It's vintage.TonyD said:
It's actually a better movie than it's reputation suggests, but like many a 3D movie of the 50s, it's become kinda forgotten over the years except for by 3D buffs. Certainly it's better than The Nebraskan or Flight to Tangier. It has some amusing dialogue, great gimmick shots, and it's short enough to not overstay it's welcome. It's also one of those 3D movies that really needs to be seen in 3D to be fully appreciated. But that's okay, since with the exception of a few crap conversions over the past few years, you can say that about nearly any 3D movie. After all, watching a 3D movie in 2D is like watching a Scope movie in pan and scan IMHO.TonyD said:
Yes, I thought it was odd when Criterion released Flesh for Frankenstein on DVD in 2D. I would never watch that movie unless it was in 3D. I saw it in 3D at a movie theatre when its title was Andy Warhol's Frankenstein and was rated X. Very strange movie but great 3D.Todd J Moore said:
My guess is that, if Criterion revisits this for Blu-ray, they will include the 3-D version. They've already done PINA that way.
