Jump to content



Sign up for a free account!

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests to win things like this Logitech Harmony Ultimate Remote and you won't get the popup ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
Blu-ray Reviews

The Invisible Man: The Complete Series Blu-Ray Review

TV Reviews

  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
85 replies to this topic

#41 of 86 FoxyMulder

FoxyMulder

    映画ファン

  • 4,155 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2009
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationScotland

Posted June 20 2012 - 04:20 AM

Originally Posted by Chas in CT 

This is reminding me of a couple of years ago when someone issued a butchered/stretched Fleischer Gulliver's Travels on Blu-ray.  That was a real circus for a while on Amazon.


Gulliver's Travels is arguably the worst Blu ray release ever.

     :Fun Movie Quotes:

"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself"   

"Maybe it's a sheep dog... let's keep going" 

"Please doctor, I've got to ask this. It sounds like, well, just as though you're describing some form of super carrot"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


#42 of 86 Radioman970

Radioman970

    Producer

  • 5,649 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 22 2006
  • Real Name:James Perry
  • LocationCould be anywhere

Posted June 20 2012 - 07:00 AM

That "president" should be made to buy something from a company like, say Mill Creek... keep buying stuff until he gets a bad one. Then go through their customer service. I had a terrific experience through them. They were not only completely apologetic, and not only replaced my defected DVDs but they sent me a freebie besides! It was something I already had, but I gifted it to family.
Silly Party Candidate:  Tarquin Fin- tim- lim- bim- whin- bim- lim- bus- stop- F'tang- F'tang- Olè- Biscuitbarrel

 


#43 of 86 Jack P

Jack P

    Screenwriter

  • 2,939 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 15 2006

Posted June 20 2012 - 07:01 AM

People of all political persuasions would agree that this is one "president" who deserves to be impeached! :)

#44 of 86 MatthewA

MatthewA

    Producer

  • 6,010 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000
  • Real Name:Matthew
  • LocationSalinas, CA

Posted June 20 2012 - 07:02 AM

This disc was already a low, and they just started digging deeper with that response to Simon's letter. I will never buy anything of theirs again if this is the way they treat their customers.


Enough is enough, Disney. We DEMAND the release Song of the South on Blu-ray.

 

My DVD/BD List at DVD Aficionado


#45 of 86 FoxyMulder

FoxyMulder

    映画ファン

  • 4,155 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2009
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationScotland

Posted June 20 2012 - 07:07 AM

Originally Posted by MatthewA 

This disc was already a low, and they just started digging deeper with that response to Simon's letter. I will never buy anything of theirs again if this is the way they treat their customers.


I wonder what they do with 2.35:1 films on Blu ray, do they have the rights to any such films, and if so, do they crop them so that no black bars are visible on 16/9 sets. ?


     :Fun Movie Quotes:

"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself"   

"Maybe it's a sheep dog... let's keep going" 

"Please doctor, I've got to ask this. It sounds like, well, just as though you're describing some form of super carrot"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


#46 of 86 TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul

  • 21,468 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted June 20 2012 - 07:42 AM

I wonder what they do with 2.35:1 films on Blu ray, do they have the rights to any such films, and if so, do they crop them so that no black bars are visible on 16/9 sets. ?

Based on their logic with this release, they'd have to because they would receive more complaints about a rectangle picture in the middle of the TV screen than what they ended up doing.

#47 of 86 FoxyMulder

FoxyMulder

    映画ファン

  • 4,155 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2009
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationScotland

Posted June 20 2012 - 08:01 AM

Originally Posted by TravisR 

Based on their logic with this release, they'd have to because they would receive more complaints about a rectangle picture in the middle of the TV screen than what they ended up doing.


Yet they give the DVD releases the original aspect ratio treatment, i don't get it, they must think Blu ray owners all hate black bars, all very strange and i'd like them to drop by the site and explain themselves. I'm tempted to email them myself just to see what reply i get.


     :Fun Movie Quotes:

"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself"   

"Maybe it's a sheep dog... let's keep going" 

"Please doctor, I've got to ask this. It sounds like, well, just as though you're describing some form of super carrot"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


#48 of 86 HenryDuBrow

HenryDuBrow

    Screenwriter

  • 1,212 posts
  • Join Date: Jan 23 2004

Posted June 20 2012 - 08:09 AM

What a completely poor answer from that Jeff dude, only idiots would bother complaining about a square picture on a product from an era where it was standard norm. Those he's assuming might complain have big TV sets now anyway and as mentioned earlier most new flat screens have a much larger 4:3 picture than old TV sets, so what the hell is the problem. There is no problem, instead VEI gets the problem of dealing with dissatisfied fans of the show and for some reason that's less important than his imagining of ignorant kids hypothetically complaining about an actually huge square picture in the middle of the screen. Utterly laughable.

#49 of 86 FoxyMulder

FoxyMulder

    映画ファン

  • 4,155 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2009
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationScotland

Posted June 20 2012 - 08:23 AM

I sent a polite email using my own web address host ( DarkRealmFox ) and it said blacklisted due to spam bot-net concerns, hmmm never had that happen before now, i suppose there is a first for everything.


Anyways i then sent via my other email address and i have asked about the aspect ratio and the use of only one disc, i hope i get a reply.


     :Fun Movie Quotes:

"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself"   

"Maybe it's a sheep dog... let's keep going" 

"Please doctor, I've got to ask this. It sounds like, well, just as though you're describing some form of super carrot"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


#50 of 86 Jack P

Jack P

    Screenwriter

  • 2,939 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 15 2006

Posted June 20 2012 - 09:24 AM

Take a look at the response I just got! "We have decided to release in its 4:3 ratio on the next run. "We cannot change the bit rate because it would mean a lot more discs. This would increase the price dramatically on the set. The overall image quality will not be reduced significantly. "The conversion on this particular title was scanned from film. Thus making this the best quality available. This is a very expensive process and I believe the costs were enormous. If there any scratches or flaws it came from the film. We did the very best to clean it up especially we were able to see the before and after video." A very quick mea culpa turnaround on the aspect ratio, but not on the bit rate. Now we have to wait for the second printing to see it done right aspect ratio wise.

#51 of 86 Jason_V

Jason_V

    Producer

  • 4,613 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001
  • Real Name:Jason
  • LocationBothell, WA

Posted June 20 2012 - 09:28 AM

That is awesome.  What a quick about face!



#52 of 86 TravisR

TravisR

    Studio Mogul

  • 21,468 posts
  • Join Date: Nov 15 2004
  • LocationThe basement of the FBI building

Posted June 20 2012 - 10:05 AM

I take back my criticism. And a big thumbs up for the quick announcement of a change too.

#53 of 86 Radioman970

Radioman970

    Producer

  • 5,649 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 22 2006
  • Real Name:James Perry
  • LocationCould be anywhere

Posted June 20 2012 - 10:23 AM

Well... that's 1 thing settled.
Silly Party Candidate:  Tarquin Fin- tim- lim- bim- whin- bim- lim- bus- stop- F'tang- F'tang- Olè- Biscuitbarrel

 


#54 of 86 FoxyMulder

FoxyMulder

    映画ファン

  • 4,155 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2009
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationScotland

Posted June 20 2012 - 11:10 AM

Originally Posted by Jack P 

Take a look at the response I just got!
"We have decided to release in its 4:3 ratio on the next run.
"We cannot change the bit rate because it would mean a lot more discs. This would increase the price dramatically on the set. The overall image quality will not be reduced significantly.
"The conversion on this particular title was scanned from film. Thus making this the best quality available. This is a very expensive process and I believe the costs were enormous. If there any scratches or flaws it came from the film. We did the very best to clean it up especially we were able to see the before and after video."
A very quick mea culpa turnaround on the aspect ratio, but not on the bit rate. Now we have to wait for the second printing to see it done right aspect ratio wise.


Not worth buying unless they also put it out on more discs, 3 disc set minimum, too much compression is bad, 3 discs is not a lot more and the price should not be dramatically increased by adding 2 extra discs.


     :Fun Movie Quotes:

"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself"   

"Maybe it's a sheep dog... let's keep going" 

"Please doctor, I've got to ask this. It sounds like, well, just as though you're describing some form of super carrot"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


#55 of 86 MatthewA

MatthewA

    Producer

  • 6,010 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000
  • Real Name:Matthew
  • LocationSalinas, CA

Posted June 20 2012 - 11:20 AM

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out.


Enough is enough, Disney. We DEMAND the release Song of the South on Blu-ray.

 

My DVD/BD List at DVD Aficionado


#56 of 86 FoxyMulder

FoxyMulder

    映画ファン

  • 4,155 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2009
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationScotland

Posted June 20 2012 - 11:54 AM

I just received a reply from Jeff.


Seems to be the stock reply given to Jack several post's above.  Not that happy, 13 episodes on one disc, heavy compression = poor quality as heavy compression does lower overall image quality as in filtering the best detail away - maybe better just buying the DVD as it probably is better optimized with more discs for it's format and could look nicer upscaled, waste of time buying the Blu even if it's the right aspect ratio unless they put this on 2 or 3 discs. preferably 3.


     :Fun Movie Quotes:

"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself"   

"Maybe it's a sheep dog... let's keep going" 

"Please doctor, I've got to ask this. It sounds like, well, just as though you're describing some form of super carrot"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


#57 of 86 Chuck B

Chuck B

    Auditioning

  • 12 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 16 2011

Posted June 20 2012 - 04:54 PM

Actually looking at my copy, I think the compression is the best thing about the entire disc. There's no macroblocking, no digital artifacts around areas of high contrast and no image break up on complex images. In fact, it passes the true encoding test and that's fades to and from black. Not many people know this, but that's one of the hardest things an encoder has to deal with (especially with low bit rates). If they're releasing it in 4:3 without DNR, I'm totally going to trade mine in. There's no way an upconverted DVD will look better then scanned film encoded in HD. The encoder used to do the compression has a far, far greater effect on image quality then the bit rate. Also, just do the math. 4 DVD 9s (34.8GB) of information vs. 1 BD50 (50GB) of information. For a distributor to go this far I think is a pretty big deal. Good on them. Cheers

#58 of 86 FoxyMulder

FoxyMulder

    映画ファン

  • 4,155 posts
  • Join Date: Sep 14 2009
  • Real Name:Malcolm
  • LocationScotland

Posted June 20 2012 - 10:25 PM

Originally Posted by Chuck B 

Actually looking at my copy, I think the compression is the best thing about the entire disc. There's no macroblocking, no digital artifacts around areas of high contrast and no image break up on complex images. In fact, it passes the true encoding test and that's fades to and from black. Not many people know this, but that's one of the hardest things an encoder has to deal with (especially with low bit rates).
If they're releasing it in 4:3 without DNR, I'm totally going to trade mine in. There's no way an upconverted DVD will look better then scanned film encoded in HD. The encoder used to do the compression has a far, far greater effect on image quality then the bit rate. Also, just do the math. 4 DVD 9s (34.8GB) of information vs. 1 BD50 (50GB) of information.
For a distributor to go this far I think is a pretty big deal. Good on them.
Cheers


I doubt on a projection system it will look good, no way can you fit 650 minutes onto one disc without filtering away high frequency information, just because it looks HD doesn't mean it fulfills the formats potential, you get "smooth"  filtered HD and you get film like HD, this was shot 35mm film, can you really say it looks like it should look like.


 It's a big deal indeed a huge deal for me that they chose one disc only, i have seen the results of over compression on films, such as Seraphim Falls, UK edition, ( just one example ) it turns everything smooth and the best detail is obliterated, it's DNR HD, its also obvious on a larger screen, maybe you like that, i don't, there is also the "blur effect" with DNR, sorry but can you really tell me this disc with 650 minutes on it looks good, i just doubt it.


     :Fun Movie Quotes:

"A good body with a dull brain is as cheap as life itself"   

"Maybe it's a sheep dog... let's keep going" 

"Please doctor, I've got to ask this. It sounds like, well, just as though you're describing some form of super carrot"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 


#59 of 86 Chuck B

Chuck B

    Auditioning

  • 12 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 16 2011

Posted June 21 2012 - 02:14 AM

One disc obviously won't look as good as 3, that's a no brainer. But all this talk about smoothing or "DNR HD" (which doesn't even exist) makes no sense. The discs don't look great, but that's the noise reduction's fault much more so then the low bitrate. And that's a separate step, before the video is even compressed. The compression itself is surprising considering the amount of video they fit on a disc. As I mentioned in my last post, the types of noise you get from low bitrates aren't there. Also, from the sound of your posts, you never even saw the the discs. You can't just recycle terms you read from previous posts and make assumptions. Why because you rented other movies you didn't like and played them on a giant dull projector? Come on. I watched 6 episodes so far on a 58" plasma TV and they look a bit smooth. The picture looks much better then upconverted DVDs. The real problem was the decision to crop the video. Hopefully, they'll skip the noise reduction on the 4:3 version and they'll look even better.

#60 of 86 SimonTemplar

SimonTemplar

    Stunt Coordinator

  • 73 posts
  • Join Date: Mar 31 2004

Posted June 21 2012 - 04:56 AM

If they follow it up with a blu ray of The Gemini Man in 4:3 then we 70s invisibility fans may be very happy.





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Blu-ray Reviews, TV Reviews

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users