Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

A few words about...™ Russian Ark -- in Blu-ray

A Few Words About Kino Blu-ray

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 of 8 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,598 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted November 10 2013 - 05:04 PM

Alexander Sokurov's 2002 Russian Ark is, in it's most simple terms, a very nice tour of the Hermitage Museum in St. Petersburg, Russia.

 

If that was the part and parcel of the film, ie. a nice documentary, we'd not have a great deal to discuss.

 

Russian Ark is one of the most exhilarating experiences for any lover of the cinema that's come along in decades.

 

Continuously moving, seeking, dancing, walking, turning and discovering...

 

This is a 99 minute film.

 

In a single take.

 

Let's try that again.

 

IN A SINGLE TAKE!

 

Photographed in HD with a Sony CineAlta and Canon lens, and then taken to 35mm, it stuns the senses, and leaves you in a constant state of wonder.

 

A note about quality.  It was shot on HD in 2002.  Some dark sequences are a bit noisy.  It it bothers you, get over it.  It is what it is.

 

A great cinema achievement.  And a film that  knocks me out every time I view it -- finally here in Blu-ray from Kino Lorber.

 

According to iMDb, which is unfortunately filled with errors, it was the first film shot on uncompressed HD.  The first three takes were stopped, and the fourth won the day.  Image being a player that somehow forces a shutdown at the 90 minute mark.

 

The cinematographer, Tilman Buttner is a Steadicam Operator.

 

Image - 5

 

Audio - 5

 

Very Highly Recommended.

 

RAH


  • ROclockCK likes this

"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#2 of 8 OFFLINE   schan1269

schan1269

    HTF Expert



  • 14,466 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 04 2012
  • Real Name:Sam
  • LocationChicago-ish/NW Indiana

Posted November 10 2013 - 05:20 PM

This belongs in any serious cinephiles collection.

#3 of 8 OFFLINE   Felix Martinez

Felix Martinez

    Screenwriter



  • 1,455 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 27 2001
  • LocationSouth Florida

Posted November 10 2013 - 06:14 PM

Thanks for the words, I'm very much looking forward to this as I felt the DVD was quite hard on the eyes, lacking detail, etc. 

 

I wonder if you know or can tell by the image - is the blu-ray derived from the HD master, or a 35mm element?



#4 of 8 OFFLINE   ROclockCK

ROclockCK

    Screenwriter



  • 1,178 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 13 2013
  • Real Name:Steve
  • LocationHigh Country, Alberta, Canada

Posted November 10 2013 - 09:22 PM

When I saw this theatrically, I wasn't entirely prepared for the magnificent ambition of the 'stunt'. Surely during its running time there would be some convenient cutaways...or quick dissolves...or matching cuts...like Hitchcock's Rope...to discretely patch over scenes and shots.

 

Nope. They really did it all in one mind-bogglingly complex take, which, by itself would have been merely a curious cinematic footnote had Sokurov and his team not done it so damn well. Not only was Russian Ark beautiful and exhilarating to watch, but it was brimming with fascinating historical and cultural detail. As art, it walked the walk...and danced the dance.

 

Thanks so much for drawing attention to this unique cinematic achievement RAH!



#5 of 8 OFFLINE   Malcolm Bmoor

Malcolm Bmoor

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 98 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 27 2004
  • Real Name:Malcolm Blackmoor
  • LocationUK

Posted November 11 2013 - 03:10 AM

This was made at a time when professional camcorders used 35 minute Digibeta tapes and I never understood how a cameraman, apparently unattached to anybody else carrying a larger recorder, was able to record for so long. The result, however it was achieved, must have made a far heavier than normal Steadicam rig. I once trespassed from my role as sound recordist and walked around a large studio wearing the usual Steadicam of that time and a few minutes was quite enough.

 

An amazing achievement and rivetting viewing when I first saw it.  I always suspected that there were, of necessity,  a few well hidden joins so my admiration has increased to hear that there weren't.


Malcolm Blackmoor

#6 of 8 OFFLINE   Patrick McCart

Patrick McCart

    Lead Actor



  • 7,477 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001
  • Real Name:Patrick McCart
  • LocationAlpharetta, GA, USA

Posted November 11 2013 - 06:46 AM

One of my favorite films. The glassy smooth Steadicam work and long take make this like a dream. Besides the incredible technical aspect, it's a wonderful celebration of culture. I do love how there's so many points in the film where it would have been ridiculously easy to hide a cut. Sokorov could have either decided to digitally stitch takes together or avoid moments that "could be" where cuts were hidden to show off the idea. That's confident filmmaking.

 

It looks like Kino brought over the making-of (which is on both the excellent Artificial Eye DVD and less than excellent PAL ghosted Wellspring). It's just as much worth viewing as the film!



#7 of 8 OFFLINE   Patrick H.

Patrick H.

    Second Unit



  • 476 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 23 2004

Posted November 11 2013 - 09:46 AM

Question:  In the review over at DVDBeaver, the making-of doc looks horizontally-stretched into 16x9.  Is that actually the case?



#8 of 8 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,598 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted November 11 2013 - 03:13 PM

Question:  In the review over at DVDBeaver, the making-of doc looks horizontally-stretched into 16x9.  Is that actually the case?

 

Stretched.  No.  A bit of wide angle distortion.  Yes.

 

RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: A Few Words About, Kino, Blu-ray

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users