Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice in 2016!


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
522 replies to this topic

#1 of 523 OFFLINE   Sean Bryan

Sean Bryan

    Sean Bryan



  • 2,985 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 31 1969
  • Real Name:Sean

Posted July 20 2013 - 01:08 PM

image.jpg http://www.comicbook...s/news/?a=83754

Zack Snyder arrived at Warner Bros.' Hall H panel to a hugely positive reaction from fans, immediately telling them that he was there to confirm a Man of Steel sequel. After teasing fans by saying that there was only one thing he could reveal about follow-up, he brought Henry Lennox out to read something pertaining to the movie. "I want you to remember Clark in all the years to come. In all your private moments. In all the years to come, my hand at your throat. I want you to remember, the one man who beat you." That's right, it's a quote from Frank Miller's The Dark Knight Returns! Snyder would then go on to confirm Superman/Batman, adding that the classic story will inform the movie. Below is the press release in full. BURBANK, CA, July 20, 2013 – On the heels of the worldwide success of “Man of Steel,” director Zack Snyderis bringing together the two greatest Super Heroes of all time—Batman and Superman—for the first time on the big screen. The announcement was made today by Greg Silverman, President, Creative Development and Worldwide Production, and Sue Kroll, President, Worldwide Marketing and International Distribution,Warner Bros. Pictures. The current hit, “Man of Steel,” has taken in more than $630 million at the worldwide box office to date, and climbing. Along with its star, Henry Cavill, the upcomingfilm brings back Amy Adams, Laurence Fishburne and Diane Lane. The new Batman has yet to be cast. Snyder is co-writing the story with David S. Goyer, who will then pen the screenplay. Production is expected to begin in 2014, with an anticipated release date inSummer 2015. Silverman stated, “Zack Snyder is an incredibly talented filmmaker, but beyond that, he’s a fan first and he utterly gets this genre. We could not think of anyone better suited to the task of bringing these iconic Super Heroes to the screen in his own way.” Kroll added, “We are thrilled to be back in business with Zack and his team on this next movie. The success of ‘Man of Steel’ is a wonderful testament to the love and support that both fans and new audiences, worldwide, have for these characters. We are very excited to see what Zack has in store for all of us.”


I don't believe in transcending the genre, I believe IN the genre - Joss Whedon

#2 of 523 OFFLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul



  • 23,074 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted July 20 2013 - 03:21 PM

So they're going to have a Batman that isn't Christian Bale, many people will still mad be that Superman killed a genocidal maniac & didn't bother to save anyone as they were being killed and- just to add one more thing that people can get angry about- they're using the most beloved Batman story in history as a way to inform their story. Call me crazy but I think this movie may have to fight an uphill battle with the internet.



#3 of 523 OFFLINE   Stephen Brooks

Stephen Brooks

    Second Unit



  • 408 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 19 2003
  • Real Name:Stephen
  • LocationBrownsburg, IN

Posted July 20 2013 - 03:33 PM

Making movies is pretty much an uphill battle with the internet, unfortunately. Sent from my SCH-S738C using HTF mobile app
IMPERIAL OFFICER: Lord Vader, I can't find the Central Navigational Network!

VADER (points to control panel): This......is CNN.

#4 of 523 OFFLINE   MishaLauenstein

MishaLauenstein

    Supporting Actor



  • 591 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 04 2002
  • Real Name:Misha Lauenstein
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted July 20 2013 - 07:13 PM

many people will still mad be that Superman killed a genocidal maniac & didn't bother to save anyone

I'm sure Batman will be mad about that too.

So, there's that.


40% Ben Katz + 30% Bobby Hill (Texas) + 20% Monica Geller + 10% William Dent. (Wardrobe by George Costanza)

#5 of 523 OFFLINE   Lou Sytsma

Lou Sytsma

    Producer



  • 5,558 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 01 1998

Posted July 20 2013 - 08:26 PM

So they're going to have a Batman that isn't Christian Bale, many people will still mad be that Superman killed a genocidal maniac & didn't bother to save anyone as they were being killed and- just to add one more thing that people can get angry about- they're using the most beloved Batman story in history as a way to inform their story. Call me crazy but I think this movie may have to fight an uphill battle with the internet.

Yep.

 

As I posted in the Man of Steel thread:

 

A Batman / Superman team up movie now redefines definition of 'bad timing' for both characters given the state of their current respective movie incarnations.

 

A Superman movie that ends with Metropolis flattened and no repercussions and a new Batman that replaces the Nolan one with no setup. 

 
The impression that SDCC leaves me with is that Marvel has a multiyear plan and DC is scrambling to put stuff out.

Every man is my superior, in that I may learn from him.

#6 of 523 OFFLINE   Ejanss

Ejanss

    Screenwriter



  • 2,452 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 23 2012

Posted July 20 2013 - 11:29 PM

Oh, so they're finally going ahead with that overbudget-aborted  project Wolfgang Petersen was going to make fourteen years ago, back when Warner didn't have the faintest idea how to revive either the Superman OR Batman franchise, and were busy digging up old memos and new concepts?

(That was around the same time they'd dug up Tim Burton's old memo for a Catwoman movie, just to show "See, see, we've got ideas for a new Batman movie, we haven't run out of ideas yet!")

 

Warner is legendary for never throwing a studio memo away.  EVER. 

Fifteen years, twenty years, they have project memos lying around that are older than most of the employees, and still "Under consideration"...



#7 of 523 OFFLINE   dpippel

dpippel

    HTF Premium Member



  • 3,426 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2000
  • Real Name:Doug

Posted July 21 2013 - 08:06 AM

Meh.


Careful man, there's a beverage here!


#8 of 523 OFFLINE   Richard--W

Richard--W

    Producer



  • 3,527 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 20 2004

Posted July 21 2013 - 12:17 PM

I'm against it.

 

Whatever Warner Brothers comes up with, I'm against it.

 

The execs at Warner Brothers have their political and social axe to grind, so they grind it on DC Comics.

 

Even the animated features they're doing via Hong Kong sweat-shops are miserable garbage in terms of storytelling.

 

Nothing will change at Warner Brothers. They've been screwing up one franchise after another for over 30 years.

 

Everytime they make a few dollars on opening weekend, they mistake it as a vindication, a justification of their bullshvt.

 

So now they're going to drag Superman and Batman through the mud and their respective guilt trips together.

 

It's so hard to be a superhero, so why bother.

 

The film is going to stink, and the kids will love it.

 

No thanks.



#9 of 523 OFFLINE   FoxyMulder

FoxyMulder

    映画ファン



  • 5,041 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2009
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationScotland

Posted July 21 2013 - 12:35 PM

Christopher Reeve will always be Superman for me, i also liked Michael Keaton and the two Tim Burton Batman films more than the grim ( but entertaining ) Nolan flicks, i loved the dark gothic nature of the Burton Batman films, a lot of thought went into the design of those sets and i'll take Michelle Pfieffers interpretation of Catwoman over Anne Hathaways any day of the week, sexy, seductive and dangerous, miaowwww.

 

A straightforward reboot of Batman is needed, bring back the gothic dark look of the Burton films, for Superman they need to go the other direction, lighter, more hope, more smiles and a hero we can cheer, a hero that does not kill but tries to save, i'm not in favour of a team up, i don't see the point.


     :Fun Movie Quotes:

"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself"   

"Maybe it's a sheep dog... let's keep going" 

"Please doctor, I've got to ask this. It sounds like, well, just as though you're describing some form of super carrot"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


#10 of 523 OFFLINE   Afiger

Afiger

    Agent



  • 43 posts
  • Join Date: May 23 2013
  • Real Name:Daniel

Posted July 21 2013 - 06:51 PM

I'm sure this will tank. Weren't they planning a Justice League anyway? Not a Superman fan to begin, but was pretty disappointed in the movie. Replacing Batman isn't a great movie, but I can imagine Christen Bale's spidey sense kicked in and told him to stay away from this, if they even offered it to him. Another blah superhero movie.



#11 of 523 OFFLINE   Stephen Brooks

Stephen Brooks

    Second Unit



  • 408 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 19 2003
  • Real Name:Stephen
  • LocationBrownsburg, IN

Posted July 21 2013 - 09:38 PM

No way this tanks, even if it sucks. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if it beat Episode VII. Avengers: Age of Ultron will now be fighting for third place in 2015. Sent from my SCH-S738C using HTF mobile app
IMPERIAL OFFICER: Lord Vader, I can't find the Central Navigational Network!

VADER (points to control panel): This......is CNN.

#12 of 523 OFFLINE   mattCR

mattCR

    Executive Producer



  • 10,228 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2005
  • Real Name:Matt
  • LocationOverland Park, KS

Posted July 22 2013 - 05:20 AM

No way this tanks, even if it sucks. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if it beat Episode VII. Avengers: Age of Ultron will now be fighting for third place in 2015.Sent from my SCH-S738C using HTF mobile app

 

Yeah, I don't think so.  Avengers was a billion dollar global franchise.  Superman isn't going to even come close to Iron Man 3 revenues, which look to win the year. 

 

DC is taking two properties, one which was fairly polarizing this summer and another franchise which will have a new character in the lead and mixing them together.  To me, it has a chance of being good.. it also has a chance of being Batman & Robin (1997).

 

Globally, I would expect Star Wars, which has a huge install base, to be a tough one to beat; but remember, Disney owns both those properties.. SW and Avengers.. and the pacing/placement on those will make sure neither screws wth the other, protecting their market value.

 

If it Sucks, the floor is possible.  Meanwhile, Avengers is going to have a multi-year run up with a TV show, movies that continue to do great box office; I don't think Disney is worried about that at all.


trakt.tv

Ask Me about HTPC! (Threads in HTPC / PMs always responded to)

This signature is povided by MediaBrowser 3 Trakt Plugin: Media Browser 3


#13 of 523 OFFLINE   Garry Cowell

Garry Cowell

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 75 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 15 2000

Posted July 22 2013 - 05:35 AM

If they do this ala Star Trek Into Darkness with regards to Frank Miller's The Dark Knight Returns it could be interesting...

 

Personally I'd love Man of Steel 2 to be along the lines of Lex Luthor trying to kill Superman for his part in the mass destruction of Metropolis by recruiting a long retired/thought dead Batman to give him a beat down. Cue: 'Christian Bale' turns up in the final reel (sans any back-story) to deliver a beat down, only to find he's been tricked by Lex Luthor.



#14 of 523 OFFLINE   Freddie Z

Freddie Z

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 93 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 22 2013
  • Real Name:Freddie Zaragoza

Posted July 22 2013 - 05:41 AM

I hated MOS.  Complete lack of heart, soul, and humor.  This team up of Superman and Batman is obviously a desperation act by Warner Bros.  MOS under-achieved both critically and financially so they need Batman to come to the rescue.

 

It's funny how Marvel has all these characters in movies from the X-Men to Spider-Man to The Avengers to the Guardians of the Galaxy.  But Warner seems to know of only two from DC.



#15 of 523 OFFLINE   mattCR

mattCR

    Executive Producer



  • 10,228 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2005
  • Real Name:Matt
  • LocationOverland Park, KS

Posted July 22 2013 - 06:06 AM

I hated MOS.  Complete lack of heart, soul, and humor.  This team up of Superman and Batman is obviously a desperation act by Warner Bros.  MOS under-achieved both critically and financially so they need Batman to come to the rescue.

 

It's funny how Marvel has all these characters in movies from the X-Men to Spider-Man to The Avengers to the Guardians of the Galaxy.  But Warner seems to know of only two from DC.

 

This is what DC has tried:

 

(Domestic/WorldWide)

 

Catwoman - Bomb $40M/$80M

Steel - Bomb $1.7M (No WW)

Jonah Hex - Bomb $10.5M/$10.9M

Green Lantern - not quite a bomb, but not a success, either. $116/$216

Watchmen - not a complete bomb, but close.. despite how fans love it, box office was not good. $107M/$186M

 

Here's interesting.. Batman:

 

Batman (1988) $251M/$441M:  Adjusted for Inflation:  $513M

Batman Returns (1992) $162M/$262M Adjusted: $320M

Batman Mask of the Phantasm: (Animated): $5.7M/$6.2M 

Batman Forever (1995): $182/$336 Adjusted for Inflation: $345M

Batman & Robin $107M/$238M Adjusted for Inflation: $190M

Batman Begins: $206/$374

The Dark Knight: $534/$1B

The Dark Knight Rises: $448/$1B

 

There are some interesting things there... basically, DC sucks when it's not Batman (Superman #s not in here, gotta get to work) butalso the fact that until The Dark Knight, the original Batman (1988) was -easily- the most financially successful  From a toy and licensing standpoint, it still remains far and away the most successfull of the bunch.  I realize people are going to say: look at all the #s sold from Dark Knight/Dark Knight Rises.. but let me ask you: how many Happy Meals were sold for Dark Knight/Dark Knight Rises?  Toys, costumes, etc.?

 

We older collectors still may grab, but nowhere near the volume of that era...

 

I will admit now:  I prefer the 1988 Batman -significantly- over any of the Dark Knight Series. It doesn't mean I think they were bad, I just prefer that film, which played up the comic elements more and was more fun for me, period.


trakt.tv

Ask Me about HTPC! (Threads in HTPC / PMs always responded to)

This signature is povided by MediaBrowser 3 Trakt Plugin: Media Browser 3


#16 of 523 OFFLINE   TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul



  • 23,074 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted July 22 2013 - 08:11 AM

Watchmen - not a complete bomb, but close.. despite how fans love it, box office was not good. $107M/$186M

I don't know how they spent $150 million (or whatever it was) on Watchmen and expected it to turn a profit. It's Watchmen- outside of a comic book store, you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who had ever heard of it before the movie. And then to complicate matters, Snyder stuck fairly close to the source material which is only going to further alienate the audience. I'm glad they spent the money they did and I'm glad that Snyder made it the way that he did but Warners was crazy if they thought that movie was going to turn a profit with a budget that large.


Edited by TravisR, July 22 2013 - 08:14 AM.


#17 of 523 OFFLINE   Cory S.

Cory S.

    Supporting Actor



  • 984 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 07 2004

Posted July 22 2013 - 03:12 PM

Christopher Reeve will always be Superman for me, i also liked Michael Keaton and the two Tim Burton Batman films more than the grim ( but entertaining ) Nolan flicks, i loved the dark gothic nature of the Burton Batman films, a lot of thought went into the design of those sets and i'll take Michelle Pfieffers interpretation of Catwoman over Anne Hathaways any day of the week, sexy, seductive and dangerous, miaowwww.

 

A straightforward reboot of Batman is needed, bring back the gothic dark look of the Burton films, for Superman they need to go the other direction, lighter, more hope, more smiles and a hero we can cheer, a hero that does not kill but tries to save, i'm not in favour of a team up, i don't see the point.

While the team up will happen in the film, this is actually the sequel to Man of Steel.  It just happens to feature Batman, like the Dark Knight featured the Joker. Goyer's been working on the script since February and they're already in pre-production.  And Goyer was on record during Comic-Con saying that this sequel will address the aftermath of Metropolis (which was mostly not done by Superman but that's another conversation) and the issue with Zod and how that affects Kal will be addressed in this film as well.  It just happens to feature Batman.  

 

I think this is a smart move...if the rumor of Flash in 2016 and Justice League in 2017 is true.  There's no need for another Batman origin but Batman and Lex are the perfect characters to question this being that's just revealed himself to the world.

 

I just don't see the negative in this project.  Not even in the slightest.  This is the last geek cultural milestone left.  Age of Ultron is going to make bank but when the two greatest icons of the medium hit the screen for the first time, the sky's the limit.

 

This thing is going to be huge.


"Because he's the hero Gotham deserves.  But, not the one it needs right now.  So, we'll hunt.  Because he can take.  Because, he's not a hero.  He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector.  A DARK KNIGHT."

#18 of 523 OFFLINE   dpippel

dpippel

    HTF Premium Member



  • 3,426 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2000
  • Real Name:Doug

Posted July 22 2013 - 03:57 PM

Yeah, a huge mistake. It's much too early to throw Superman and Batman into a film together IMO, *particularly* in the sequel to Man of Steel. We need to spend more time with THIS Superman before getting distracted by Bruce Wayne showing up in his universe. It's premature, and after seeing Snyder's movie I have very little optimism that pairing them up under his direction will be handled well anyway.

 

Meh.


Careful man, there's a beverage here!


#19 of 523 OFFLINE   Richard--W

Richard--W

    Producer



  • 3,527 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 20 2004

Posted July 22 2013 - 07:26 PM

Personally I don't want to spend another minute with this Superman. I'm not referring to the actor who plays him, I'm referring to the mindset that made Man of Steel. It's not a place I want to go. Zack Snyder and David Goyer are nothing but bad news for Superman.



#20 of 523 OFFLINE   Brandon Conway

Brandon Conway

    captveg



  • 7,566 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 30 2002
  • Real Name:Brandon Conway
  • LocationNorth Hollywood, CA

Posted July 23 2013 - 01:10 AM

I think this is a smart move...if the rumor of Flash in 2016 and Justice League in 2017 is true.  There's no need for another Batman origin but Batman and Lex are the perfect characters to question this being that's just revealed himself to the world.

 

I just don't see the negative in this project.  Not even in the slightest.  This is the last geek cultural milestone left.  Age of Ultron is going to make bank but when the two greatest icons of the medium hit the screen for the first time, the sky's the limit.

 

This thing is going to be huge.

 

Bingo. Like reading my mind.


"And now the reprimand, from an American critic. He reproaches me for using film as a sacred & lasting medium, like a painting or a book. He does not believe that filmmaking is an inferior art, but he believes, and quite rightly, that a reel goes quickly, that the public are looking above all for relaxation, that film is fragile and that it is pretentious to express the power of one's soul by such ephemeral and delicate means, that Charlie Chaplin's or Buster Keaton's first films can only be seen on very rare and badly spoiled prints. I add that the cinema is making daily progress and that eventually films that we consider marvelous today will soon be forgotten because of new dimensions & colour. This is true. But for 4 weeks this film [The Blood of a Poet] has been shown to audiences that have been so attentive, so eager & so warm, that I wonder after all there is not an anonymous public who are looking for more than relaxation in the cinema." - Jean Cocteau, 1932





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users