Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

William Friedkin's Sorcerer is finally headed to Blu-ray!

Warner

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
72 replies to this topic

#1 of 73 Noach Kowalski

Noach Kowalski

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 151 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 10 2013

Posted March 22 2013 - 12:14 PM

William Friedkin's "Sorcerer" -- a film that fell victim to shifting tastes when it opened more than three decades ago -- will be remastered and released in theaters and for the first time on Blu-ray, the director told TheWrap.

The director told TheWrap that a "major studio" has gotten involved in creating a new recolored, digital print and that he hopes it will be ready in time for the Venice Film Festival this August. He said he will have a formal announcement within roughly a week and that the re-release will include all media.

"We’re working off the original negative, which is in pretty good shape, but without changing the original concept we have to bring it back in terms of color saturation, sharpness and all the stuff," he said.

 

http://www.thewrap.c...exclusive-81966

 

Can't freakin wait! I hope they don't screw it up.



#2 of 73 Russell G

Russell G

    Fake Shemp

  • 9,593 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 20 2002
  • Real Name:Russell
  • LocationDeadmonton

Posted March 22 2013 - 12:32 PM

Great news! The vhs copy of a copy I saw was less than desirable, it will be nice to put this on the shelf next to "Wages of Fear".


My wallet cries me to sleep!
 
This post kills threads!


#3 of 73 dpippel

dpippel

    Producer

  • 3,077 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2000
  • Real Name:Doug

Posted March 22 2013 - 12:56 PM

I'm looking forward to this!


Careful man! There's a beverage here!

#4 of 73 Richard V

Richard V

    Screenwriter

  • 1,466 posts
  • Join Date: May 14 2009
  • Real Name:Richard

Posted March 22 2013 - 12:57 PM

Have not seen this film since originally released.  This is certainly Good News!!


See you at the pah-ty, Richter.

#5 of 73 Lord Dalek

Lord Dalek

    Screenwriter

  • 1,961 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 04 2005

Posted March 22 2013 - 01:07 PM

Was hoping for a Criterion of this though.



#6 of 73 Harry-N

Harry-N

    Screenwriter

  • 2,112 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 09 2003
  • Real Name:Harry N.
  • LocationSunny Central Florida

Posted March 22 2013 - 01:48 PM

This is fabulous news and a great way to celebrate the grand re-opening of the Home Theater Forum.

 

I first discovered this movie on an old HBO showing - pan n scan of course, and the stoked my interest in the movie. I later acquired the LaserDisc thinking it was something special in terms of widescreen. The language on that was either misleading or a mistake.

 

In the HDTV age, I had to "upgrade" to the existing Universal DVD which was only slightly better than the LaserDisc - and still pan'n'scan - but at least I could watch it once in awhile without too much angst over the picture quality.

 

Now, in the year that saw two of my other holy grails for upgrade upgraded (THE TAKING OF PELHAM 1..2..3 and FRANTIC), it looks like the other one will also see a big upgrade.

 

Thanks for the news. Report any further news in this thread.

 

Harry


My DVD Collection

A fugitive moves on, through anguished tunnels of time, down dim streets, into dark corners. And each new day offers fear and frustration, tastes of honey and hemlock. But if there is a hazard, there is also hope. - Closing narration to THE FUGITIVE, "Death Is The Door Prize".

#7 of 73 RobHam

RobHam

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 126 posts
  • Join Date: May 25 2012
  • LocationUK

Posted March 22 2013 - 02:44 PM

I have this in the US released pan & scan 4:3 DVD. I reckon it was unfairly machine-gunned by critics when compared to Wages of Fear. Yes, WoF is the better film, but this one also has its merits - not the least of which is the Tangerine Dream soundtrack.

 

Once given favourable reviews for video/audio quality, this is a definite purchase for me.



#8 of 73 Paul Markey

Paul Markey

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 158 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 31 1999
  • Real Name:Paul
  • LocationDublin, Ireland.

Posted March 22 2013 - 02:53 PM

While not without its flaws - too much set-up; that first forty minutes drags like a sumbitch. Something the Clouzot take doesn't suffer - they really don't make them like this anymore. Riveting 70s jungle road nihilism with an electro score, and one of the sweatiest movies ever made. Can't wait to finally see this on the big screen.

#9 of 73 Richard V

Richard V

    Screenwriter

  • 1,466 posts
  • Join Date: May 14 2009
  • Real Name:Richard

Posted March 22 2013 - 03:32 PM

While not without its flaws - too much set-up; that first forty minutes drags like a sumbitch. Something the Clouzot take doesn't suffer - they really don't make them like this anymore. Riveting 70s jungle road nihilism with an electro score, and one of the sweatiest movies ever made. Can't wait to finally see this on the big screen.

Reminds me of the Cheers episode when Cliff and Norm having a debate about the sweatiest movies ever made.  LOL, I think the winner was Cool Hand Luke.


See you at the pah-ty, Richter.

#10 of 73 davidHartzog

davidHartzog

    Second Unit

  • 441 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 17 2004
  • Real Name:David Hartzog
  • Locationupstate NY

Posted March 23 2013 - 10:15 AM

The Wages of Fear remains a great film, an existentialist adventure with a great cast headed by a very effective Yves Montand. Sorcerer was, like Heaven's Gate, was a loser then and remains so, a total waste of time and money and Roy Scheider, only the score is memorable.
Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown.

#11 of 73 Russell G

Russell G

    Fake Shemp

  • 9,593 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 20 2002
  • Real Name:Russell
  • LocationDeadmonton

Posted March 23 2013 - 10:19 AM

The Wages of Fear remains a great film, an existentialist adventure with a great cast headed by a very effective Yves Montand. Sorcerer was, like Heaven's Gate, was a loser then and remains so, a total waste of time and money and Roy Scheider, only the score is memorable.

So you're not going to be into this release? :P

 

I really liked Heavens Gate when it got released by Criterion. I agree that Sorcerer suffers from a slow start, but once it gets going the going is pretty good.


My wallet cries me to sleep!
 
This post kills threads!


#12 of 73 Charles Smith

Charles Smith

    Extremely Talented Member

  • 4,042 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 27 2007
  • LocationNor'east

Posted March 23 2013 - 10:22 AM

Even with whatever flaws it may have, for me this is stupendous news.



#13 of 73 davidHartzog

davidHartzog

    Second Unit

  • 441 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 17 2004
  • Real Name:David Hartzog
  • Locationupstate NY

Posted March 23 2013 - 10:33 AM

No, I'm not going to make this release, with apologies to Jackie Susann, once is sometimes enough. I mean Friedkin missed the whole point of Wages, that character is revealed through action.
Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown.

#14 of 73 Professor Echo

Professor Echo

    Screenwriter

  • 1,485 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 28 2008
  • Real Name:Glen
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted March 23 2013 - 11:24 AM

If only technology could somehow restore Friedkin's original vision and replace Scheider with Steve McQueen.  ;)

 

Still a must buy for me. I don't have any issues with this remake and think both films work as individual entities, each equally masterful within their own skins.



#15 of 73 JoshuaB.

JoshuaB.

    Second Unit

  • 408 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 09 2004
  • Real Name:Joshua
  • LocationCowtown, formerly Vancouver

Posted March 23 2013 - 12:08 PM

I've long hoped to see Sorcerer in its OAR (I admit I bought the full frame DVD, but it was hard to watch), so a blu-ray of a restored version is exciting!! I saw Sorcerer long before Wages of Fear (mostly because I loved Roy Scheider so much in Jaws and sought out all his films, with disappointing results, post-52 Pick Up), so it's my preferred version. Friedkin was one of those 70s filmmakers who stumbled in the 80s (To Live and Die in LA notwithstanding), but Sorceror will always be one of my favourites of his films.

#16 of 73 rsmithjr

rsmithjr

    Supporting Actor

  • 769 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 22 2011
  • Real Name:Robert Smith
  • LocationPalo Alto, CA

Posted March 23 2013 - 01:18 PM

Sorcerer has its differences from Wages, but I like them both, and find Sorcerer to be the more watchable film.

-- I like the setup, it tells us who these people are

-- the road trip is much more harrowing in Sorcerer

-- the various personal, economic political forces at work are more complex and better portrayed.  Wages is more one-dimensional.  It is 50's French socialism compared to 70's post-modernism.



#17 of 73 JoHud

JoHud

    Screenwriter

  • 2,439 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 11 2007
  • Real Name:Joe Hudak

Posted March 25 2013 - 11:21 PM

Remember, last year Friedkin said that he was taking both Universal and Paramount to court over ownership of this film, with a court date for March 2013. 

 

Friedkin said himself he only started the legal battle to settle once and for all who unquestionably owned home video rights and thus get the ball rolling on actually getting a remaster and/or restoration done on the film, as it apparently got muddled shortly after the Universal DVD release.  This news confirms that the plan was a success.

 

Now I'm curious which studio is going to be handling this, as it is almost certainly going to be either Universal or Paramount (WB?).  I'm hoping it is the latter due to their better track record with films of the era.  Universal kind of blew it with The Sting.


Edited by JoHud, March 25 2013 - 11:25 PM.


#18 of 73 AdrianTurner

AdrianTurner

    Second Unit

  • 358 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 05 2007

Posted March 25 2013 - 11:39 PM

I'm a fan of this movie and look forward to a proper release.  Like many people who have already commented, it is fairly slow to get going and in fact looks like a movie made by one of those Cuban or Mexican directors whose main concern was the exploitation of the Third World.  That was pretty amazing for a big budget Hollywood picture.

 

But the major problem with Sorcerer, I feel, is the title itself - it seems as if Friedkin was trying to remind people of The Exorcist, even suggesting they were in for a similar sort of scary ride. I think this was a significant reason why the film flopped so massively.  



#19 of 73 Jon Hertzberg

Jon Hertzberg

    Screenwriter

  • 1,454 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 06 2001
  • Real Name:Jonathan

Posted March 26 2013 - 12:10 PM

Now I'm curious which studio is going to be handling this, as it is almost certainly going to be either Universal or Paramount (WB?). 

 

New studio.



#20 of 73 Moe Dickstein

Moe Dickstein

    Filmmaker

  • 3,127 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2001
  • Real Name:T R Wilkinson
  • LocationSherman Oaks, CA

Posted March 26 2013 - 12:16 PM

Any other news you can share Jon?
Yes, these strange things happen all the time - PT Anderson, Magnolia





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Warner

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users