Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

A few words about...™ Patton (take two) -- in Blu-Ray

A Few Words About

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
48 replies to this topic

#21 of 49 haineshisway

haineshisway

    Screenwriter

  • 1,996 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 26 2011
  • Real Name:Bruce
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted November 20 2012 - 11:10 AM

This incessant scouring the image for grain is so antiproductive to watching a motion picture, especially one from a 65mm element in which you should not see much grain, if any, at all. It was the point of shooting in that format - the least amount of grain for the sharpest and most clear image. It's a gorgeous transfer, IMO, and looks very much like the film looked back in the day - terrific. You can never replicate the 65mm experience at home, but, for me, it's a beauty. The detail and clarity are breathtaking at times.

#22 of 49 Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist

  • 7,308 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted November 20 2012 - 01:11 PM

This incessant scouring the image for grain is so antiproductive to watching a motion picture, especially one from a 65mm element in which you should not see much grain, if any, at all. It was the point of shooting in that format - the least amount of grain for the sharpest and most clear image. It's a gorgeous transfer, IMO, and looks very much like the film looked back in the day - terrific. You can never replicate the 65mm experience at home, but, for me, it's a beauty. The detail and clarity are breathtaking at times.

What some readers may not realize, is that Patton was two full generations newer than Lawrence, when it came to film stocks. While Lawrence was shot on Eastman 5250, Patton was 5254, a far more modern stock, with a finer grain pattern. RAH

"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#23 of 49 Dick

Dick

    Producer

  • 3,905 posts
  • Join Date: May 22 1999
  • Real Name:Rick

Posted November 21 2012 - 02:50 AM

This incessant scouring the image for grain is so antiproductive to watching a motion picture, especially one from a 65mm element in which you should not see much grain, if any, at all. It was the point of shooting in that format - the least amount of grain for the sharpest and most clear image. It's a gorgeous transfer, IMO, and looks very much like the film looked back in the day - terrific. You can never replicate the 65mm experience at home, but, for me, it's a beauty. The detail and clarity are breathtaking at times.

Sir: I was merely trying to establish whether or not I had the correct edition. I did not mean to suggest I did not like how it appeared. I think it looks very nice.

#24 of 49 Oblivion138

Oblivion138

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 121 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 13 2012

Posted November 22 2012 - 10:14 PM

I'm sure you've got the right edition. If it looks "very nice," it's the remastered release. The original release looked dreadful...at least to my eye. While screenshots only tell a part of the story with any transfer, it would be foolish to discount the part of the story they do tell. And if ever there was a telling comparison: http://caps-a-holic....sless=1#auswahl

#25 of 49 John Stockton

John Stockton

    Second Unit

  • 364 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 09 2000

Posted November 27 2012 - 05:21 PM

I have the original disc from the first pressing, unopened. So no exchange program from Fox regarding this release??

#26 of 49 Robert Crawford

Robert Crawford

    Moderator

  • 23,930 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 1998
  • Real Name:Robert
  • LocationMichigan

Posted November 27 2012 - 09:27 PM

Originally Posted by John Stockton 

I have the original disc from the first pressing, unopened. So no exchange program from Fox regarding this release??

There is no exchange program!







Crawdaddy


Crawdaddy

 

Blu-ray Preorder Schedule

 


#27 of 49 Dave H

Dave H

    Producer

  • 5,217 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2000

Posted January 17 2013 - 02:32 PM

I watched this tonight and it looked very good. However, it still contained some edge enhancement or ringing.

#28 of 49 OliverK

OliverK

    Screenwriter

  • 1,504 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 01 2000

Posted January 18 2013 - 03:30 AM

I watched this tonight and it looked very good. However, it still contained some edge enhancement or ringing.

Not all outlines are from edge enhancement, some are optical effects amplified by EE. Looking very good indeed and I appreciate it that Fox revisited Patton, other titles that are less than stellar did not get a makeover.

#29 of 49 Dave H

Dave H

    Producer

  • 5,217 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2000

Posted January 18 2013 - 04:00 AM

Not all outlines are from edge enhancement, some are optical effects amplified by EE. Looking very good indeed and I appreciate it that Fox revisited Patton, other titles that are less than stellar did not get a makeover.

How do you determine the difference between an optical defect and EE?

#30 of 49 OliverK

OliverK

    Screenwriter

  • 1,504 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 01 2000

Posted January 18 2013 - 05:06 AM

How do you determine the difference between an optical defect and EE?

A good indicator is that the "ringing" looks more like a diffuse "aura" and and tapering off in intensity: http://www.caps-a-ho...y=235#vergleich I would not call it a defect by the way, you can also see it in film prints, first noticed that in a screening of a 70mm print of Lawrence of Arabia and then The Last Valley and most obvious in both intensity and frequency in Krakatoa East of Java, all 70mm prints. I would guess that what normally happens is that movies get sharpened to some degree on their way to Blu-Ray and these optical effects get to be a bit more prominent. Here is an example of classic EE: Look at the Metal above the windshield which has a nice and even halo between it and the sky: http://www.blu-ray.c...414&position=17 No tapering and even intensity plus the reduced detail is a good giveaway that EE was used to give the image some pop, both the lesser WB UP70 releases (Mutiny on the Bounty and Battle of the Bulge) have rather mediocre detail and they also have a filtered look for whatever reason and Warner apparently decided to give BoB a little "help" - with not so pleasing results imo.

#31 of 49 Dave H

Dave H

    Producer

  • 5,217 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 13 2000

Posted January 18 2013 - 05:44 AM

Thanks, those images are good examples.

#32 of 49 Ed Lachmann

Ed Lachmann

    Supporting Actor

  • 513 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 17 2011

Posted January 18 2013 - 06:12 AM

Would Universal PLEASE break down and finally do this for SPARTACUS? Even the early "bad" PATTON BD looked fabulous compared to the ugly stinking mess our beloved gladiator's been scandalously relegated to.

#33 of 49 OliverK

OliverK

    Screenwriter

  • 1,504 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 01 2000

Posted January 19 2013 - 12:19 AM

Spartacus would also be near the top of my list and number one when it comes to titles held by a major studio. Seeing how Universal has treated the large format Hitchcock movies I would rather want to wait a little more though before they really know what they are doing - next time Spartacus better be REALLY good and not just OK like Vertigo.

#34 of 49 dana martin

dana martin

    Screenwriter

  • 1,822 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 28 2003
  • Real Name:Dana Martin
  • LocationNorfolk, VA

Posted January 19 2013 - 03:14 AM

Concerning a reissue of Spartacus from Universal, I don’t know if that will happen, they were fine to include it in the WB Kubrick set, but the saving grace is that Universal has their agreement with Criterion, how long after Fear and Loathing, Brazil, Traffic, or Dazed and Confused get their Criterion release on Blu, that would be the best possible chance to see this done correctly, and I for one am hoping that announcement happens this year.  


Playing at the Drive In

Quote:Welles, Kubrick, Hitchcock, Spielberg, Jackson, Wood ?? a true Auteur should be one who follows his artistic vision
 

 


#35 of 49 OliverK

OliverK

    Screenwriter

  • 1,504 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 01 2000

Posted January 19 2013 - 03:27 AM

Concerning a reissue of Spartacus from Universal, I don’t know if that will happen, they were fine to include it in the WB Kubrick set, but the saving grace is that Universal has their agreement with Criterion, how long after Fear and Loathing, Brazil, Traffic, or Dazed and Confused get their Criterion release on Blu, that would be the best possible chance to see this done correctly, and I for one am hoping that announcement happens this year.  

It is higly unlikely that Criterion would pay their way here and why should they? This movie belongs to Universal and they will reap the benefits of it being redone properly all over the world and for a very long time IF they do it. Personally and with the current state of affairs I would rather see them selling it to another studio that knows how to treat its classics right but that obviously is wishful thinking.

#36 of 49 Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist

  • 7,308 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted January 19 2013 - 03:49 AM

Originally Posted by OliverK 


It is higly unlikely that Criterion would pay their way here and why should they? This movie belongs to Universal and they will reap the benefits of it being redone properly all over the world and for a very long time IF they do it. Personally and with the current state of affairs I would rather see them selling it to another studio that knows how to treat its classics right but that obviously is wishful thinking.


Agreed.


RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#37 of 49 MarkA

MarkA

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 150 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 23 1999

Posted April 30 2013 - 12:59 PM

I bought the remastered Patton a few months ago, but today I bought a 4 Blu-ray combo pack of: Patton, The Longest Day, The Sand Pebbles, and Tora! Tora! Tora!

Does anyone know if it is the remastered version of Patton in this release?  I called the 800 number on the back of the Blu-ray but they said they don't have this information.

Thanks much.



#38 of 49 Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist

  • 7,308 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted April 30 2013 - 01:07 PM

I bought the remastered Patton a few months ago, but today I bought a 4 Blu-ray combo pack of: Patton, The Longest Day, The Sand Pebbles, and Tora! Tora! Tora!

Does anyone know if it is the remastered version of Patton in this release?  I called the 800 number on the back of the Blu-ray but they said they don't have this information.

Thanks much.

Best to return.  Longest Day is unwatchable.

 

RAH


  • FoxyMulder likes this

"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#39 of 49 MarkA

MarkA

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 150 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 23 1999

Posted April 30 2013 - 01:22 PM

Thanks Robert, I had no idea.



#40 of 49 Charles Smith

Charles Smith

    Extremely Talented Member

  • 4,045 posts
  • Join Date: Jun 27 2007
  • LocationNor'east

Posted April 30 2013 - 01:56 PM

I wouldn't suspect it for one minute of being the new one in a pack like that.  (It would have to blatantly say it is.)







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: A Few Words About

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users