BEST BOXED SET?">
-Not Logged In-
Jump to content
Posted January 20 2013 - 12:52 AM
Posted January 20 2013 - 07:12 AM
Posted January 20 2013 - 07:16 AM
I would say you are mostly correct with that opinion. However, you can also say that
a considerable amount of thought and positive effort was put into the entire package of
Lawrence of Arabia. This was an elaborate boxed set built from the ground up for its fans.
I have seen sets of this kind that are complete crap. Willy Wonka is a prime example.
At least there are no scented pencils in Lawrence of Arabia.
Posted January 20 2013 - 09:32 AM
Posted January 20 2013 - 03:23 PM
Posted January 21 2013 - 01:32 PM
Posted January 28 2013 - 05:57 AM
Posted March 02 2013 - 12:55 AM
Posted March 02 2013 - 01:46 AM
Posted March 02 2013 - 02:11 AM
Posted March 02 2013 - 02:18 AM
You had one camp that felt they were severely shortchanged with the extras. The other camp felt the box set perfectly suited their needs. Same exact story with Indiana Jones.I'm sure that's the reason and to each their own but when you look at the Hitchcock and Bond sets which have multiple movies with flawed transfers, it's ridiculous for the Indiana Jones set to be in the same category as those sets. Every release could have more but since the Indy set has about 7 hours of extras on it, I can't see whining about it. That being said, everyone has their own criteria and they can vote however they want.
Posted March 02 2013 - 02:41 AM
Posted March 02 2013 - 04:11 AM
Posted March 02 2013 - 04:41 AM
That's the trouble with asking for other people's opinions, they don't always agree with me.LOL. That is such a true statement for many of us!
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users