Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

A few words about...™ Cover Girl -- in Blu-ray

A Few Words About

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
26 replies to this topic

#1 of 27 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,609 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted July 10 2012 - 06:18 AM

Charles Vidor's 1944 Technicolor musical Cover Girl, from Columbia, is high on many "best" lists when it comes to American musical films.


It's hard to beat Rita Hayworth, Gene Kelly, Phil Silvers, , and the musical talents of Jerome Kern and Ira Gershwin.


Make no mistake, Cover Girl was gorgeous Technicolor.


At least in 1944.


I'm not certain what is being gained with this Blu-ray release, as resolution is far below standards, with contrast blooming, and blacks taking precedence over the normal Technicolor spectrum of colors.


The problem appears to be Eastman color intervention.  Probably going from either the original negatives or masters years ago to Eastman safety color stock, and the work was simply not performed well.


Either that, and I've not asked, the loss of both the original negatives as well as protection masters.


Bottom line, Cover is a film beloved by many, which in this particular incarnation, fails to appear like the original in any way.


"Better to have left him."


Image - 2


Audio - 3


RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#2 of 27 OFFLINE   dpippel

dpippel

    HTF Premium Member



  • 3,303 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 24 2000
  • Real Name:Doug

Posted July 10 2012 - 07:05 AM

Disappointing news.


Careful man, there's a beverage here!


#3 of 27 OFFLINE   Richard Gallagher

Richard Gallagher

    Producer



  • 3,128 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 2001
  • Real Name:Rich Gallagher
  • LocationFishkill, NY

Posted July 10 2012 - 08:07 AM

I watched it last night and will try to get a review up this evening.


My overall impression was that it is overly dark, probably the result of the high contrast which RAH refers to.

I have the DVD from THE FILMS OF RITA HAYWORTH box set and will do a comparison before I write the review.


  • Mark Walker likes this
Rich Gallagher

#4 of 27 OFFLINE   Robert Harris

Robert Harris

    Archivist



  • 7,609 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 08 1999
  • Real Name:Robert Harris

Posted July 10 2012 - 09:41 AM

Originally Posted by Richard Gallagher 

I watched it last night and will try to get a review up this evening.


My overall impression was that it is overly dark, probably the result of the high contrast which RAH refers to.

I have the DVD from THE FILMS OF RITA HAYWORTH box set and will do a comparison before I write the review.


You're correct, Richard.  Seems to be a problem with an optically exposed IP from the original negatives, and a huge contrast gain.


I'm told that the original negs are no longer in good condition, and there may be no fine grains.


This may be as good as it gets.


RAH


"All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible. This I did." T.E. Lawrence


#5 of 27 OFFLINE   Escapay

Escapay

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 239 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 04 2008
  • Real Name:Albert Gutierrez
  • LocationSomewhere in Time and Space

Posted July 10 2012 - 09:59 AM

I have the DVD from THE FILMS OF RITA HAYWORTH box set and will do a comparison before I write the review.

Richard, when you compare the DVD & Blu-Ray, can you make an assessment about the "photo shoot" scene (around the 38-minute mark)? It's been my go-to scene for assessing how the colors of Cover Girl look, and I'd like to get a professional opinion. Actually, if RAH has time, I would love his input on that scene as well. I received my "Cover Girl" Blu-Ray on Saturday and was generally satisfied with the film's look overall (then again, I'm watching on a small 52-inch HDTV). I think I'd rank the different Cover Girl DVD/Blu-Ray releases as this: 2010 Blu-Ray > 2003 DVD > 2010 DVD I loved how bright and colorful the 2003 DVD looked, and was shocked at how dark all the colors suddenly became in the 2010 DVD. The Blu-Ray looks like the same restoration as the 2010 DVD, but looked much better to me. This is what I wrote on the Twilight Time Facebook wall, although bear in mind, it was around midnight or so and I had spent an hour just switching three different discs back and forth on my player to watch various scenes: When I initially viewed the 2010 DVD, I thought it was inferior to the 2003 DVD, even though it was touted by Sony as being remastered (as was "Gilda" in the box set). I felt the 2003 DVD looked more colorful and was slightly brighter, even if it was riddled with artifacts and blemishes. The 2010 DVD removed those deficiencies and provided a sharper image, but was darker, duller, and didn't seem very Technicolor-y to me. Whenever I wanted to watch "Cover Girl," I'd just pull out the 2003 DVD as I loved the vivid colors and vibrancy that the picture had. However, when I put in the Blu-Ray, I was completely blown away by the image. It was MUCH better than the 2010 DVD, even though I think both were from the same restoration job. But the Blu-Ray just looked amazing. What I thought were duller colors had a new vibrancy to them, and the detail was amazing. And most importantly, there was grain. The 2010 DVD looked like the grain had been washed away. The Blu-Ray had a healthy layer that made the picture come alive in a way I had never seen before. For example, in the photo shoot scene (around the 38-minute mark), the 2003 DVD looked bright, but slightly faded. However, it seemed like it was the "correct" one to me for a long time. When I watched that same scene on the 2010 DVD, it was duller and the colors didn't really scream out the way the 2003 DVD did. Then I put in the Blu-Ray, and all of a sudden, Rita's hair gets that ginger sheen again, the green background actually looks real, and there's such fine detail in her face, make-up, and that veil, all of which I never noticed before. I felt like I could have reached in and kissed her. It was the same scene as I experienced on the 2003 and 2010 DVDs, but looked so much better than I imagined it ever could. Were my eyes simply seeing what they wanted to see? I like to think maybe I was just too taken by Rita Hayworth to pay much attention to how the actual picture looked. Granted, I'm still satisfied with the Blu-Ray, and will continue to watch it whenever I'm in a Cover Girl mood. But it would be great to read others' thoughts on the transfer.

#6 of 27 OFFLINE   Richard Gallagher

Richard Gallagher

    Producer



  • 3,128 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 2001
  • Real Name:Rich Gallagher
  • LocationFishkill, NY

Posted July 10 2012 - 03:49 PM

Albert,


I only have the 2010 DVD for comparison purposes, and will pop it in to check it out in a few minutes. As it is late on the east coast I won't be getting the review done until tomorrow.


The Blu-ray certainly is not unwatchable, but I expected it to be much brighter. I'll see if I agree with your assessment that it is a significant upgrade over the 2010 DVD.


Rich Gallagher

#7 of 27 OFFLINE   Escapay

Escapay

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 239 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 04 2008
  • Real Name:Albert Gutierrez
  • LocationSomewhere in Time and Space

Posted July 10 2012 - 04:24 PM

Thanks, Richard. :)

#8 of 27 OFFLINE   marcco00

marcco00

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 175 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 14 2010
  • Real Name:marc
  • LocationLos Angeles, California

Posted July 10 2012 - 08:44 PM

after spending many frustrating hours fiddling with my tv's picture settings, i was just able to salvage the dark transfer of 2010's 'cover girl' dvd: brightness and (particularly) contrast at the highest level possible--- sharpness at a low level to erase all that grain..... then, the 2010 dvd looks quite similar to the 2003 dvd (imho). perhaps that will help the blu ray also. ditto with 'tonight and every night' and 'salome' from ' the films of RH ' collection......the vhs releases were much brighter than their 2010 dvd counterparts

#9 of 27 OFFLINE   Bob Cashill

Bob Cashill

    Screenwriter



  • 2,233 posts
  • Join Date: Aug 15 2001

Posted July 11 2012 - 05:13 AM

Blu-ray.com review; not a rave: http://www.blu-ray.c...y/45341/#Review

#10 of 27 OFFLINE   Lidenbrock

Lidenbrock

    Agent



  • 29 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 20 2005
  • Real Name:Albert GC

Posted July 11 2012 - 11:15 AM

After reading Mr. Harris´s words, I´ve checked the screencaps at blu-ray.com, and I can only stare at them in disbelief. Mr. Harris, I respect your opinions very much and my eyes have always agreed with your "A few words about", but do you really think this blu-ray is that terrible? I have no idea what this film is supposed to look like, but I don´t find most of the screencaps less detailed than the ones from Singin´ in the rain.

#11 of 27 OFFLINE   John Hermes

John Hermes

    Supporting Actor



  • 789 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 01 2007
  • Real Name:John Hermes
  • LocationLa Mesa (San Diego) CA

Posted July 11 2012 - 11:26 AM

After reading Mr. Harris´s words, I´ve checked the screencaps at blu-ray.com, and I can only stare at them in disbelief. Mr. Harris, I respect your opinions very much and my eyes have always agreed with your "A few words about", but do you really think this blu-ray is that terrible? I have no idea what this film is supposed to look like, but I don´t find most of the screencaps less detailed than the ones from Singin´ in the rain.

As has been said many times before, don't go by screen caps. RAH has seen both BDs projected onto a large screen. That is the only way to really judge things. Don't go by a screen cap a couple inches wide.

#12 of 27 OFFLINE   moviepas

moviepas

    Second Unit



  • 442 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 13 2011

Posted July 11 2012 - 11:50 AM

I also have the two DVDs and the Laserdisc version. I was happy with the LD and it far exceeded a lot of color transfers I had seen at that time. I have not viewed the 2010 DVD(from a delayed DVD Box set that we finally got) and my shipment of the Blu Ray was only announced in the passed hour or so in my e-mails. I will see when I get it in a week or so.



#13 of 27 OFFLINE   TheVid

TheVid

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 82 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 10 2011

Posted July 12 2012 - 02:40 AM

It's a nice blu-ray, but the contrast boosting was noticeable. I'm not unimpressed, just not excited. Sadly, as usual, the Harris view is right on, and a luscious, Technicolor version of COVER GIRL remains "long ago and far away".

#14 of 27 OFFLINE   Richard Gallagher

Richard Gallagher

    Producer



  • 3,128 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 09 2001
  • Real Name:Rich Gallagher
  • LocationFishkill, NY

Posted July 12 2012 - 03:12 AM

The HTF review is up.


Cover Girl Blu-ray Review


  • Mark Walker likes this
Rich Gallagher

#15 of 27 OFFLINE   Keith Cobby

Keith Cobby

    Supporting Actor



  • 942 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 08 2013
  • Real Name:Keith Cobby
  • LocationKent "The Garden of England", UK

Posted February 24 2013 - 02:32 AM

Cover Girl is one of my favourite films and so this Blu-ray was an essential purchase for me. The picture quality is superior to that of the 2003 DVD but not as bright. Based on other comments it seems that it is not much of a step up from the (restored) 2010 DVD release which I do not have. I have made the same observations about Pal Joey and Bell Book & Candle. I think this will be the problem going forward with Blu-ray releases of classic films. If it is a favourite you will upgrade but if not the DVD may be good enough. The number of comments about a release on HTF may correlate with the number of copies sold. If this is the case Cover Girl Blu-ray may be in stock for some time.

#16 of 27 OFFLINE   Ejanss

Ejanss

    Screenwriter



  • 1,869 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 23 2012

Posted February 24 2013 - 03:00 AM

Gene Kelly's duel with himself is one of the Great Gene Kelly Scenes, but it never gets featured with the usual MGM-retrospective suspects for not being an MGM musical. That, and the title number, which is a retro blast to see what most magazine covers actually looked like in 1944. :)

#17 of 27 OFFLINE   Kyrsten Brad

Kyrsten Brad

    Supporting Actor



  • 545 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 09 2014
  • Real Name:Brad
  • LocationMerritt Island, Florida

Posted April 24 2014 - 07:40 AM

Watched my new TT blu of "Cover Girl" (got it during the sale).   Never seen it before but got it since it had Phil Silvers, Eve Arden and of course Rita Hayworth. 

Impressive (I'm easy to please for blus) but yes, it did seem a little dim.  Not much but barely noticeable.   Still enjoyed the film and will watch it again.



#18 of 27 OFFLINE   John Maher_289910

John Maher_289910

    Second Unit



  • 308 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 07 2013
  • Real Name:John Maher

Posted April 24 2014 - 09:17 AM

Gene Kelly's duel with himself is one of the Great Gene Kelly Scenes, but it never gets featured with the usual MGM-retrospective suspects for not being an MGM musical. That, and the title number, which is a retro blast to see what most magazine covers actually looked like in 1944. :)

The number that has never been featured in any MGM-retrospectives is "He's My Friend" from THE UNSINKABLE MOLLY BROWN, and it IS MGM!  My favorite number from any MGM film.

 

Gene Kelly punched-out Charles Vidor during the filming of COVER GIRL.  Some say he looks disagreeable, throughout this film.  Not being a Kelly fan, per se, it's been too long since I've seen it, so I can't comment on that.  I like Rita, however, but prefer her with Astaire.



#19 of 27 OFFLINE   ThadK

ThadK

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 176 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 25 2003

Posted April 24 2014 - 07:26 PM

I was not terribly impressed with the color on the TT "Cover Girl"... But then, I've seen it in 35mm Tech, so I'm biased. Frankly, by comparison, the TT "Used Cars" knocked my socks off!


"It's the end of the age of innocence starting now."

 


#20 of 27 OFFLINE   ROclockCK

ROclockCK

    Screenwriter



  • 1,178 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 13 2013
  • Real Name:Steve
  • LocationHigh Country, Alberta, Canada

Posted April 24 2014 - 07:42 PM

I thought Cover Girl looked pretty darn good overall...I mean, for a film with a trashed negative. There was nothing upstream for Grover Crisp and his team to go back to...







Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: A Few Words About

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users