Jump to content

Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

- - - - -

We're the Millers Quick Review

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 of 5 OFFLINE   mattCR


    Executive Producer

  • 10,053 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2005
  • Real Name:Matt
  • LocationOverland Park, KS

Posted August 08 2013 - 04:04 PM

This isn't a comedy where you say: it breaks new ground, it's exceptional, it's different.   But while it doesn't take big risks, and it isn't exceptional, it still made me laugh far more often then I expected to.   There are some decent belly laughs, a few groans, and Anniston/Sudeikis have a pretty solid comic timing between the two.


All I can really ask of a film like this is to make me laugh, and this summer has not had many films that really "worked" in the comedy department.  Heat was "OK", but the laughs were pretty sparse.   And outside of that, I'm struggling to think of any other comedy that just worked.

If you were a fan of "Horrible Bosses", realize this film isn't as good as that film, but there are still some solid laughs.




Ask Me about HTPC! (Threads in HTPC / PMs always responded to)

This signature is povided by MediaBrowser 3 Trakt Plugin: Media Browser 3

#2 of 5 OFFLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson


  • 5,262 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted August 08 2013 - 05:43 PM

I thought "The Heat" was much better than this one!  "Heat" had some very good laughs and was generally entertaining, while "Millers" never went anywhere.


I wanted to like "Millers".  I expected to like "Millers".  I was bored by "Millers".


It seemed curiously pedestrian, like some the Scripto 5000 Automaton wrote it.  Gags felt like they should score but they didn't.  I sensed no chemistry between Sudeikis and Aniston - or among any of the others, either.

Everything felt canned and contrived, as I suspect the writers - or even the Scripto 5000 - knew that they provided an unsupportable premise.  The movie had to work so damned hard to force "the Millers" to stay together that none of it worked.  The characters grow to love each other because the screenplay says so, not because of any clear sense of bonding or affection.  The actors all feel like they just met each other that morning - each scene plays like it's among performers who just said "hello" for the first time.


Sometimes you laugh at movies because you really, really want them to be funny - you find amusement where none actually exists because you wish it to be so.  That trait carried me through the first 30 minutes or so of "Millers", as I wished and hoped and prayed it'd be a riot.

Eventually, I figured out those laughs I so desired would never come.  Instead, I was stuck with a slow, tedious, unfunny, illogical, contrived and predictable comedic vehicle with precious little redeeming value.

Colin Jacobson

#3 of 5 OFFLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson


  • 5,262 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted August 08 2013 - 05:44 PM

Whoops - double post!

Edited by Colin Jacobson, August 08 2013 - 05:44 PM.

Colin Jacobson

#4 of 5 OFFLINE   Patrick Sun

Patrick Sun

    Studio Mogul

  • 37,891 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 30 1999

Posted August 18 2013 - 12:49 PM

The film had a decent setup, but man, oh man, did the rest of the film just go nowhere fast.  Not sure if Jason Sudekis is leading funny man material just yet.  And Jennifer Aniston hasn't picked a good script in years.


There are a few laughs, but there's not much else in the script for the viewer to invest into these characters's plights.


I give it 2 stars or a grade of C.

"Jee-sus, it's like Iwo Jima out there" - Roger Sterling on "Mad Men"
Patcave | 2006 Films | 2007 Films | Flickr | Comic-Con 2012 | Dragon*Con 2012

#5 of 5 OFFLINE   Michael Elliott

Michael Elliott

    Lead Actor

  • 7,155 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 11 2003
  • Real Name:Michael Elliott
  • LocationKY

Posted August 29 2013 - 04:43 PM

Matt is right that this film didn't take any big risks and that's pretty much what kept it from being a real winner.  As it is, the jokes are pretty limited but the ones that work are strong enough to where I'd recommend the film to people.  The "kissing" sequence was certainly the highlight of the picture.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users