Jump to content



Sign up for a free account to remove the pop-up ads

Signing up for an account is fast and free. As a member you can join in the conversation, enter contests and remove the pop-up ads that guests get. Click here to create your free account.

Photo
- - - - -

The Rescuers 35th Anniversary Edition and The Rescuers Down Under Blu-ray available for preorder on Amazon


  • You cannot start a new topic
  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 of 24 OFFLINE   Ronald Epstein

Ronald Epstein

    Studio Mogul



  • 40,626 posts
  • Join Date: Jul 03 1997

Posted June 01 2012 - 09:37 AM

http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/

http://static.hometh...um.com/imgrepo/


 

Ronald J Epstein
Home Theater Forum co-owner

 

 Click Here for the latest/hottest Blu-ray Preorders  Click Here for our complete Blu-ray review archive

 Click Here for our complete 3D Blu-ray review archive Click Here for our complete DVD review archive

 Click Here for Blu-Ray Preorder Release Schedule  Click Here for forum posting rules and regulations


#2 of 24 OFFLINE   Dick

Dick

    Producer



  • 4,262 posts
  • Join Date: May 22 1999
  • Real Name:Rick

Posted June 03 2012 - 08:28 AM

Note that these were both theatrical releases, and well up to the Disney animation quality we love. The sequel is about as good as the original. A blind buy, unlike films such as POCAHONTAS and FOX AND HOUND which are paired with very inferior sequels.

#3 of 24 OFFLINE   MattAlbie60

MattAlbie60

    I Work for Mr. E. H. Harriman of the Union Pacific Railroad.



  • 561 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 21 2010
  • Real Name:Stephen Lilley
  • LocationBaltimore, Maryland

Posted June 04 2012 - 12:18 AM

I *loved* THE RESCUERS DOWN UNDER when I was a kid. Loved it. Adored it. But I watched it maybe five or so years ago, and in my opinion it doesn't hold up at all. However, I suspect it will look amazing on Blu-ray, as if it had one thing going for it, it was its animation. THE RESCUERS is still pretty incredible, though. I started revisiting movies I loved as a child in college (THE RESCUERS DOWN UNDER, JAWS 3, SUPERMAN IV, ALIEN 3, etc...) and determined the following: 1. As a child, I was an idiot, and 2. I was consistently very, very close to liking something awesome, but for some bizarre reason I always gravitated towards the entries in a particular franchise that were bad. I'd like to think that in recent years I have corrected both of those two things, but I suppose the verdict is still out :)

#4 of 24 OFFLINE   Lord Dalek

Lord Dalek

    Screenwriter



  • 2,173 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 04 2005

Posted June 04 2012 - 02:09 AM

Hope Rescuers Down Under is DDD sourced this time.



#5 of 24 OFFLINE   SilverWook

SilverWook

    Screenwriter



  • 1,618 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2006

Posted June 04 2012 - 07:53 AM

I presume those infamous frames in The Rescuers that triggered a recall of the VHS will not be restored? :D Anyone else remember a contest from when the first film came out where one of the prizes was a replica of The Devil's Eye? I always wondered if it looked like the gem in the movie.

#6 of 24 OFFLINE   darkrock17

darkrock17

    Supporting Actor



  • 824 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 13 2007
  • Real Name:Andrew McClure
  • LocationAlexandria, VA

Posted June 04 2012 - 08:41 AM

I presume those infamous frames in The Rescuers that triggered a recall of the VHS will not be restored? :D Anyone else remember a contest from when the first film came out where one of the prizes was a replica of The Devil's Eye? I always wondered if it looked like the gem in the movie.

A replica of The Devil's Eye? never heard of that, was it a real diamond?

#7 of 24 OFFLINE   Johnny Angell

Johnny Angell

    Played With Dinosaurs Member



  • 5,415 posts
  • Join Date: Dec 13 1998
  • Real Name:Johnny Angell
  • LocationCentral Arkansas

Posted June 04 2012 - 03:18 PM

A replica of The Devil's Eye? never heard of that, was it a real diamond?

I don't remember that. Please enlighten me, you've got me curious.
Johnny
www.teamfurr.org
But a family cat is not replaceable like a wornout coat or a set of tires. Each new kitten becomes its own cat, and none is repeated. I am four cats old, measuring out my life in friends that have succeeded but not replaced one another.--Irving Townsend


#8 of 24 OFFLINE   SilverWook

SilverWook

    Screenwriter



  • 1,618 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2006

Posted June 04 2012 - 05:34 PM

A replica of The Devil's Eye? never heard of that, was it a real diamond?

That's what I've wondered all these years. A real gem that big would have been more costly than an all expenses paid trip to Disneyworld.(Which I think was one of the other prizes.) Some obsessive Disneyana collector must know...

#9 of 24 OFFLINE   Sam Favate

Sam Favate

    Producer



  • 4,949 posts
  • Join Date: Feb 03 2004
  • Real Name:Sam Favate

Posted June 04 2012 - 11:11 PM

Both are good films (not great). Down Under has some really nice animation, and someone correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it one of the first times computers were used in the animation process? Those sweeping views of the scenery?


#10 of 24 OFFLINE   dana martin

dana martin

    Screenwriter



  • 1,962 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 28 2003
  • Real Name:Dana Martin
  • LocationNorfolk, VA

Posted June 05 2012 - 12:57 AM

Originally Posted by Sam Favate 

Both are good films (not great). Down Under has some really nice animation, and someone correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it one of the first times computers were used in the animation process? Those sweeping views of the scenery?

so well done,ut itink Disney's better limited use was the clock towerin The Great Mouse Dective, that whole sequence is just outstanding


Playing at the Drive In

Quote:Welles, Kubrick, Hitchcock, Spielberg, Jackson, Wood ?? a true Auteur should be one who follows his artistic vision

#11 of 24 OFFLINE   cafink

cafink

    Producer



  • 3,043 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999

Posted June 05 2012 - 01:19 AM

The Rescuers Down Under was indeed one of the earlier animated films to use CGI. I was just looking at some clips on Youtube and am impressed at how well they hold up over 20 years later! I've been on an '80s/'90s animation kick lately and can't wait to watch this on Blu-ray.
 

 


#12 of 24 OFFLINE   Jason_V

Jason_V

    Producer



  • 4,843 posts
  • Join Date: May 07 2001
  • Real Name:Jason
  • LocationBothell, WA

Posted June 06 2012 - 02:17 PM

The Disney Movie Rewards Facebook page is reporting an August 21 release date.



#13 of 24 OFFLINE   SilverWook

SilverWook

    Screenwriter



  • 1,618 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2006

Posted June 07 2012 - 05:17 PM

Both are good films (not great). Down Under has some really nice animation, and someone correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it one of the first times computers were used in the animation process? Those sweeping views of the scenery? 

I'm pretty sure The Black Cauldron used CGI for the one shot of all the "fake" cauldrons flying around and taking off into the distance.

#14 of 24 OFFLINE   Chuck Pennington

Chuck Pennington

    Supporting Actor



  • 861 posts
  • Join Date: May 11 2001

Posted June 08 2012 - 12:49 AM

A replica of The Devil's Eye? never heard of that, was it a real diamond?

The frames of which you speak were not on the initial 1992 Laserdisc or VHS releases, but they were on the January 1999 VHS and Laserdisc. The Laserdisc street date was a week or two after the VHS, and it was about a week or so after the VHS was released that the recall happened. The Laserdisc never even hit store shelves, although distributors had received stock. I had mine preordered so they sent it to me. :-) I wonder how many collectors got their hands on one. Not many people seem to know about the recall or naughty frames, and even fewer seem to know why they are there on the 1999 release but are not on the 1992 edition.

#15 of 24 OFFLINE   cafink

cafink

    Producer



  • 3,043 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 1999

Posted June 08 2012 - 03:09 AM

I've long been curious about how those frames got there. Snopes says: "The two 'topless woman' frames had reputedly been present in the film ever since its original 1977 theatrical release (a fact apparently confirmed by Disney, whose spokesperson said that the tampering 'was done more than 20 years ago'), although Disney claims that they were not included in the 1992 home video version because 'it was made from a different print.' Disney also claimed that the images were not placed in the film by any of their animators, but were inserted during the post-production process." I don't know quite enough about how movies are made to make sense of this. It sounds like, after the film was complete, there were multiple copies. Why? For what purpose? I mean, it doesn't sound like this was an actual release print, because they wouldn't have used that for the video, right?
 

 


#16 of 24 OFFLINE   SilverWook

SilverWook

    Screenwriter



  • 1,618 posts
  • Join Date: Oct 11 2006

Posted June 08 2012 - 10:56 AM

The frames of which you speak were not on the initial 1992 Laserdisc or VHS releases, but they were on the January 1999 VHS and Laserdisc. The Laserdisc street date was a week or two after the VHS, and it was about a week or so after the VHS was released that the recall happened. The Laserdisc never even hit store shelves, although distributors had received stock. I had mine preordered so they sent it to me. :-) I wonder how many collectors got their hands on one. Not many people seem to know about the recall or naughty frames, and even fewer seem to know why they are there on the 1999 release but are not on the 1992 edition.

I lucked out in getting a sealed copy on Ebay at the time. Just like that recalled Best of Roger Rabbit disc, Disney just wasn't fast enough. ;) It's curious this never seemed to get as much notice as all the things people only imagine they see or hear in other Disney films.

#17 of 24 OFFLINE   John Weller

John Weller

    Stunt Coordinator



  • 175 posts
  • Join Date: May 27 2012

Posted July 16 2012 - 06:02 AM

Was The Rescuers Dolby on its original release?

#18 of 24 Guest__*

Guest__*
  • Join Date: --

Posted July 16 2012 - 08:12 AM

The funny this is, I think the naughty frames were on the Wonderful World of Disney opening and can be seen on various Disney movies released under that Wonderful World label on dvd (ex. The Sword and the Rose.)



#19 of 24 OFFLINE   MatthewA

MatthewA

    Producer



  • 6,320 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 19 2000
  • Real Name:Matthew
  • LocationSalinas, CA

Posted July 16 2012 - 09:44 AM

Originally Posted by John Weller 

Was The Rescuers Dolby on its original release?


No. I don't think any of the animated films got Dolby soundtracks until The Black Cauldron, although I have heard conflicting reports on whether The Fox and the Hound was.


Enough is enough, Disney. No more evasions or excuses. We DEMAND the release Song of the South on Blu-ray along with the uncut version of Bedknobs and Broomsticks on Blu-ray. I am going to boycott The Walt Disney Company until then.


#20 of 24 OFFLINE   Lord Dalek

Lord Dalek

    Screenwriter



  • 2,173 posts
  • Join Date: Apr 04 2005

Posted July 17 2012 - 02:40 AM

Originally Posted by MatthewA 


No. I don't think any of the animated films got Dolby soundtracks until The Black Cauldron, although I have heard conflicting reports on whether The Fox and the Hound was.


Yeah Fox and the Hound was probably mono originally. It has a RCA Photophone credit (the last film I think to have such a thing) instead of a Dolby credit.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users