Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo

Another doom and gloom prediction....3-D


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
149 replies to this topic

#141 of 150 OFFLINE   RolandL

RolandL

    Screenwriter



  • 2,773 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 11 2001
  • LocationCromwell, CT

Posted July 11 2013 - 11:36 AM

I must have over 40 3-D titles that I purchased for $6 to $19.99 each. Although I'm starting to wait to see if they are on the HBO or STARZ free on demand 3D list before I purchase.


Roland Lataille
Cinerama web site

 


#142 of 150 OFFLINE   Yorkshire

Yorkshire

    Screenwriter



  • 1,335 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 22 2009

Posted July 12 2013 - 03:16 AM

SKY remain committed to 3D and see a growth in take up:

 

http://www.hdtvtest....01307113175.htm

 

Sky is interesting.

 

In the UK they've been pretty much at the forefront of TV technology - widescreen, digital, interactive, 3D, and so on.

 

Reading between the lines, even their figures on uptake aren't brilliant.  But they appear to be saying that they think the public will respond more positively when glasses-free 3D arrives.

 

I'm not convinced we're going to get that any time soon, and even if we do I can already see it being less than perfect.  The problems we're seeing with convergence, ghosting, etc with just two images is already a problem - I can't even begin to imagine what it'll look like with multiple viewers from different angles, potentially moving about.

 

I think Sky probably believe that staying with current 3D will give them a big start over the BBC when glasses-free eventually arrives.

 

In a country of 30 million+ households, 500,000 isn't an awful lot.

 

Steve W


Correct a fool and he will hate you, correct a wise man and he will thank you.

#143 of 150 OFFLINE   Johnny Angell

Johnny Angell

    Played With Dinosaurs Member



  • 5,621 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 13 1998
  • Real Name:Johnny Angell
  • LocationCentral Arkansas

Posted July 12 2013 - 10:10 AM

Me too.  Sales almost exclusively.  $20 has been my magic price point with the occasional exception.  I've paid $15 several times for a 3D title.  I did pay $25 plus (I think) for Avatar, but that was...well...that was Avatar.


Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that have succeeded but not replaced one another.--Irving Townsend


#144 of 150 OFFLINE   Johnny Angell

Johnny Angell

    Played With Dinosaurs Member



  • 5,621 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 13 1998
  • Real Name:Johnny Angell
  • LocationCentral Arkansas

Posted July 12 2013 - 10:15 AM

Glasses free 3D reminds me of a demo I saw on broadcast tv that must be more than 20 years ago.  There were no HD TVs, no LEDs, just a standard 4x3 TV.  It was a news article about a new technology.  They showed about a 20 second or less clip and it worked.  It was like looking through a window and there was real depth.  No special equipment, this was coming in over a standard broadcast signal.

 

However the picture pulsated.  To watch a 1/2 hour program would have been migraine inducing.  It was a demo of a technology and I never heard about it again.


Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that have succeeded but not replaced one another.--Irving Townsend


#145 of 150 OFFLINE   FoxyMulder

FoxyMulder

    映画ファン



  • 5,076 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2009
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationScotland

Posted July 12 2013 - 10:40 AM

Toshiba have a 55 inch 3D LCD ( LED backlit ) TV selling for £2999, it does not require glasses, it's resolution is 3840 x 2160, higher than 1080p, cheap for such a high resolution and glasses free tech, unfortunately reviews all mention that you need to watch in a pretty tight viewing angle and not move your head while viewing 3D, not a problem for me as it's wise not to move your head while watching with active shutter glasses too, there seems to be other issues too, perhaps they will iron them all out in the next five years or so. 

 

http://www.cnet.com/...-not-very-well/

 

http://www.trustedre...3d-tv_TV_review

 

The price above says £6999, at John Lewis it says £2999, same TV...? Looks like it to me, the B just stands for UK model, of course the fact it's 4K is pointless because it cannot playback 4K native content, what a mistake by Toshiba.

 

http://www.johnlewis...w-hd/p231549250


Edited by FoxyMulder, July 12 2013 - 10:49 AM.

     :Fun Movie Quotes:

"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself"   

"Maybe it's a sheep dog... let's keep going" 

"Please doctor, I've got to ask this. It sounds like, well, just as though you're describing some form of super carrot"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


#146 of 150 OFFLINE   RolandL

RolandL

    Screenwriter



  • 2,773 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 11 2001
  • LocationCromwell, CT

Posted July 12 2013 - 11:13 AM

I don't think there will be a large market for glasses free 3-D TV's. I have seen them recently and the 3-D does not work as you move around and there is nothing come out of the screen. The people that will be looking for only depth 3-D and no glasses is very small.


Roland Lataille
Cinerama web site

 


#147 of 150 OFFLINE   FoxyMulder

FoxyMulder

    映画ファン



  • 5,076 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2009
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationScotland

Posted July 12 2013 - 11:29 AM

I don't think there will be a large market for glasses free 3-D TV's. I have seen them recently and the 3-D does not work as you move around and there is nothing come out of the screen. The people that will be looking for only depth 3-D and no glasses is very small.

 

They need to find a way to get 3D popout without glasses, not sure that's possible but they need to find a way.


     :Fun Movie Quotes:

"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself"   

"Maybe it's a sheep dog... let's keep going" 

"Please doctor, I've got to ask this. It sounds like, well, just as though you're describing some form of super carrot"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


#148 of 150 OFFLINE   Ejanss

Ejanss

    Screenwriter



  • 2,452 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 23 2012

Posted July 12 2013 - 12:58 PM

I don't think there will be a large market for glasses free 3-D TV's. I have seen them recently and the 3-D does not work as you move around and there is nothing come out of the screen. The people that will be looking for only depth 3-D and no glasses is very small.

 

I remember haters originally sniggering "3DTV...Is that going to look like those lenticular waterfall pictures you see on the wall at cheap Chinese restaurants?  :lol:  "

 

No--THAT would be glasses-free TV.


Edited by Ejanss, July 12 2013 - 11:14 PM.


#149 of 150 OFFLINE   Towergrove

Towergrove

    Supporting Actor



  • 996 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 07 2011

Posted August 02 2013 - 01:23 PM

I remember haters originally sniggering "3DTV...Is that going to look like those lenticular waterfall pictures you see on the wall at cheap Chinese restaurants?  :lol:  "

 

No--THAT would be glasses-free TV.

 

I find it Interesting that many on internet message boards that say they hate 3D because of the heavy uncomfortable 3D glasses laud Google Glass, which is much heavier and uncomfortable to the face and praise it as if its the second coming. :3dglasses:


"Fasten your seatbelts - it's going to be a bumpy night."
 

 


#150 of 150 OFFLINE   FoxyMulder

FoxyMulder

    映画ファン



  • 5,076 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2009
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationScotland

Posted August 02 2013 - 01:37 PM

I find it Interesting that many on internet message boards that say they hate 3D because of the heavy uncomfortable 3D glasses laud Google Glass, which is much heavier and uncomfortable to the face and praise it as if its the second coming. :3dglasses:

 

I love 3D and have to wear the glasses over my prescription short sighted ones.


     :Fun Movie Quotes:

"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself"   

"Maybe it's a sheep dog... let's keep going" 

"Please doctor, I've got to ask this. It sounds like, well, just as though you're describing some form of super carrot"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users