Blu-ray market, and will tailor our schedule accordingly in 2015...

 

all best,

 

Nick.

An average release crop of 4-5 titles/month, Nick? Considering how well-presented and chosen your titles are, I'm all for it!!! :thumbs-up-smiley:


Edited by lukejosephchung, December 03 2013 - 02:40 PM.

  • Twilight Time likes this

#53 of 142 OFFLINE   Twilight Time

Twilight Time

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 127 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2011

Posted December 03 2013 - 02:51 PM

An average release crop of 4-5 titles/month, Nick? Considering how well-presented and chosen your titles are, I'm all for it!!! :thumbs-up-smiley:

Yes, that's the way it shakes out, although we are mindful of the fact that releasing 5 titles per month places a strain on those who like to collect all our releases…but in a sense it's the law of physics, the more studios that come on board ( and we are currently negotiating with another), the more titles we are obligated to put out…but we'll soon learn if we are trying to do too much too soon...


  • lukejosephchung and BPullen like this
";s:7:"insider

#54 of 142 OFFLINE   ROclockCK

ROclockCK

    Screenwriter



  • 1,135 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 13 2013
  • Real Name:Steve
  • LocationHigh Country, Alberta, Canada

Posted December 03 2013 - 03:02 PM

Thanks, Steve, we learn a lot about our business from your dinky charts and graphs…

 

*sigh*...too many years in Technical Communications Nick. Sometimes I just gotta see that chart or graph to understand my own point, you know? For example, off the top, I would have bet a fin that your initial roster for '14 was skewing much newer, when, in fact, the numbers say it's a fairly even distribution (so far) across film eras, slightly favouring the 70s.

 

…as you can see though, our commitment to the 1960s is rock-solid, and we have, mostly through our new deal with MGM/UA, greater access to classics from the 1970s than we had before (the 70s being a seminal decade in American filmmaking.) However, we have backed away a little bit from the 1950s, which is undoubtedly the most challenging decade sales-wise…we still have quite a few in the hopper but they have to be more strategically placed, meaning grouped with titles that are likely better sellers.

 

Unfortunately, the 50s well into the 60s could be considered seminal eras too...but more so in terms of the art and craft of film music. Actually, I'm reminded of your commentary on the Fantastic Voyage disc where you rightly noted how innovative - even daring - this period was for A-list studio scoring, especially at Fox under Lionel Newman. I certainly understand the 'Sophie's Choice' economics of TT championing too many obscure movies from the 50s or 60s with interesting scores, but I think a lot of your pokier 50s titles in particular might have sold better if score vets like you and/or academic peers such as Bond and Burlingame had laid down some feisty discussion about why that title mattered and still does. In fact, it was through your FV score discussion that I first learned about the Leonard Rosenman/Alex North connection circa the early 50s...duet or ensemble, what a great commentary Pony Soldier could have had! 

 

Of course, you guys must do what you need to do market-wise to keep those catalogue taps flowing; I understand that. But the 50s through 60s were also very fertile ground creatively, especially at the composer end of things. There's still more to that story trapped inside your bean...

 

BTW, when do we get some Lalo?      

 

In 2013 we released 28 titles, in 2014, we anticipate releasing a minimum of 56. While this may ultimately prove to be a foolhardy step-up in output, by this time next year we will have a real handle on the Blu-ray market, and will tailor our schedule accordingly in 2015...

 

Hmmm...I still count 29. Is it possible you are forgetting Christine because the infernal thing came and went so fast? ;)


  • BPullen likes this

#55 of 142 OFFLINE   bujaki

bujaki

    Supporting Actor



  • 852 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2012
  • Real Name:Jose Ortiz-Marrero
  • LocationRichardson, TX

Posted December 03 2013 - 03:07 PM

I have been buying all your releases, sometimes against my wife's wishes. But I have prevailed, since I own them all. However, as you state, an average of 5 releases per month @ $30 each is a bit rich for a retiree. I shall continue to support you in all your efforts to the best of my financial ability. I appreciate the excellent work you are doing and I am sure you will continue to hold to your high standards. Best of luck!



#56 of 142 OFFLINE   ahollis

ahollis

    Producer



  • 5,785 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 01 2007
  • Real Name:Allen
  • LocationNew Orleans

Posted December 03 2013 - 03:12 PM

Yes, that's the way it shakes out, although we are mindful of the fact that releasing 5 titles per month places a strain on those who like to collect all our releases…but in a sense it's the law of physics, the more studios that come on board ( and we are currently negotiating with another), the more titles we are obligated to put out…but we'll soon learn if we are trying to do too much too soon...


If you need any help, I will certainly volunteer. 👍
  • Adam Gregorich likes this
"Get a director and a writer and leave them alone. That`s how the best pictures get made" - William "Wild Bill" Wellman


#57 of 142 OFFLINE   JoHud

JoHud

    Screenwriter



  • 2,705 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 11 2007
  • Real Name:Joe Hudak

Posted December 03 2013 - 05:14 PM

Thanks, Steve, we learn a lot about our business from your dinky charts and graphs…as you can see though, our commitment to the 1960s is rock-solid, and we have, mostly through our new deal with MGM/UA, greater access to classics from the 1970s than we had before (the 70s being a seminal decade in American filmmaking.)

 

Also, I think the decades will continue to skew moreso to the 60s and 70s largely due to the recent MGM deal.  While they have some good 50s titles, anything in that library from the 40s or earlier is largely from their share of the Monogram library and a smattering of independently copyrighted films.  Even MGM during it's DVD heyday barely went into their Monogram holdings with the notable exception of the Charlie Chan films, and that largely stems from many of those Monogram films having fallen into the public domain.

 

I mean, I'd like someone to remaster those pre-50s MGM-owned films because what has filtered out (again, excepting Chan and a few others) has been pretty ancient in terms of their video and audio transfers, but I seriously doubt TT or MGM would go through the trouble.


Edited by JoHud, December 03 2013 - 05:16 PM.


#58 of 142 OFFLINE   Steve...O

Steve...O

    Producer



  • 3,285 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 2003
  • Real Name:Steve

Posted December 03 2013 - 06:58 PM

*
POPULAR

I don't get the negativity towards TT that I sense in some of the posts.  Not all of their releases appeal to me and I only buy the ones that I know I'll watch, but I do appreciate and respect the diversity of titles that they release because there is certainly something for everyone in their catalog.   Their work is also first rate from the transfers to the supplements.  They also get mega kudos for including English subtitles and being "fan friendly".     Their approach, in my opinion, is much better than one which releases an enormous amount of product but at the expense of quality which leads the consumer to regard them as missed opportunities.

 

Please keep up the great work, Nick, and best wishes for continued success in 2014 and beyond!


  • dana martin, SAhmed, ahollis and 1 other like this
Please help UCLA restore the Laurel & Hardy films: https://www.cinema.u...aurel-and-hardy

#59 of 142 OFFLINE   JohnMor

JohnMor

    Producer



  • 3,417 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2004
  • Real Name:John Moreland
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA

Posted December 03 2013 - 07:13 PM

I agree, Steve.  I love the diversity of their catalogue.



#60 of 142 OFFLINE   mikeyhitchfan

mikeyhitchfan

    Second Unit



  • 477 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2012
  • Real Name:Mike
  • LocationCosta Mesa CA

Posted December 03 2013 - 08:27 PM

Thanks, Steve, we learn a lot about our business from your dinky charts and graphs…as you can see though, our commitment to the 1960s is rock-solid, and we have, mostly through our new deal with MGM/UA, greater access to classics from the 1970s than we had before (the 70s being a seminal decade in American filmmaking.) However, we have backed away a little bit from the 1950s, which is undoubtedly the most challenging decade sales-wise…we still have quite a few in the hopper but they have to be more strategically placed, meaning grouped with titles that are likely better sellers. In 2013 we released 28 titles, in 2014, we anticipate releasing a minimum of 56. While this may ultimately prove to be a foolhardy step-up in output, by this time next year we will have a real handle on the Blu-ray market, and will tailor our schedule accordingly in 2015...

 

all best,

 

Nick.

 

Any chance of getting some MGM/UA Hitchcock releases like The Paradine Case, Sabotage or Young And Innocent?







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Twilight Time

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users