Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

A few words about...™ House of Cards -- in Blu-ray

A Few Words About

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 of 13 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,922 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted June 12 2013 - 08:23 AM

Shades of the Tushinsky brothers!

 

Viewing Sony's release of Netflix's House of Cards, I kept going back to the aspect ratio, as viewed in projection.

 

I was trying to figure out...

 

"Why?"

 

The only thing that I could come up with, was that possibly Netflix wanted the appearance of Panavision on smaller viewing environments, while not going whole hog with what a number classic filmmakers referred to as an aspect ratio fit for photographing boa constrictors.

 

So our aspect ratio comes out at a nice even 2:1.

 

Shot with a Red Epic in 5k, and taken to a DI, the resultant Blu-ray is a perfect down-rez of what I presume was the filmmakers' intent.

 

Color is never what one might consider to be "normal," whatever that it.  There is always a slight tint of yellow or green or mustard -- of the colors that I recall from my various visits to DC.

 

Shadow detail is, presumably as designed, occasionally limited, with blacks and shadows closing.

 

Flesh tones, again presumably as designed, are never normal.

 

Grain?

 

What grain?

 

As a project, I'm finding House of Cards an interesting, very dark visit to our nations capital, with the best (and usually worst) attributes of politics in play.

 

It's basically a revenge drama, filled with political gamesmanship and intrigue.  Been through only two episodes.  Can't wait to find the time to continue.

 

As an aside, one must get used to Mr. Spacey's occasional breaking of the fourth wall -- something apparently also a part of the original UK series c. 1990-95.  The first words uttered in that fashion immediately took me to "Did you see her steal that fifty pound note?"

 

Recommended.

 

RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#2 of 13 OFFLINE   Richard Gallagher

Richard Gallagher

    Producer



  • 3,298 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 2001
  • Real Name:Rich Gallagher
  • LocationFishkill, NY

Posted June 12 2013 - 08:35 AM

I am working on a full review and I concur with your comments about the shadow detail and the colors. I like Spacey's asides, which in a few words convey his thinking and help to clarify what is happening. I don't believe that I have ever seen anything in the 2.00:1 aspect ratio before!

 

It is a very intriguing show.


Rich Gallagher

#3 of 13 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,922 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted June 12 2013 - 08:38 AM

I am working on a full review and I concur with your comments about the shadow detail and the colors. I like Spacey's asides, which in a few words convey his thinking and help to clarify what is happening. I don't believe that I have ever seen anything in the 2.00:1 aspect ratio before!

 

It is a very intriguing show.

Can't wait to read your further, and far more detailed, comments.

 

RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#4 of 13 OFFLINE   Patrick McCart

Patrick McCart

    Lead Actor



  • 7,483 posts
  • Join Date: May 16 2001
  • Real Name:Patrick McCart
  • LocationAlpharetta, GA, USA

Posted June 12 2013 - 04:32 PM

This is an excellent show and I'm looking forward to the second season. It's dark - not just visually, but rather unforgiving of its characters. I don't think anyone comes out very clean.



#5 of 13 OFFLINE   Kevin EK

Kevin EK

    Screenwriter



  • 2,857 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2003

Posted June 12 2013 - 05:20 PM

I've been told to watch the UK series first.  Has anyone else done so?



#6 of 13 OFFLINE   MLamarre

MLamarre

    Second Unit



  • 423 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 24 2008
  • Real Name:Matthew Lamarre

Posted June 12 2013 - 06:31 PM

The first two episodes were directed by David Fincher. I found the visual style fits right in with the majority of his filmography, The Social Network especially.



#7 of 13 OFFLINE   Christian Preischl

Christian Preischl

    Screenwriter



  • 1,376 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2001

Posted June 13 2013 - 08:12 AM

I don't believe that I have ever seen anything in the 2.00:1 aspect ratio before!

 

 

Maybe Storaro went in and "univisiumed" it. ;)



#8 of 13 OFFLINE   JoshZ

JoshZ

    Second Unit



  • 419 posts
  • Join Date: May 26 2012
  • LocationBoston

Posted June 13 2013 - 11:06 AM

I don't believe that I have ever seen anything in the 2.00:1 aspect ratio before!

 

As Christian mentioned, 2.0:1 is the ratio that Vittorio Storaro chose for his "Univisium" nonsense, when he cropped older scope movies like Apocalpyse Now (on LD and DVD) and The Last Emperor (on Blu-ray, sadly). Storaro claims that he composed the Frank Herbert's Dune miniseries for this ratio, but it was broadcast in 1.78:1.

 

I've also seen 2.0:1 used when filmmakers have "opened up" the mattes from Super 35 productions. The Laserdisc editions of Top Gun, Star Trek VI and the first Austin Powers were like this. (All were later restored to 2.40:1 for Blu-ray).


Writer / Blogmaster

High-Def Digest


#9 of 13 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,922 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted June 13 2013 - 05:57 PM

SuperScope releases were 2:1.RAH

"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#10 of 13 OFFLINE   Yorkshire

Yorkshire

    Screenwriter



  • 1,335 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 22 2009

Posted June 14 2013 - 02:25 AM

As Christian mentioned, 2.0:1 is the ratio that Vittorio Storaro chose for his "Univisium" nonsense, when he cropped older scope movies like Apocalpyse Now (on LD and DVD) and The Last Emperor (on Blu-ray, sadly). Storaro claims that he composed the Frank Herbert's Dune miniseries for this ratio, but it was broadcast in 1.78:1.

 

I've also seen 2.0:1 used when filmmakers have "opened up" the mattes from Super 35 productions. The Laserdisc editions of Top Gun, Star Trek VI and the first Austin Powers were like this. (All were later restored to 2.40:1 for Blu-ray).

 

Josh, I think it's important to distinguish Storaro's proposed Univisium system and his cropping of 'scope films.

 

I don't believe in cropping films from their OAR, but I do think 2.00:1 is a useful ratio in itself for new productions.

 

I seem to remember hearing that much sfx work for Super35 films is done in 2.00:1.

 

BTW, as a point of interest, slightly different but the rather excellent Danish series Borgen was shot on the Red One in the relatively rare (and slightly wider) 2.20:1 ratio.  Well worth hunting down if you like political drama.

 

I've not seen this new House of Cards yet.  In my eyes Spacey can do little wrong, but I have a huge soft spot for the original BBC trilogy (also recently released on Blu-ray Disc - presumably shot on film at the time), and I've been uneasy about a remake.

 

RAH's comments reassure me, but would have done more so if he'd seen the originals.  There's plenty of wall breaking in the original, too.  Is it masterful?  You might think that, but I couldn't possibly comment.

 

Steve W


Edited by Yorkshire, June 14 2013 - 02:27 AM.

Correct a fool and he will hate you, correct a wise man and he will thank you.

#11 of 13 OFFLINE   Moe Dickstein

Moe Dickstein

    Filmmaker



  • 3,200 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2001
  • Real Name:T R Wilkinson
  • LocationWest Hollywood, CA

Posted June 14 2013 - 04:23 PM

I actually like the fact that someone has been "allowed" to make a show for TV in something other than 1.78...
Yes, these strange things happen all the time - PT Anderson, Magnolia

#12 of 13 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,922 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted July 06 2013 - 09:52 AM

A couple of additional thoughts, as I'm nearing the end of the Season One.  What I failed to realize going in, was precisely how Shakespearean House of Cards is in structure and story-line.  As Bill Desowitz notes in his blog here:

 

http://billdesowitz....house-of-cards/

 

it leans heavily on Richard III.

 

And the asides, which break the fourth wall, become very comfortable a few episodes in.

 

RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#13 of 13 OFFLINE   Paul Rossen

Paul Rossen

    Supporting Actor



  • 538 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 09 2004

Posted July 06 2013 - 10:24 AM

Top notch drama.  Spacey and the rest of the cast are tremendous.  I'm up to the 10th chapter and can't wait to find out what happens...Didn't even notice  the AR.







0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users