Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

which to use? tv or avr


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 of 4 rwrod

rwrod

    Auditioning

  • 1 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 05 2012

Posted October 05 2012 - 01:32 PM

Hello. I just had a 92 inch MIT deliver. First big screen in 10yrs to replace a 65 inch. The guy who set it up said to use the tv as the switch to change between inputs. Said it was better and less signal loss. To just use the AVR for sound only. On my old system I use the AVR to switch. Which is better?

#2 of 4 schan1269

schan1269

    HTF Expert

  • 12,865 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 04 2012
  • Real Name:Sam
  • LocationChicago-ish/NW Indiana

Posted October 05 2012 - 02:37 PM

That guy is an idiot. You can use the TV for your switch if you are happy with everything being in 2.0 and you like DPL and don't care to ever use DD, DTS, DTS HD-MA or Dolby True HD. (probably missed a few)

#3 of 4 gene c

gene c

    Producer

  • 5,675 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 05 2003
  • Real Name:Gene
  • LocationBay area, Ca

Posted October 05 2012 - 02:54 PM

There's nothing wrong with using the display to switch the video, but having the receiver do it while it's also switching the audio is much easier. I think it's been proven that running the video through current avr's doesn't effect the video quality one bit. If you have an older pre-hdmi receiver and a bluray player then it might be better to run the video from the BR player straight to the display with hdmi. Otherwise, plug everything into the receiver and let the avr (audio/video receiver :) ) do it. HDMI is better for video then component.
"Everyday room": Panasonic 58" Plasma, Dish HD DVR, Pioneer Elite vsx-23, BDP-23 BR, dv58avi universal dvd player, Paradigm Studio 20 V1, CC-450, Dayton HSU-10 subwoofer.

"Movie/Music room": Toshiba 65" DLP, Dish HD receiver, Marantz 7005, CC-4003, BD-7006, Polk LSI25's-LSi7's-LSiC, 2 original Dayton 10" "Mighty-Mites" subwoofers. (subject to change without notice).
 
Also have  MB Quart Vera VS05 +.....too much to list. Help me.
 
 

 


#4 of 4 Type A

Type A

    Supporting Actor

  • 794 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 07 2007
  • Real Name:Ty
  • LocationPortland Oregon

Posted October 06 2012 - 05:15 AM

Remember its not just about switching, its about processing also. It depends on your video processor and implementation in your gear on which will give you the best performance. My Sherwood AVR has the highly-touted REON video processor but the implementation seems poor as using it seems to lower my picture quality (and yeah Ive tweaked it for hours). So I use bypass in the AVR and let either the source or projector do the processing. While you might want to use your AVR as a switcher you might NOT want to use it as a video processor and depending on your AVR there may not be a way to bypass a mediocre video processor. I would check both ways and see if it makes a diff in PQ before deciding.
JVC DLA-RS60U3D & DaLite High Power 106"
Paradigm Studio V.5 20 (5) & ADP590 (2)  
Hsu VTF-2 MK3 (2) & MBM-12 MK2 (2)

Yamaha RX-A3010 & Emotiva XPA5
Oppo BDP93 & Darbee DVP 5000

*My Home Theater Photo Journal*




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users