Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
3D Blu-ray Reviews

Star Trek Into Darkness 3D Blu-Ray Review

Blu-ray Paramount

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
75 replies to this topic

#61 of 76 OFFLINE   Carlo Medina

Carlo Medina

    Executive Producer



  • 10,004 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 31 1997

Posted September 18 2013 - 02:27 PM

Not trying to change your opinion at all Craig, but I think a movie like ST:ID which is getting an 8.0 on IMDB (the same as the 2009 reboot) probably doesn't qualify for the Star Trek odd/even numbered curse.


XBox Live: TheL1brarian (let's play Destiny on XB1)


#62 of 76 OFFLINE   Gary Seven

Gary Seven

    Grand Poo Pah



  • 1,503 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 15 2003
  • Real Name:Gaston
  • LocationLake Worth, Florida

Posted September 18 2013 - 02:35 PM

As a side note, I don't know how many here used to (or maybe still do) read the Star Trek novels but Ann Crispin (A.C. Crispin) passed away to cancer last week (RIP , Ann).  She wrote some VERY good Star Trek novels (as well as many others).  I met her some 30 years ago with Margaret Bonnano (another author).  I was reading her last post on her blog and I saw earlier she posted on her feelings on this movie.  While she too was not impressed, she did point me to a blog that had an insightful review by one of the more current Star Trek novel writers, Keith de Candido.  I thought some of you might find it interesting.  I think it's an even handed analysis...

 

http://www.tor.com/b...urce=newsletter


Edited by Gary Seven, September 18 2013 - 02:36 PM.


#63 of 76 ONLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul



  • 23,023 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted September 18 2013 - 03:36 PM

As a side note, I don't know how many here used to (or maybe still do) read the Star Trek novels but Ann Crispin (A.C. Crispin) passed away to cancer last week (RIP , Ann).  She wrote some VERY good Star Trek novels (as well as many others).

Yeah, she wrote the really cool Han Solo origin books for Star Wars too.



#64 of 76 OFFLINE   CraigF

CraigF

    Screenwriter



  • 2,381 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 20 2002
  • Real Name:Craig
  • LocationToronto area, Canada

Posted September 18 2013 - 04:07 PM

Not trying to change your opinion at all Craig, but I think a movie like ST:ID which is getting an 8.0 on IMDB (the same as the 2009 reboot) probably doesn't qualify for the Star Trek odd/even numbered curse.

I know. Just about everybody seemed to like this movie. I admit I may not have been in the best of moods when I first saw the movie, thus my getting annoyed at a movie for pete's sake, so decided to watch it the next day too. I think I was just tired because it went down much better the second time. I still didn't like that bluey-green tinge to so many scenes, it seems in vogue in too many SF films.


Edited by CraigF, September 18 2013 - 04:10 PM.


#65 of 76 OFFLINE   Michael Rogers

Michael Rogers

    Supporting Actor



  • 736 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 2005

Posted September 18 2013 - 06:56 PM

Good review. I noted how the slash fans were going to have a field day with some scenes in STID.

As a side note, I don't know how many here used to (or maybe still do) read the Star Trek novels but Ann Crispin (A.C. Crispin) passed away to cancer last week (RIP , Ann).  She wrote some VERY good Star Trek novels (as well as many others).  I met her some 30 years ago with Margaret Bonnano (another author).  I was reading her last post on her blog and I saw earlier she posted on her feelings on this movie.  While she too was not impressed, she did point me to a blog that had an insightful review by one of the more current Star Trek novel writers, Keith de Candido.  I thought some of you might find it interesting.  I think it's an even handed analysis... http://www.tor.com/b...urce=newsletter



#66 of 76 OFFLINE   Carlo Medina

Carlo Medina

    Executive Producer



  • 10,004 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 31 1997

Posted September 19 2013 - 11:39 PM

Wow so okay I finally downloaded the 10GB iTunes version (5.3GB for the digital copy of the movie, 6GB for the extras). I can sort of understand why the commentary wasn't released on the disc because it's about 20+ minutes longer than the real movie. While the commentary is going, they'll freeze the movie, draw circles around things they're talking about, PIP, etc. Not your standard running commentary while the movie itself is going.

 

But the thing that pisses me off...

 

Only in the commentary version do you get the changing IMAX aspect ratios ala The Dark Knight Blu-Ray. The digital copy of the film itself is 2.40:1 just like the BD, but the running commentary version gives you the switching aspect ratios. Unfortunately if you want to watch the movie this way, you cannot, without having to have the commentary, PIP, pauses, circles around parts of the picture, etc. So this part to me was like insult to injury. Teasing us with the fact that a variable aspect ratio version was available, but they've chosen not to give it to us unless you're watching the commentary version.


XBox Live: TheL1brarian (let's play Destiny on XB1)


#67 of 76 ONLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul



  • 23,023 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted September 20 2013 - 04:03 AM

Wow so okay I finally downloaded the 10GB iTunes version (5.3GB for the digital copy of the movie, 6GB for the extras). I can sort of understand why the commentary wasn't released on the disc because it's about 20+ minutes longer than the real movie. While the commentary is going, they'll freeze the movie, draw circles around things they're talking about, PIP, etc. Not your standard running commentary while the movie itself is going.

I think they should have put the 'commentary version' of the movie on a second disc and dropped the DVD from the set.



#68 of 76 OFFLINE   Nelson Au

Nelson Au

    Executive Producer



  • 11,678 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 1999

Posted September 20 2013 - 07:01 AM

Gary, thanks for the tor.com review. That was good.If I can, I'll try to download the iTunes version this weekend. I wonder if the digital copy, non commentary version is variable aspect ratio too. Probably not!

#69 of 76 OFFLINE   Carlo Medina

Carlo Medina

    Executive Producer



  • 10,004 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 31 1997

Posted September 20 2013 - 07:22 AM

Gary, thanks for the tor.com review. That was good.If I can, I'll try to download the iTunes version this weekend. I wonder if the digital copy, non commentary version is variable aspect ratio too. Probably not!

Sadly, no it is not (see my previous post)


XBox Live: TheL1brarian (let's play Destiny on XB1)


#70 of 76 ONLINE   Tino

Tino

    Producer



  • 6,026 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999
  • Real Name:Valentino
  • LocationMetro NYC

Posted September 20 2013 - 07:58 AM

I wasn't pissed about all this until I watched the iTunes extra. It's great and should have been included with the regular 3D combo set. My Dell PC was starting to crap out so I decided to splurge and get an iMac and one of the great features is I am now able to stream that enhanced commentary to my tv via Apple airplay. It's awesome. Only cost me close to two grand to do it though. ;)
It's gonna be a hell of a ride. I'm ready. .

#71 of 76 OFFLINE   Rex Bachmann

Rex Bachmann

    Screenwriter



  • 1,975 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 10 2001
  • Real Name:Rex Bachmann

Posted November 28 2013 - 11:26 AM

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"]Nelson Au wrote (post #4):[/font]

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"][color=rgb(0,168,107);]In regards to the plot Gary (which I agree with your assessment), and with apologies to Neil, I just discovered these Honest Trailers on YouTube and their take on this movie is great![/color][/font]

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"]Good one! Sometimes I think you do "get it", after all.


And then, too, sometimes I think you don't[/font]
;)[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"]:
 
 (post #58)[/font]

 

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"][color=rgb(0,168,107);] I still have issues, but I understand what the screen writers were up to, with the homage to Wrath of Khan.[/color][/font]

 

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"] "Homage"?!? [/font]

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"] How 'bout "gold-digging"?  "Plagiarism"?  "Lazy, unimaginative writing"?   Or, better still, try "outright stealing".[/font]

 

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"][color=rgb(0,168,107);]And Pegg for me isn't Scotty. He is coming off as too jokey. Scotty was serious if you watch the series.[/color][/font]

 

 

 

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"]Hoot, mahn! Ya canna expect a silk perse from a sow's ear!  Almost none of the movie characters have been their tv selves.  Tv Kirk, for instance, broke regulations when he had to, but not like the Rebel-without-a-Cause nudnik namesake now on screen![/font]

 

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"][color=rgb(0,168,107);]I hope Spock becomes more like Spock in the next film . . . .[/color][/font]

 

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"]He won't.[/font]

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"][color=rgb(0,168,107);]. . . and they explore space.[/color][/font]

 

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"]They won't.  (The first clue you'll get to that effect will be when they mention that they're not goïng to tell you who the villain will be.)[/font]

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"]Ted Van Duyn wrote (post #13):[/font]
 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"][color=rgb(153,102,51);]. . . don't be surprised if the next movie either involves the crew back on Earth, or dealing with another bad guy who wants to specifically attack Earth since that's been the motive for the last three movies in a row.

I'm still not convinced that the folks working on this new take want anything to do with exploration or seeking out new life.[/color][/font]

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"]They've probably already told you what the next film (or films) is going to be about

Admiral Marcus: "Kirk, war with the Klingons is inevitable." ("Errand of Mercy", anyone?)[/font]

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"]Unending explosions and light shows (a.k.a. flash-and-boom), with a little T&A thrown-in ("Turn around!") are far easier to produce for audiences that think "thrill-rides" make good movies than ones that explore the nature of human existence or the "why?-of-it-all".  Those audiences will do fine with alien bars and rock music. ("CONSUME NOW!") Why work when you don't have to?[/font]

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"]No, it's ♫"Retread City, Retread City"♫ from now on out for this ridiculously overpriced $200,000,000+-a-pop genericized movie franchise.  Get used to it and/or move on.[/font]

 

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"]From what I have been able to glean from the few online sources I care to explore, there exist a few deleted scenes, one reportedly a shower scene with Mr. Cumberbatch in the altogether ("Why?", you ask?  What were they thinking?) to this film.  Does anyone know whether any of the multifarious physical versions of the BRD edition have these scenes?  [/font]

 

[font="'times new roman', times, serif;"]Thanks.[/font]

 


"Delenda est . . . . "

 


#72 of 76 OFFLINE   benbess

benbess

    Screenwriter



  • 1,890 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 07 2009

Posted November 30 2013 - 10:42 PM

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]Like some other fans[/font][font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"], I like parts of the JJA Reboot of Trek, and in other ways I find it problematic.[/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]In terms of what I like, I'm glad that it's restored the Trek brand name, which has helped pave the way for these restorations. [/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]I also mostly like the chemistry that the new cast has together. [/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]In terms of action and excitement and big FX, it [/font][font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]definitely has those, but like many fans I think JJA's obsession with huge "action," is a mixed thing at best. [/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]I also like some of the things they revived, like section 31 from DS9. That was a cool and thought-provoking part of the movie.[/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]In terms of what I don't like, there are a few things that are annoying or more than that. [/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]First, I think the apocalypse for the planet Vulcan was rather extreme. I don't think the payoff for that was worth it. Killing off 99% of the most beloved people in Trek was something that I can't quite forgive. Yeah, I know it's all pretend, but it still bugs me.[/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]Second, little tech points from the past were ignored. Now Engineering looks like a brewery?? The Enterprise was built on Earth?? The ship goes under water?? I guess. That stuff doesn't bug me nearly as much as blowing up Vulcan, but it doesn't help. [/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]Third, Kirk sometimes seems like a frat boy now. Shatner's Kirk was right up against that line, and maybe he crossed it a couple times, but somehow Pine's Kirk just stays there a bit too long. The new Kirk doesn't command respect in the same way imho.[/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]Fourth, the endless action eventually becomes exhausting and lowers the IQ of the film. Star Trek didn't always do it, esp. in the movies, but it was supposed to be somewhat thought-provoking. New Trek tries, but I think more often misses the ship. [/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]Fifth, the blowing up of Vulcan, as a consequence, killed the "Prime" universe. In other words, as we all know, none of Next Gen ever happened. Or, it happened in another time line, but that's a distinction without much of a difference from the perspective of New Trek. [/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]Like most of you, however, I choose to still keep my imagination of Trek in the Prime Trek Universe. For me the JJA Trek Universe is the alternate path, some alternate universe where things went wrong.[/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]In other words, we can play the record the Captain Kirk's Starlog from The City on the Edge of Forever, and with a few changes it may say part of what I feel sometimes:[/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]"Captain's log, no stardate. For us, time does not exist. J.J. Abrams, back somewhere in the past, has effected a change in the course of time. All Earth history has been changed. There is no Starship Enterprise 1701-D. We have only one chance. We have asked the Guardian to show us Trek's history again: Spock and I will go back into time ourselves and attempt to set right whatever it was that J.J. Abrams has changed."[/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]If only![/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]Actually, I am entertained by the new movies. I own both of them. And, as I said, I am very glad they have revived the Trek name.[/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]I was actually shocked that at the last Las Vegas Trek convention Into Darkness was voted by fans the worst of all twelve Star Trek movies. What? Worse than 5? Worse than Insurrection? I'd rate it at least a ahead of those two, and maybe even ahead of one or two more.[/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]Anyone else with thoughts on the bigger picture of Trek?[/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]In terms of Prime Trek, I guess the old shows and the novels are the ways to go....[/font]

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"](Yes, I'm avoiding work and wasting time! Lol...)[/font]


Edited by benbess, November 30 2013 - 10:43 PM.


#73 of 76 OFFLINE   Jason_V

Jason_V

    Producer



  • 4,962 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001
  • Real Name:Jason
  • LocationBothell, WA

Posted November 30 2013 - 11:01 PM

[font="verdana, geneva, lucida, 'lucida grande', arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:13px;background-color:rgb(230,235,240);"]Fifth, the blowing up of Vulcan, as a consequence, killed the "Prime" universe. In other words, as we all know, none of Next Gen ever happened. Or, it happened in another time line, but that's a distinction without much of a difference from the perspective of New Trek. [/font]

 

Wrong.  I've been having this discussion for the last four years.  The Prime Universe-the one with Picard, Sisko, Janeway and Archer-still exists.  The only thing that has changed is the destruction of Romulus and Spock Prime leaving.  That's it.  It still exists as another timeline. 

 

It happened in another timeline, that part is correct.  Still exists.  As far as we know, Picard is still flying around on the Enterprise, Data is still "dead," Riker and Troi are on the Titan, Sisko is still a god, et al.  The events of Trek 09 happened after Voyager got home (the last thing we see on screen of the 24th century).  Therefore, nothing has changed.  Everything we know about the Prime Universe still applies.



#74 of 76 OFFLINE   benbess

benbess

    Screenwriter



  • 1,890 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 07 2009

Posted November 30 2013 - 11:14 PM

 

....It happened in another timeline, that part is correct....

 

That's the key point to me. If, and it is a big if, they make another Trek television show, it will likely be in the JJA universe. That means that Prime is not still alive quite in the same way to me. I can still watch the Prime shows, or even read a Prime novel, but movie and TV Trek is now in a different universe, which seemingly is more action-based, and imho has a slightly lower IQ.


Edited by benbess, November 30 2013 - 11:15 PM.


#75 of 76 OFFLINE   Jason_V

Jason_V

    Producer



  • 4,962 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001
  • Real Name:Jason
  • LocationBothell, WA

Posted December 01 2013 - 08:43 AM

Sure, chances are anything new on TV will be in the alternate universe, but they always have the option of going back to the Prime universe.  The novels and comics, I think, have some stories still taking place there as well.  It's still there...just a matter of whether we'll see another adventure there or not.



#76 of 76 OFFLINE   Nelson Au

Nelson Au

    Executive Producer



  • 11,678 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 16 1999

Posted December 01 2013 - 09:18 AM

All this alternative timeline discussion has me thinking that Generations took place in an alternative timeline. :). Would be a good reason as any for me to believe Kirk didn't die on that planet at the hands of Soren.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: 3D Blu-ray Reviews, Blu-ray, Paramount

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users