-

Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

A few words about...™ Panic in the Streets -- in Blu-ray

A Few Words About Fox

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 of 13 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist

  • 7,489 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted April 13 2013 - 06:01 AM

Elia Kazan's 1950 Panic in the Streets is a quality film, with a great cast, and an interesting plague-based story.  I've always been a huge Richard Widmark fan, and in Panic, he does fine work.

 

Bottom line.  It's a film that deserves your attention.

 

Technically, and this has nothing to do with the film's handling by the current team at Fox, but rather goes back to the junking of elements and creation of safety "protection" elements in the mid-1970s -- same old story -- we have some huge problems.

 

To my eye, it appears that a fine grain master was produced -- quickly, and without inspection.  Much of the film is soft focus, with the lower 25% of so of the frame being decidedly out.  This is a pity, as generally, the image, especially black levels, which are important, are quite decent.

 

Is the film worth $20 in it's current state on Blu-ray.  I don't believe so.  However, it still seems to be available via Fox Connect for $45, along with Gentlemen's Agreement, Boomerang and Pinky.  At least one gets some quality for their dollars in that format, along with three other superb films.  For $11, I'd go for it.

 

A superb noir film.

 

Image - 1.5

 

Audio - 4

 

RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#2 of 13 OFFLINE   Yorkshire

Yorkshire

    Screenwriter

  • 1,278 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 22 2009

Posted April 13 2013 - 06:05 AM

From what you've said, is this then the best the film could possibly look, given the elements which remain?

 

And, if that's the case, may I ask the dreaded question?  Does it at least look better than SD DVD?

 

Steve W


Correct a fool and he will hate you, correct a wise man and he will thank you.

#3 of 13 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist

  • 7,489 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted April 13 2013 - 08:58 AM

From what you've said, is this then the best the film could possibly look, given the elements which remain?

 

And, if that's the case, may I ask the dreaded question?  Does it at least look better than SD DVD?

 

Steve W

yes


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#4 of 13 OFFLINE   Keith Cobby

Keith Cobby

    Supporting Actor

  • 870 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 08 2013
  • Real Name:Keith Cobby
  • LocationKent "The Garden of England", UK

Posted April 13 2013 - 09:09 AM

I wonder what the rationale was for releasing this particular film on Blu-ray if the image quality is so poor. There must be other films in the Fox Film Noir range that would produce a better Blu-ray with consequently better sales. People who like this film will surely question whether it is worth upgrading.



#5 of 13 OFFLINE   Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

    Moderator

  • 24,645 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted April 13 2013 - 09:36 AM

I wonder what the rationale was for releasing this particular film on Blu-ray if the image quality is so poor. There must be other films in the Fox Film Noir range that would produce a better Blu-ray with consequently better sales. People who like this film will surely question whether it is worth upgrading.

Because most people won't give this BD as low a grade as RAH.  For the most part, I think many will be quite happy with it.


Crawdaddy

 

Blu-ray Preorder Schedule

 


#6 of 13 ONLINE   ahollis

ahollis

    Producer

  • 5,738 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 01 2007
  • Real Name:Allen
  • LocationNew Orleans

Posted April 13 2013 - 09:58 AM

I have thus Blu and upgraded from the DVD and would not give it that low of a grade. And it is better than the DVD IMHO.

I have speculated that Fox released this title not as Film Noir but as part of the Elia Kazan films collection, which Fox has greatfully been releasing on Blu this year.
"Get a director and a writer and leave them alone. That`s how the best pictures get made" - William "Wild Bill" Wellman


#7 of 13 ONLINE   Rob_Ray

Rob_Ray

    Screenwriter

  • 1,455 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 12 2004
  • Real Name:Rob Ray
  • LocationSouthern California

Posted April 13 2013 - 12:02 PM

I wonder what the rationale was for releasing this particular film on Blu-ray if the image quality is so poor. There must be other films in the Fox Film Noir range that would produce a better Blu-ray with consequently better sales. People who like this film will surely question whether it is worth upgrading.

This title was originally released on Blu-Ray as part of the complete Elia Kazan at Fox Blu-Ray set.  If it had been made by anyone else, it quite probably would have been passed over for something that showed off the format better.



#8 of 13 ONLINE   lark144

lark144

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 118 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 22 2012

Posted April 13 2013 - 01:04 PM

It is most defintely better than the DVD. I do not have a projection system like RAH, so for my 38 inch screen with a four foot distance (I live in a small manhattan apt.) it not only looks fine, but visually and aesthetically it was much easier to understand Kazan's breakthrough, which led to ON THE WATERFRONT. The night for night photography, the extended takes, the use of real locations (such as a mourge) with only one light source, all this and more is in much sharper visual detail on this Blu. Because of this, the film itself is more immersive. As RAH states, this movie is one of the great achievements of post-war noir, and this Blu ray, though far from perfect, brings out the details of that achievement that simply does not comes across on the DVD. On the DVD, you have to stop the disc, look at the image and think about what it means. On this Blu, it's there for you to see. Yes, I wish it was even better, but I'm happy to have it just the same and have already watched the film multiple times.



#9 of 13 OFFLINE   Garysb

Garysb

    Screenwriter

  • 1,429 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 31 2003

Posted April 13 2013 - 01:36 PM

Its currently available at Costco for $12.99 so perhaps that will be an incentive to purchase a less than perfect blu ray. Hello, Dolly is same price and part of the same odd promotion.



#10 of 13 OFFLINE   Mark-P

Mark-P

    Screenwriter

  • 2,316 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 26 2005
  • Real Name:Mark Probst
  • LocationCamas, WA

Posted April 13 2013 - 01:58 PM

I wonder what the rationale was for releasing this particular film on Blu-ray if the image quality is so poor. There must be other films in the Fox Film Noir range that would produce a better Blu-ray with consequently better sales. People who like this film will surely question whether it is worth upgrading.

For me personally, I don't think elements have to be in perfect condition to merit a release on Blu-ray. The advantage of Blu-ray is that it can replicate the look of 35mm film which DVD can't, even if the film elements are poor. I don't mind so much if a film is released on Blu-ray without a million dollar restoration process. Warner Home Video disagrees with me as they will only release Blu-rays of the highest quality and anything that doesn't pass muster, like Red Dust, gets relegated to the Archive.

 

This rationale, by the way, is why I am delighted with many of Olive's releases that so many are pooh-poohing.


Edited by Mark-P, April 13 2013 - 02:04 PM.

  • Robin9 likes this

#11 of 13 OFFLINE   Jacksmyname

Jacksmyname

    Second Unit

  • 298 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 28 2011

Posted April 15 2013 - 05:42 PM

I'm also a big fan of Richard Widmark, and of this film.

It may not be perfect, but it will soon be part of my library.



#12 of 13 ONLINE   rsmithjr

rsmithjr

    Supporting Actor

  • 827 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 22 2011
  • Real Name:Robert Smith
  • LocationPalo Alto, CA

Posted April 15 2013 - 08:39 PM

...

Is the film worth $20 in it's current state on Blu-ray.  I don't believe so.  However, it still seems to be available via Fox Connect for $45, along with Gentlemen's Agreement, Boomerang and Pinky.  At least one gets some quality for their dollars in that format, along with three other superb films.  For $11, I'd go for it.

...

I bought it at Costco for $12.99 yesterday.



#13 of 13 OFFLINE   Yorkshire

Yorkshire

    Screenwriter

  • 1,278 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 22 2009

Posted April 16 2013 - 01:39 AM

yes

 

Many thanks.  I think that probably means I'll buy it when the price drops, or when I have a 'cheap month' (in my dreams that will happen again).

 

Steve W


Correct a fool and he will hate you, correct a wise man and he will thank you.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: A Few Words About, Fox

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users