Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.


Photo
- - - - -

While we wait for A few words about...™ Cloud Atlas -- in Blu-ray

A Few Words About

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

#21 of 37 OFFLINE   Michel_Hafner

Michel_Hafner

    Supporting Actor



  • 851 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 28 2002

Posted December 13 2012 - 09:13 AM

I'm looking forward to seeing it again on BD. It was a bit long in the cinema. Watching it again maybe it feels shorter since the connections become clearer and the music has sunk in better. If you like the film and have never seen the one in my "avatar", which is a shorter precursor, then watch that one too.

#22 of 37 OFFLINE   Steve Tannehill

Steve Tannehill

    Producer



  • 5,550 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 06 1997
  • Real Name:Steve Tannehill
  • LocationDFW

Posted April 24 2013 - 07:04 PM

The blu-ray and DVD release date slipped to May 14th, to allow for a European release.

 

The digital release (iTunes, Amazon, Vudu) will be April 30th.  I have it preordered, I can't wait the two weeks to see the blu-ray, which I have also ordered.



#23 of 37 OFFLINE   Steve Tannehill

Steve Tannehill

    Producer



  • 5,550 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 06 1997
  • Real Name:Steve Tannehill
  • LocationDFW

Posted May 02 2013 - 06:13 PM

I have watched the iTunes digital copy of the movie twice, now, and it holds up very well.



#24 of 37 OFFLINE   Dick

Dick

    Producer



  • 4,515 posts
  • Join Date: May 22 1999
  • Real Name:Rick

Posted May 02 2013 - 06:45 PM

Had me pulling up film titles as I watched, seeing comparisons / parallels. Adrian Messenger, Bladerunner, Tron, Soylent Green, et al

Wow, that's a pretty eclectic group of films that you thought of after viewing CLOUD ATLAS, which I have not yet seen. I am intrigued as to how all of those titles correlate to this one. Look forward to the Blu.



#25 of 37 OFFLINE   JoshZ

JoshZ

    Second Unit



  • 419 posts
  • Join Date: May 26 2012
  • LocationBoston

Posted May 06 2013 - 06:54 AM

Wow, that's a pretty eclectic group of films that you thought of after viewing CLOUD ATLAS, which I have not yet seen. I am intrigued as to how all of those titles correlate to this one. Look forward to the Blu.

 

Half of those movies are name-checked in Cloud Atlas, which actually has a character quote the most famous dialogue from one of them.


Writer / Blogmaster

High-Def Digest


#26 of 37 ONLINE   Tino

Tino

    Producer



  • 6,096 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999
  • Real Name:Valentino
  • LocationMetro NYC

Posted May 14 2013 - 02:07 PM

Half of those movies are name-checked in Cloud Atlas, which actually has a character quote the most famous dialogue from one of them.

And that line had me laughing out loud for a good minuteStill digesting..............
It's gonna be a hell of a ride. I'm ready. .

#27 of 37 OFFLINE   Cameron Yee

Cameron Yee

    Executive Producer



  • 10,852 posts
  • Join Date: May 09 2002
  • Real Name:Cameron Yee
  • LocationSince 2006

Posted May 14 2013 - 02:12 PM

Half of those movies are name-checked in Cloud Atlas, which actually has a character quote the most famous dialogue from one of them.

 

And then followed up with more than just a famous line

Spoiler



#28 of 37 OFFLINE   JoshZ

JoshZ

    Second Unit



  • 419 posts
  • Join Date: May 26 2012
  • LocationBoston

Posted May 15 2013 - 06:55 AM

And then followed up with more than just a famous line

Spoiler

 

One of the themes I found interesting about the movie is that:

 

Spoiler


Writer / Blogmaster

High-Def Digest


#29 of 37 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,995 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted May 18 2013 - 06:57 AM

As the new Blu-ray from WB is now available, a few more words are in order.

 

It appears that Cloud Atlas is a film-based production, 35/3, taken through a 2k DI.  One of the things that's quite instructive to the novice viewer, especially in projection, is how much of a difference a DI, whether film or data based has on the final product.

 

One of the first places to look is the main title sequence.  For decades main titles, unless a simple graphic, were dupes, and without high quality duping stock, the final results were generally less than stellar.

 

Take a look at the main title sequence even from a '60s production such as The Great Escape, and you'll see what I mean.  The main titles may have originally looked a bit better, but we're probably now looking at something of sep masters, which means fifth generation.  With digital clean-up this can look quite nice, but it's going to be soft -- very soft.

 

Compare that to a digitally produced set of main titles, a perfect example being Cloud Atlas, and you'll see that they're original, brilliantly sharp and perfect, with no generational loss.

 

Cloud Atlas may be an acquired taste.  It's certainly no ordinary film.  But to those who haven't yet sampled what it offers, I'm suggesting highly that you do so.

 

RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#30 of 37 OFFLINE   Colin Jacobson

Colin Jacobson

    Producer



  • 5,405 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000

Posted May 18 2013 - 05:09 PM

Dunno if anyone else will agree, but I thought "Cloud Atlas" offered possibly the most attractive live-action BD I've ever seen.  Simply stunning visual quality...


Edited by Colin Jacobson, May 18 2013 - 05:10 PM.

Colin Jacobson
http://www.dvdmg.com

#31 of 37 OFFLINE   Dick

Dick

    Producer



  • 4,515 posts
  • Join Date: May 22 1999
  • Real Name:Rick

Posted May 19 2013 - 11:18 AM

I haven't read the book. Regarding the movie, reviews here and elsewhere indicate that people are puzzling about the "meaning" of it. I think this is a film that "means" something different to each viewer, which is fine. For me, the film contained a message that each of us is responsible for everyone else, and that our individual actions impact those in the present and in the future. For me, there are cautionary points about the need for power and control over others - whether through religion, politics or social & economic status, and about the suffering of the others as a result. It seems a potent message and rather well communicated here. I like this film a lot



#32 of 37 OFFLINE   bryan4999

bryan4999

    Supporting Actor



  • 545 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 07 2012
  • Real Name:Bryan Forbes

Posted May 19 2013 - 03:50 PM

I watched this blu-ray last night and loved the movie, which I missed in the theater. I am looking forward to finding the time to watch it again after I have absorbed it for a few days. It was a beautiful film to look at, so many vivid colors, which is a nice change since the style seems to have gone to a de-saturated, monochromatic look in so many new movies. I found it helpful to turn the captions on, it made it a bit easier to follow, given the brisk pace of most of the dialogue. 



#33 of 37 OFFLINE   Brian McP

Brian McP

    Second Unit



  • 450 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 29 2007

Posted May 19 2013 - 10:20 PM

I have a sneaking suspicion that like "Blade Runner", Warner Bros will make a ton of money off this picture in home video....it will end up going back into theatres as late shows....it will become a cult movie....and we'll all (hopefully) be buying the '25th Anniversary' box set with 5 discs (or virtual reality versions of the movie -- whatever's going in 2037....)



#34 of 37 OFFLINE   Reggie W

Reggie W

    Screenwriter



  • 1,184 posts
  • Join Date: May 31 2004
  • Real Name:Gregory Arkadin
  • LocationPallookaville, USA

Posted May 20 2013 - 07:24 AM

I watched it over the weekend and will comment more on it later but I think the big issue many people will have with this film is how it quickly jumps from story to story giving some people trouble following all the different threads. 

 

Personally, I liked that device in the film and for me it made things feel that much more interconnected which is one of the themes of the picture. I have never read the novel nor did I have any knowledge of what the film was about going in but I was able to follow the flow of it without an issue. 

 

A lot of what happens is bang on (meaning pretty simple to catch) and things like "as one door closes another door opens" are reinforced with dialogue and visuals to create a flow that tells us how these people in different periods of history have influenced or created ripples that continue to have an effect on other people. 

 

Early in the film there is an important bit of dialogue about how if God or a divine being created the world how much of it are we able to change and what is basically fate...or divine providence and unchangeable...and then throughout the film we watch people that do their best to change or control what happens often willing to sacrifice themselves for others...throwing out Spock's old Star Trek bone of "the needs of the many outweighing the needs of the few or the one."

 

It is a very ambitious film and for that I sort of think that ambition should be rewarded but I can see how some people will have an issue with this film. It is an event film no question about that and it is an attempt to make an epic. 

 

One thing I will say is that Tom Hanks really chews the scenery here and is pretty over the top in most of the roles he plays. I can see why they cast him but I do think they may have been better off going with somebody other than Hanks. I'm not saying he is bad in the film but he certainly provides enough ham to make a lot of sandwiches. 



#35 of 37 OFFLINE   Moe Dickstein

Moe Dickstein

    Filmmaker



  • 3,239 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2001
  • Real Name:T R Wilkinson
  • LocationWest Hollywood, CA

Posted May 20 2013 - 08:08 AM

I doubt the movie would have been funded without Hanks.
Yes, these strange things happen all the time - PT Anderson, Magnolia

#36 of 37 OFFLINE   RobHam

RobHam

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 126 posts
  • Join Date: May 25 2012
  • LocationUK

Posted July 04 2013 - 02:43 PM

I'm late the party with this one.

 

Cloud Atlas was given a very limited cinema release in the UK, and I didn't get to see it. The BD was finally released on Monday and I watched it earlier today. 

 

If ever there was a movie-buff's film, then this is it - it references loads of different films, some obliquely and some directly (Soylent Green, and Blade Runner amongst them). I thought the writing was of a high standard for the majority of it with perhaps some lapses when it attempted comedy. It took a good hour before I started to "get" the nature of the overlapping stories, and by the end I was totally immersed in the film.

 

The visuals are amongst the best I've seen on Blu-ray - jaw-dropping at times. 

 

This is one I'll re-watch fairly soon to better appreciate the story, and to be swept away again by epic film-making at its grandest. 

 

What I don't understand is, having spent >£100M on this movie, why was it apparently abandoned at the marketing stage by the studio? 



#37 of 37 OFFLINE   Moe Dickstein

Moe Dickstein

    Filmmaker



  • 3,239 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 06 2001
  • Real Name:T R Wilkinson
  • LocationWest Hollywood, CA

Posted July 04 2013 - 06:34 PM

It was independently financed. Warner Bros just distributed it in the US

Edited by Moe Dickstein, July 04 2013 - 06:34 PM.

Yes, these strange things happen all the time - PT Anderson, Magnolia





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users